A Jury Of Her Peers Compare And Contrast

452 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Glaspells trifles and a jury of her peers

The film A Jury of her Peers, is similar to the play, Trifles because it highlights similar points that are referenced in the text and is clear it was used as a basis for the foundation of the film. The names of Mr. and Mrs. Wright are changed to Mr. and Mrs. Burke. The use of facts to outline the climax, are the same as used in the play. Such as the building of suspense of the discovering of the bird and its strangulation and whether Mrs. Burke or Mr. Burke is to place blame. However, as an adaptation, opinions are added into the original framework of the play to add a touch of personalization. The film interprets the drama as a murder mystery, as the attorney and the sheriff search the household to find evidence to place blame on Mrs. Burke. A jury of her Peers, works to portray the emotions of Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, as they discover items that would, (if found by the men) possibly prove her guilty (Bourne, 2013). …show more content…

While, there is a larger problem at hand, with the death of Mr. Wright, which may have been the result of Mrs. Wright’s actions. The play and the film are similar in the fact that they both present women as un-clear minded and concerned with their trifles (Bourne, 2013). The major elements in the film in the play show the bird cage which presents her imprisonment, the jar of cherries breaking from coldness shows her breaking free from the chains of her imprisonment. Towards the end of both the play and the film, the use of “knot” re-emphasizes the rope and strangulation and its presence in the story

Show More
Related

  • Silent Justice in a Different Key: Suzy Clarkson Holstein´s Trifles

    615 Words  | 2 Pages

    I. Article Summary: Suzy Clarkson Holstein's article, “Silent Justice in a Different Key: Glaspell's 'Trifles'” evaluates the play Trifles and how the difference between the men in the play mirror how a woman's perspective is very different from a man's. Trifles is about two women, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, who show up at a house with their husbands and the county attorney to investigate a murder. The entire time the men are looking for evidence to implicate the accused wife, Minnie Wright, of killing her husband. Meanwhile, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale are there to gather up some items to bring Minnie Wright in jail. While doing so, the women uncover evidence that would prove the wife is culpable but decide to hide it from the men in the last moments of the play. Trifles is evaluated on how the women are able to come up with the evidence unlike the men because they didn't approach it like a crime scene but rather a home, “By contrast, the women arrive at a home. Although neither they or the men realize it, they too are conducting an investigation” (Holstein 283). Holstein also notes they are able to find evidence because they use their own life experiences to relate to the accused murderer, Minnie Wright as shown here; “But the women do not simply remember and sympathize with Minnie. They identify with her, quite literally” (285). Holstein finishes the article by noting the women decide to hide the evidence because of the solidarity they feel towards Minnie Wright; “From Mrs. Hale's perspective, people are linked together through fragile, sometimes imperceptible strands. The tiny trifles of life –a neighbor's visit, a bird's song, the sewing of a quilt –have profound reverberations” (287).

    Read More

  • A Jury Of Her Peers And Trifles Comparison

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    Susan Glaspell was an American playwright, novelist, journalist, and actress. She married in 1903 to a novelist, poet, and playwright George Cram Cook. In 1915 with other actors, writers, and artists they founded Provincetown Players a group that had six seasons in New York City between 1916-1923. She is known to have composed nine novels, fifteen plays, over fifty short stories, and one biography. She was a pioneering feminist writer and America’s first import and modern female playwright. She wrote the one act play “Trifles” for the Provincetown Players was later adapted into the short shorty “A Jury of Her Peers” in 1917. A comparison in Susan Glaspell’s “Trifles” and “A Jury of Her Peers” changes the titles, unfinished worked, and

    Read More

  • A Jury Of Her Peers Rhetorical Analysis

    1411 Words  | 3 Pages

    A story of murder, fear, and the temptation of betrayal is one that easily snatches up the attention of audiences. In “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell, the author uses her southern female characters to emphasize the direct relationship between friendship and connection. Her plot circles around the disastrous discovery of their fellow housewife’s marital murder, and the events that unfolded causing their ultimate decision in prosecuting or shielding her from the men in the story. The author implements revealing dialogue with subtle detailing and glaring symbolism to display the coveted friendships among women above other relationships and that the paths they take to secure them stem from inveterate personal connections.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Trifles And A Jury Of Her Peers

    763 Words  | 2 Pages

    The stories Trifles and “A Jury of Her Peers” are both written by Susan Glaspell. The main event in both Trifles and “A Jury of Her Peers” is a murder in the kitchen. Both stories cover the murder of Mrs.Wright’s husband. But, while both Trifles and “A Jury of Her Peers” are about the same story, and the characters are the same, the points of view differ in the two texts.

    Read More

  • A Jury Of Her Peers Symbolism Essay

    527 Words  | 2 Pages

    Symbolism is a literary device in which words, phrases or actions allude to something more than their literal meanings. In the short story “A Jury of Her Peers”, a major example of symbolism is the quilt. The quilt is perhaps the biggest example because it can be tied to many other examples of symbolism within the story, and can also be interpreted in different ways.

    Read More

  • Susan Glaspell's Trifles

    1167 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ngly asks the women once again whether Mrs. Wright was going to ?quilt it or knot it.? Mrs. Hale replies that she was going to "knot it," which can symbolically represent how Mrs. Wright knotted the rope around her husband?s neck and murdered him.

    Read More

  • To Kill a Canay: A Contrast and Comparison of Trifles to a Jury of Her Peers

    897 Words  | 2 Pages

    Glaspell, A Jury of Her Peers.... ... middle of paper ... ... The women want to bring the remaining jar to Mrs. Wright, in prison, to present her with a symbolic gesture of their support. Cherries are very sweet and used mainly as a garnish, a topping, something one doesn’t need but enjoys.

    Read More

  • The Relevance Today of A Jury of Her Peers

    960 Words  | 2 Pages

    In "A Jury of Her Peers," Susan Glaspell illustrates many social standards women experienced at the turn of the century. She allows the reader to see how a woman's life was completely ruled by social laws, and thus by her husband. Glaspell also reveals the ignorance of the men in the story, in particular the sheriff and the county attorney. I think some examples are rather extreme, but in Glaspell's day, they would have probably been common.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Feminism in Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers

    1103 Words  | 3 Pages

    Feminism in Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers As a strong feminist, Susan Glaspell wrote “Trifles” and then translated it into a story called “A Jury of Her Peers.” These works express Glaspell’s view of the way women were treated at the turn of the century. Even though Glaspell is an acclaimed feminist, her story does not contain the traditional feminist views of equal rights for both sexes. The short story and the play written by Susan Glaspell are very much alike. The story takes place in an old country town in the early 1900’s.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Mrs. Hale and Mr. Wright in Trifles, by Susan Glaspell

    1069 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the play Trifles, written by Susan Glaspell, a small number of people are at the Wright house trying to figure out why and how Mr. Wright was murdered. Mrs. Wright is already the suspect, and all that is needed for the case is evidence for a motive. The jury needs something to show anger or sudden feeling so that they can convict her for murder. The men, Mr. Henderson, Mr. Peters, and Mr. Hale are there to find the evidence. The women, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, are there to pick up a select few items for Mrs. Wright. While the men are going about business and looking for evidence to build a case against Mrs. Wright, the women are looking over what Mrs. Wright left behind and intuitively trying to understand what happened. They are also trying to fathom why Mrs. Wright would be compelled to perform such an act of violence. As the story goes on, it constructs each of the characters in slightly different means. Susan Glaspell presents Mr. Wright and Mrs. Hale as having contrasting and comparable characteristics. While Mrs. Hale and Mr. Wright differ in terms of emotions, they are similar in their cleanliness and are well respected by others.

    Read More

  • Gender Roles in Susan Glaspell's A Jury Of Her Peers and Trifles

    1190 Words  | 3 Pages

    Twentieth century society places few stereotypical roles on men and women.  The men are not the sole breadwinners, as they once were, and the women are no longer the sole homemakers.  The roles are often reversed, or, in the case of both parents working, the old roles are totally inconsequential.  Many works of literature deal with gendered roles and their effect on society as a whole or on an individual as a person.  "A Jury Of Her Peers" and Trifles, both written by Susan Glaspell, are works of literature that deal with socially gendered roles during the early nineteenth century.  The two works are almost exactly alike in that the dialogue from "A Jury Of Her Peers" becomes the actor's lines in Trifles.  The gendered roles in the early 1900s place the woman in the kitchen, serving meals, baking bread, and canning fruits and jellies.  She was also expected to be a mother to her children and a caretaker to her husband.  The man, on the other hand, was expected to take care of his family, providing the home and the food that the wife would prepare.  Often when gender plays too much a part in a household, communication is lost.  The husband can not see a person when he looks at his wife.  This was the case in "A Jury Of Her Peers" and Trifles.  The men totally ignored their wives'  thoughts and roles, and, therefore, they missed the entire point of the real motive behind Mr. Wright's murder.  The social gap between men and women in the early 1800s provided the basis for Glaspell's story, "A Jury Of her Peers" and her play, Trifles.

    Read More

  • "a jury of her peers" research paper

    785 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout history, a plethora of different classes of people, cultures, and races have undergone some form of prejudice. Partiality against women has occurred, and continues to occur, in America. Susan Glaspell, author of "A Jury of her Peers," depicts a story of a close-knit community in the process of solving the mystery of a man's death, thought to be caused by his wife. In the investigation of Mr. Wright’s death, the women helping to search through the Wright farm for clues pointing to evidence of Minnie Wright’s murder of her husband were thought of as useless, when in reality, the women were solely responsible for finding and understanding Mrs. Wright's motives for murdering her husband. Glaspell uses imagery and a woman's point of view to depict how a woman may feel bound by limits set by society--- a feeling most easily understood by women who share the same perception of life.

    Read More

  • Analysis of the Play Trifles

    1307 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...g to conceive to her audience by proving all opinions matter no matter whose it is. By looking in the past the audience can see that the story shows some significant similarities to the time it was written in. Glaspell shows women how a united cause can show the world that women should have just as much rights as men do. The theme of the story is expressly told through how and why Mr. Wright is murdered and Mrs. Peters transformation at the end of the story. Film adaptations that changed the title of Trifles to A Jury of Her Peers probably did it to appeal to the male audience and include a double meaning of how a jury can hold bias even with evidence directly given to them.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast A Jury Of Her Peers And Sheep To The Slaughter

    1323 Words  | 3 Pages

    Housewives are known to be married ladies who tend to their family unit and their spouses needs as their standard occupation. Unfortunately, not all ladies are cheerful housewives and this could prompt a few genuine and miserable circumstances. Particularly if something somehow managed to turn out badly, for example, a pet being killed or their spouse abandoning them for another. This is the subject in the works of "A Jury of Her Peers" by Susan Glaspell and "Sheep to the Slaughter" by Roald Dahl. Here we have two housewives being blamed for killing their spouse in light of such circumstances. Both lady endeavor to appear as blameless as could be expected under the circumstances by putting on the "terrified and helpless wife" act before police.

    Read More

  • Jury Of Peers

    144 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the book "live from death row" by Mumia Abu Jamal in the section "jury of peers?" (98-99) The quote stated by Justice Blackmun "there is reason to believe that his trial and sentencing proceedings were infected with racial prejudice" meaning the Dissenting Justice Blackmun voted not to execute William Henry Hance due to a statement on what a juror had said on hearing racial slurs. This case was basically infected from the start on the evidence of the case. The purpose of this section of reading was to analysis the meaning of what "Jury of peers" is, where in a case jury of ones peers(equal) include a wide of different race, gender, etc. and to ensure that the jury had no previous knowledge relevance to the case. In William Henry case the

    Read More

More about A Jury Of Her Peers Compare And Contrast

Open Document