Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the importance of magic in the play a midsummer night's dream
Critics of a midsummer night's dream
Midsummer night dream compare and contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Lenny Cohen Early Shakespeare Dr. Zysk 2-18-14 Shakespeare’s Dream Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream offers itself as a metaphor which both reflects and critiques the theatre. The word “dream” is used as a catalyst for action and a tool to pose questions about the nature of reality versus the stage. Shakespeare achieves this metaphorical critique in part through the deviance of Oberon and Puck, who become the plays second “sub- playwrights” by using potion and the power of dreams to create an additional narrative within the play. The play rely’s heavily on contrast to enforce this metaphorical comparison. Helena is tall while Hermia is short, the fairies are graceful and magical while the mechanicals are clumsy and bumbling. The play is constantly juxtaposing two or more plots, comparing elements that are both mystical and ordinary, often times not making much sense on the surface and requiring further interpretation. This style is deliberate, a technique Shakespeare uses wherein he writes his play in the vein of a dream, only adding to the fantastical nature of its reading and performance. The word “dream” evolves throughout the play and the narrative is careful to evolve alongside it, always with the intent to critique the stage and the reality (or lack of reality) in which the audience inhabits. Beginning with Puck’s final epilogue to the audience “If we shadows have offended/ Think but this/ and all is mended/ That you have but slumbered here/ While these visions did appear.” (Epilogue) Shakespeare has set forth a disclaimer asking the audience to take no offense on his musings of dreams and reality. Shakespeare alludes to the actors on the stage as “shadows” which portray a vers... ... middle of paper ... ...like Bottom can see the limitless potential of both mediums. To speak as Shakespeare speaks regarding A Midsummer Night’s Dream as dream and Oberon as the manipulator or conspirator of dreams within the play should not deminish the plays significance as a work of literary drama. Instead, I put forward that Shakespeare intends for the play to be viewed not as a separate and distinct entity from the natural world but simply as a component of it. This is to say that while a play is comprised of a beginning, middle and end, it transcends time and space in the same sense as a dream or a memory. This idea relates to the Renaissance theory of the open system where a flow occurs both in and out. A Midsummer Night’s Dream dares to live outside the confines of its pages just as dreams live outside the confines of our minds.
I am going to start my essay by looking at the way in which plays were
The main theme of the play is trying to put across a strong view to
... reality of their state of affairs and characters. The play is swathed in deceit on diploid levels, both the plot and the underlying personalities and motivations bear disparities between appearance and reality.
One of the themes of Hansberry’s play is the value and purpose of dreams. The
meanings along with what is going on in the plot of the play, it is
iv. i. 29-54. Oberon’s greed for the child and power caused problems for many. As one can see, Oberon is the origin of all of the complications in the play. He failed to realize that his careless and greedy actions devastated an abounding number of people.
In A Midsummer Night's Dream, playwright William Shakespeare creates in Bottom, Oberon, and Puck unique characters that represent different aspects of him. Like Bottom, Shakespeare aspires to rise socially; Bottom has high aims and, however slightly, interacts with a queen. Through Bottom, Shakespeare mocks these pretensions within himself. Shakespeare also resembles King Oberon, controlling the magic we see on the stage. Unseen, he and Oberon pull the strings that control what the characters act and say. Finally, Shakespeare is like Puck, standing back from the other characters, acutely aware of their weaknesses and mocks them, relishing in mischief at their expense. With these three characters and some play-within-a-play enchantment, Shakespeare mocks himself and his plays as much as he does the young lovers and the mechanicals onstage. This genius playwright who is capable of writing serious dramas such as Hamlet and Julius Caesar is still able to laugh at himself just as he does at his characters. With the help of Bottom, Oberon, and Puck, Shakespeare shows us that theatre, and even life itself, are illusions that one should remember to laugh at.
The criticism relies on two assumptions. One, that rhetoric creates reality, and two, that convergence occurs. With regards to rhetoric creating reality we are to assume that the symbolic forms that are created from the rhetoric are not imitations but organs of reality. This is because it is through their agency that anything becomes real. We assume to that convergence occurs because symbols not only create reality for individuals but that individual’s meanings can combine to create a shared reality for participants. The shared reality then provides a basis for the community of participants to discuss their common experiences and to achieve a mutual understanding. The consequence of this is that the individuals develop the same attitudes and emotions to the personae of the drama. Within this criticism the audience is seen as the most critical part because the sharing of the message is seen as being so significant.
...ne else in the play the power of language to alter reality, and the issues of conscious or unconscious deceit.
Furthermore, Shakespeare introduces the Players to add an extra dimension to his ideas on the effects of disassembly. The juxtaposition of the `play within a play' acts as a subtle literary device that suggests that, as Hamlet's play occurs in the middle of the play, the play itself revolves around the pretence undertaken by the majority of Shakespeare's characters.
The reader’s first impression that this play revolves around a recurring theme of dreams is from the title. As the title suggests, dreams are going to and do, essentially play a very important role in this production because major events that occur within the play are all centered on and around the characters’ dreams. A second clue regarding the role of dreams is found in ...
This is how Shakespeare’s plays are a product of the Elizabethan theatrical context in which they were first performed.
In William Shakespeare’s book, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, magic is a powerful and useful tool for the characters that have the capability to use it. Some of the characters abuse the power of magic, while others are more responsible in how they use it. Oberon is one the characters that abuses the power of magic. Oberon’s magic has an immense impact on the plot of A Midsummer Night’s Dream. More specifically, Oberon’s magic affects his own life, the lives of other characters, and all the characters in the story experience his magic differently. We will see that even the person who has power to use the magic can become surprised by it. Magic, the ultimate supernatural power, is often unpredictable and inexplicable.
I chose this book to explore whether our dreams do mean anything, and whether it does symbolise and influence our past and future. The points that I will be talking about The Interpretation of Dreams in my review is the theories of manifest and latent dream content, dreams as wish fulfilments, and the significance of childhood experiences.
It makes sense to me to see in this Shakespeare's sense of his own art--both what it can achieve and what it cannot. The theatre--that magical world of poetry, song, illusion, pleasing and threatening apparitions--can, like Prospero's magic, educate us into a better sense of ourselves, into a final acceptance of the world, a state in which we forgive and forget in the interests of the greater human community. The theatre, that is, can reconcile us to the joys of the human community so that we do not destroy our families in a search for righting past evils in a spirit of personal revenge or as crude assertions of our own egos. It can, in a very real sense, help us fully to understand the central Christian commitment to charity, to loving our neighbour as ourselves. The magic here brings about a total reconciliation of all levels of society from sophisticated rulers to semi-human brutes, momentarily holding off Machiavellian deceit, drunken foolishness, and animalistic rebellion--each person, no matter how he has lived, has a place in the magic circle at the end. And no one is asking any awkward questions.