Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Doctrine of judicial precedent
Note on judicial precedent
Note on judicial precedent
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Doctrine of judicial precedent
A Judicial Precedent
The doctrine of binding precedent or stare decisis, refers to the fact
that, the decision of a higher court will be binding on a court lower
than its hierachy. Judicial precedent can be applied on cases and to
be treated similiarly when the material facts of the cases are
identical.
There are two main principles that are involved in judicial precedent,
there are ratio decidendi and the obiter dictum. Ratio decidendi is a
principle of law on which the court reaches its decision. The ratio
decidendi of a case may be understood as the statement of the law
applied in deciding the legal problem raised by the concrete facts of
the case. The ratio of a case is binding on lower courts but may not
be cited as persuasive authority in later cases.
The second principle is the obiter dictum. It is a statement made by
the judge that is not an essential part of the ratio decidendi. It is
most referred that something said by the way. Obiter dicta a
statements do not form part of the binding precedent, but...
III. Issue. The issue is whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the employer appellee on the employee appellant’s sexual harassment claim, and whether the court was right in excluding evidence regarding the sexual
...rts. The Supreme court often get requests to revisit the case, however the supreme regularly declines the offer.
In the case of Affleck and Damon v. Booth the primary nature of the case was in regards to their fourth amendment rights being broken; no probable cause for Booth and others to search and maintain their assets in the state of Georgia. In the District court, the ruling past onto both parties was that the case was dismissed due to Booth having no personal jurisdiction in the state of Nevada. This therefore was passed up to the Circuit court of Appeals whom overturned the lower courts decision based on the factors of the case encompassed more than the initial seizure. As both parties are not in agreement with where the trial shall be held the Supreme Court now will make a final decision based on issues to be ruled upon, material facts, and legal principles in practice.
Today, China is ranked as the nation with the largest population in the world. It is also a fact that China is amongst one of the countries whose economy is growing at a very rapid rate. It is quite imperative to note that capitalism has been the dominant in this nation, which enables it to not only strengthen, but also capture great regional as well as global influence. Even though China has been rediscovering its ancient tradition elements whilst repackaging them to be in line with modernity, it is evident that the visions embraced are very different from the ones in the West. The Celebrated Cases of Judge Dee is a perfect publication that sheds light to the reader on the various social, political and moral issues that existed in China decades ago and the ways of resolving them. Comparing the legal issues in China decades ago, a thin line can be drawn. This is inherently because nothing much has changed in terms social, political and moral perspectives. The celebrated cases of Judge Dee borrow a lot from the Chinese culture, which defines the standard morals and values for its people. Consequently, the legal system in this nation appears to rely wholly on the defined moral standards in reprimanding wrongdoers.
The second type of subject matter jurisdiction is diversity jurisdiction. Diversity jurisdiction applies if the parties are citizens are different states and the amount in controversy is more than $75,000. The case has complete diversity as all three parties are citizens of different states; however, the amount in controversy is not more than $75,000. While Sally and Randy together have claims amounting to more than $75,000, the amount of the claims cannot be combined as the defendants are not jointly liable for the breaches. Therefore, Quincy has sought to recover $65,000 in damages from Randy and $45,000 in damages from Sandy of which the amounts are not over $75,000 individually, and therefore do not qualify for diversity jurisdiction.
Q1 THE COURT/S IN WHICH THE CASE WAS HEARD (OUTLINE THE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION OF THE COURT)
was clear in his dissenting opinion of the current appeal court and the lower court that the area of
The life of every American citizen, whether they realize it or not, is influenced by one entity--the United States Supreme Court. This part of government ensures that the freedoms of the American people are protected by checking the laws that are passed by Congress and the actions taken by the President. While the judicial branch may have developed later than its counterparts, many of the powers the Supreme Court exercises required years of deliberation to perfect. In the early years of the Supreme Court, one man’s judgement influenced the powers of the court systems for years to come. John Marshall was the chief justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835, and as the only lasting Federalist influence in a newly Democratic-Republican government, he and his fellow justices sought to perpetuate their Federalist principles in the United States’ court system. In one of the most memorable court cases of all time--the case of Marbury v. Madison-- Marshall established the idea of judicial review and strengthened the power of the judicial branch in the government. Abiding by his Federalist ideals, Marshall decided cases that would explicitly limit the power of the state government and broaden the strengths of the national government. Lastly, the Marshall Court was infamous for determining the results of cases that dealt with the interpretation of the Constitution and the importance of contracts in American society. The Marshall Court, over the span of a mere three decades, managed to influence the life of every American citizen even to this day by impacting the development of the judicial branch, establishing a boundary between the state and national government, and making declarations on the sanctity of contracts ("The Marshall Court"...
The Curious Confusion Surrounding Escobedo v. Illinois. (1965). The University of CHicago Law Review, 560-580.
Renwick, J. (2013, July 30). Portion Cap Rule Appeals Court Ruling. Retrieved December 1, 2013, from http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2013/2013_05505.htm
Most countries in the world today do not use juries, and only a small percentage of cases in the United States are decided by juries. So it has been proven successful and holding trials without juries are certainly a possibility for our future. In may in fact be in society’s best interest to change or rather improve a system that is outdated and doesn’t always serve the people justice. A person has a right to choose between a jury of his peers of a bench (judge only) trial. It’s likely that citizens may prefer a jury trial as they may feel that pool of random citizens may be less critical or harsh than a judge, but in all honesty, if we’re talking about fairness, a judge who is an informed and trained professional definitely has a better idea of how to sentence a person on trial and looks at the evidence in a holistic way. A bench trial is better because it’s more efficient and cost-effective, judges are well-educated professionals, and juries may be biased or incompetent.
The lower courts are bound by the House of Lords so they have to apply
part of the Doctrine Hedley Byrne and Co. Ltd V Heller and. Partners Ltd (1964), Rondel V Worsley (1969).
The book of Judges tells of an era in Israel in which the people of the land had no king. This book follows the incidents of twelve individuals whom were selected by God and shown favor to lead the Israelites out of the hands of the oppressors of their days. A judge is a military official known for his or her bravery in battles or incidents and nothing more than a mere warlord. This individual was given authority over decision-making and political squabbles among the people of Israel since there was no king. A judge would arise in the time of need and lead the tribe or tribes to victory over their enemies. God would show favor unto the judges and they would lead the people of Israel for their lifetime. The book of Judges displays an era of chaos in which the people of Israel did what was right in their opinion. This period is full of utter chaos in which the lack of leadership led to idolatry, rape, murder, the absence of unity among the tribes, and disorder. The last verse in Judges reads, “In those days there was no king in Israel; all the people did what right in their own eyes” (21:25), this conclusion is perfect for a book whose entire writings describe a time of such turmoil.
the ratio of one judge in a case is different from others in the same