Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect Of Technology On Society
Effect Of Technology On Society
Effect Of Technology On Society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As human beings, our personalities determine our actions. In the novel, “A Judgment in Stone” by Ruth Rendell, Eunice Parchman and Joan Smith both possess two distinct personalities that fuel their hatred of the Coverdale family. Because of Eunice’s illiteracy and Joan’s insanity, they develop a mutual friendship that proves to be fatal for the Coverdale family.
Eunice Parchman’s illiteracy drives her to kill the Coverdale family and leads to the discovery of her crime. Eunice is accused by Rendell of killing the Coverdale family because she cannot read or write (1). Because of the war, Eunice never learned to read, and as a result, she has shut herself out of the world. Rendell states at the opening of the novel, “Literacy is one of the
…show more content…
Eunice’s spark for revenge against the Coverdale family comes when Melinda Coverdale discovers her inability to read. Eunice, in fear that news of her illiteracy will spread, resorts to blackmailing: “If you tell anyone I’m what you said, that word, I’ll tell your dad you’ve been going with that boy and you are going to have a baby” (134). After being fired for attempting to blackmail Melinda, Eunice, along with her friend Joan, decides to wreck the Coverdale house. In fear of the Coverdale family calling the police, “so in so” severs the phone lines, and thus disables the family’s ability to call for aid. Eunice continues her rampage by killing the Coverdales. Rendell proves her earlier description of Eunice’s imagination being dried up by illiteracy through Eunice’s thoughts of the family as she murders them: “In those moments the words they cried and their pleas passed over her almost unheard, and by some strange metamorphosis, produced in Eunice’s brain, they ceased to be people and became the printed word. They were those things in the bookcases, those patchy black blocks on white paper, eternally her enemies, hated and desired” (155). Because of her lack of emotion towards the murdered family, Eunice is able to …show more content…
Valentine Day Massacre of the Coverdale family and in her induction into a coma. Joan, unlike Eunice, had a relatively comfortable childhood. Joan was afforded, by her parents, the best opportunities for education, but left it all in pursuit of a married man and prostitution (66-67). Throughout the novel, Joan uses fake clichés from the Bible and her past sins of prostitution and adultery to justifiably portray herself as being redeemed by God. Joan uses her religion, and by extension God himself, to express her feelings; Rendell detests to her behavior: “A devout woman must not be uncharitable, so she seldom indulged her dislike of people by straight malicious gossip. It was not she who found fault with them and hated them, but God; not she but God whom they had inflicted imaginary injuries…Joan Smith was merely his humble and energetic instrument” (62). Joan fabricates from the Bible upon learning that Mr. Coverdale does not want her in his house anymore: “Woe to him whom the Lord despiseth!” (102). Unlike Eunice, Joan, when killing the Coverdale family, loses what little sanity she retains to religious insincerity. Joan crackles, “I am the instrument of the One Above” (185), while murdering the Coverdales. Unlike Eunice, who wants to escape unnoticed, Joan desires to proclaim her “victory over the enemies of God” to everyone. Joan’s insanity and
Have you ever had something of great value be taken from you and then feeling emotionally empty? In Celia Garth, Gwen Bristow desires to share the important message of Celia Garth’s past to the characters and readers. Memories prove that Celia got through the war and the bells provided a stress free period. Her memories were resembled through the bells of St.Michaels Church. The past demonstrated in Celia’s eyes about the war and what the bells reminded her of.
In his book, An Imperfect God, Henry Wiencek argues in favor of Washington being the first true president to set the precedent for the emancipation of African-American slaves. Wiencek delves into the evil paradox of how a nation conceived on the principles of liberty and dedicated to the statement that all men are created equal was in a state that still preserved slavery for over seven decades following the construction of the nation. Washington’s grandeur estate at Mount Vernon at its peak had the upkeep of over 300 slaves 126 of which were owned by Washington. First, it must be understood that Washington was raised on slavery receiving ownership of 10 slaves at the age of 11 years old and that Washington was a man of his time. However, it must also be understood that Washington’s business with slavery was in the context of a constrained social and political environment. Weincek maintains that this does not exonerate the fact that Washington maintained slavery however; it does help to quantify the moral shortcoming by which Washington carried until his last year of life.
Eunice was taken by a woman from the Mohawk tribe who came to Deerfield in search of a child in which to replace the child she had lost. In essence, a war broke out because many Mohawks were in search of a new replacement for the people that they lost due to an “untimely death” (pg. 223). Because this is a practice that is part of the Mohawk customs and culture, this may explain the reason for why Mohawk natives attacked Deerfield and furthermore, “explains why so many of the captives who did stay in New France remained with the Mohawks” (pg. 223). Maybe, this is why Eunice was treated well by her mistress. If the Mohawks were looking for replacements, they would have probably treated their captives with more respect. By doing so, this would give their captives a reason to remain with them. If the Mohawks were to mistreat their captives,
Divided Minds was an intriguing story plot, endowing readers to divulge into the mindset of twin sisters, Pamela and Carolyn Spiro, and their daily struggles within Mental Health. Co-authors and staring twin sister, Pamela and Carolyn fabricated their personal diaries into a lifelong audience, disclosing personal issues, feelings, and emotions throughout their lifetime. However one predominant issues within the mental health field revolved around the symptoms and diagnosis of Schizophrenia, where Pamela expressed her vacillating struggles with multiple symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, and grossly disorganized behavior, to her economic and social predicaments.
Thomas Putnam plays a major role in the Salem witch hunt in Arthur Miller's The Crucible. Inheriting a handsome amount of property makes Putnam a wealthy person; however, it doesn't seem to satisfy his ambition. After the town terribly rejected Putnam's brother-in-law, Bayley, Putnam's bitterness has increased. Finally his prodigious involvement in the relentless accusations places him in the center of the spot light, making him a salient character in both the play and the indignant period of the American history.
The central theme in “A Jury of Her Peers” is the place of women in society and especially the isolation this results in. We see this through the character, Minnie Foster and her isolation from love, happiness, companionship and from society as a whole. Not only does the story describe this isolation but it allows the reader to feel the impact of this isolation and recognize the tragedy of the situation.
Glaspell spent more than forty years working as a journalist, fiction writer, playwright and promoter of various artistic. She is a woman who lived in a male dominated society. She is the author of a short story titled A Jury of Her Peers. She was inspired to write this story when she investigated in the homicide of John Hossack, a prosperous county warren who had been killed in his sleep(1).Such experience in Glaspell’s life stimulated inspiration. The fact that she was the first reporter on scene, explains that she must have found everything still in place, that makes an incredible impression. She feels what Margaret (who is Minnie Wright in the story) had gone through, that is, she has sympathy for her. What will she say about Margaret? Will she portray Margaret as the criminal or the woman who’s life has been taken away? In the short story Minnie Wright was the victim. Based on evidence at the crime scene, it is clear that Minnie has killed her husband; however, the women have several reasons for finding her “not guilty” of the murder of John Wright.
Evaluation of an assumption can be done with data collection and analysis. To evaluate Dr. Napier’s philosophical assumption that we marry or partner with our “worst nightmare,” I would suggest using almost any information that demonstrates patterns of behavior associated with personality psychology, and information that can be gathered systematically through observation and measurement also known as scientific method. I would confer with books written by experts in the field of experiential therapy with couples, articles from social science journals, and legal statistics representative of the population experiencing a high rate of divorce as a result of irreconcilable differences.
In Susan Glaspell’s “A Jury of Her Peers”, female characters face inequality in a society dominated by the opinions of their husbands. The women struggle to decide where their loyalty rests and the fate of a fellow woman. Aided by memories and their own lifestyles the women realize their ties to a woman held for murder, Minnie Foster Wright. Through a sympathetic connection these women, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters have greater loyalty to a fellow woman than to their husbands and even the law; this greater loyalty ultimately shows the inequality between genders.
Harriet Jacobs’ feminist approach to her autobiographical narrative Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl brought to life the bondage placed on women, in particular enslaved black women, during the nineteenth-century America. In an effort to raise awareness about the conditions of enslaved women and to promote the cause of abolition, Jacobs decided to have her personal story of sexual exploitation and escape published. The author’s slave narrative focuses on the experiences of women, the treatment of sexual exploitation, its importance on family life and maternal principles, and its appeal to white, female readers. Likewise, through the use of the Feminist/Gender Theory, issues relating to gender and sexuality can be applied to the author’s slave narrative. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl and its lack of reception during its own time disclose the strict boundaries and unique challenges Harriet Jacobs encountered and overcame as a woman in antebellum America.
The novel shadows the life of Janie Crawford pursuing the steps of becoming the women that her grandmother encouraged her to become. By the means of doing so, she undergoes a journey of discovering her authentic self and real love. Despise the roller-coaster obstacles, Janie Crawford’s strong-will refuses to get comfortable with remorse, hostility, fright, and insanity.
In the story “Two Kinds”, the author, Amy Tan, intends to make reader think of the meaning behind the story. She doesn’t speak out as an analyzer to illustrate what is the real problem between her and her mother. Instead, she uses her own point of view as a narrator to state what she has experienced and what she feels in her mind all along the story. She has not judged what is right or wrong based on her opinion. Instead of giving instruction of how to solve a family issue, the author chooses to write a narrative diary containing her true feeling toward events during her childhood, which offers reader not only a clear account, but insight on how the narrator feels frustrated due to failing her mother’s expectations which leads to a large conflict between the narrator and her mother.
Hester Prynne lived in a society of the Puritans. Puritans stuck to their beliefs and heavily enforced them. She was forced to follow these laws, and couldn’t break free. Hester became the biggest symbol of sin once she had committed the most impure action of all, adultery. She had become a figure of evil and was shamed upon for the rest of her life. Yet, in all of the shame she lived through, she was able to become a stronger woman. The “A”, the symbol of sin began to mean much more to her than just a sin. It cleared up her imagery, gave her the ability to see things others couldn’t. Doing what was seen as the most evil possible sin, she couldn’t possibly do anything worse.
...t, cruel, and even emotionless. However, this is far from true. Louise Mallard may have been relieved to hear about her husband’s death and she may have died of the disappointment at hearing he was actually alive, but she is only human. She desires freedom from oppression and freedom to be her own woman. She cares deeply for her husband, but he tied her down in a way that she did not like. The weight was far too much to bear, despite what feelings she held for Brently Mallard. She has a wide range of emotions, including the grief toward the death of Mr. Mallard. Mrs. Mallard’s thoughts and feelings are no different than those belonging to any other person.
In life it is important that each person thinks rationally in every decision they make, but it is equally important that everyone follows their heart, too. For some people, thinking rationally while following their heart is not an easy task, and it often causes more tragedy than good. Thomas Hardy, a famous British author, repeatedly wrote novels depicting the cross between logical thinking and following one’s heart. For example, his first novel, Far from the Madding Crowd, involves a love circle during a period when women were trying to prove their independence. Bathsheba, the main character, manages a farm on her own and strives to continuously prove her dominance in a male dominant world. She finds herself distracted and stressed due to the fact that three men wish to marry her. Bathsheba significantly wishes to keep her independence, so she turns down the first two men. However, Troy, an untrustworthy womanizer, steals her heart for a moment until she again thinks realistic enough to not fall under his love traps. Far from the Madding Crowd, by Thomas Hardy, depicts the cross between thinking both rationally and irrationally once love is present in one’s life, which is common in all of Hardy’s books through the character development, central themes involving love, and gender confusion.