Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nora's character traits in A Doll's House
A doll house and society
Nora's character traits in A Doll's House
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nora's character traits in A Doll's House
Have you ever found yourself comparing who you are as a person or something you do to that of another person? Throughout Ibsen’s play A Doll’s House, Ibsen focuses on conflict arising through comparing and contrasting characters. The composed characters of the text provide societal structure of the specific time period of the 1870’s and many gender and household roles, therefore giving readers an insight to the conflict that arises throughout the desires in life as well as what is expected from society. Ibsen creates foils between key characters to highlight the true intentions of each to reveal that personal values and societal expectations are often in conflict. The contradicting characters of Mrs. Linden and Nora are introduced to readers …show more content…
Torvald even describes to Nora the influence her father has had on her life in saying, “You're a strange little being! Just like your father- always on the look-out for all the money you can lay your hands on; but the moment you have it, it seems to slip through your fingers; you never know what becomes of it. Well, one must take you as you are. It's in the blood. Yes, Nora, that sort of thing is hereditary.” (3) Through Torvald expressing to Nora the influence her father has had on Nora’s outlook of society, the influence of Torvald is juxtaposed to readers of his description of Nora’s father to …show more content…
Torvald also judges the acts of Krogstad, therefore comparing himself to another man in the perception of society. Torvald says to Nora, “It generally comes from the mother's side; but of course the father's influence may act in the same way. Every lawyer knows it too well. And here has this Krogstad been poisoning his own children for years past by a life of lies and hypocrisy- that is why I call him morally ruined. [Holds out both hands to her.] So my sweet little Nora must promise not to plead his cause. Shake hands upon it. Come, come, what's this? Give me your hand.” (18) The irony of Torvald comparing works of Krogstad and the similar social status of events and characters is uncanny. Torvald is judging the way Krogstad goes about life, however, Torvald is in turn following the stereotypes set through Nora’s father and the social demand and therefore providing conflict in Nora’s
Nora Helmer was a delicate character and she relied on Torvald for her identity. This dependence that she had kept her from having her own personality. Yet when it is discovered that Nora only plays the part of the good typical housewife who stays at home to please her husband, it is then understandable that she is living not for herself but to please others. From early childhood Nora has always held the opinions of either her father or Torvald, hoping to please them. This mentality makes her act infantile, showing that she has no ambitions of her own. Because she had been pampered all of her life, first by her father and now by Torvald, Nora would only have to make a cute animal sound to get what she wanted from Torvald, “If your little squirrel were to ask you for something very, very, prettily” (Ibsen 34) she said.
...y Torvald: “He used to call me his doll-child, and he played with me the way I played with my dolls…I went from Papa’s hands into yours. You arranged everything to your own taste, and so I got the same taste as you-or I pretended to… Now when I look back it seems I have lived here like a beggar-just from hand to mouth” (Ibsen 109). Rather than be “sheltered” (Ibsen 108) by him unlike Gilman’s character, Nora is able to speak up for herself and confront her past.
Krogstad is different from Torvald because he is not as well off economically and socially and this leads him to try an extremer form of manipulation. Krogstad is desperate to keep his job at the bank and tries to get Nora to secure the job with her husband through blackmail. Since he was once found to be forging documents, his reputation has been flaky, so in order to regain his reputation for his sons: "For their sake I must win back as much respect as I can in the town" (22), he needs to keep his job at the bank.
The manner in which Torvald talks down to his wife and the apparent. unopposed acceptance of this by his wife, is evidence that, at least. Initially, power firmly rests in the grip of Nora’s husband. Nora’s language is full of indefinite, qualitative statements, demonstrated. especially when talking about Torvald's salary, however, when Torvald speaks.
Torvald is constantly referring to her through the use of pet names such as (quote pet names from book) and only ever refers to her by name when he is scolding her. Not only does Torvald see her as his doll, but also as her child (quote near end of story). By keeping Nora dependent and obedient to him, he plays the role of Nora’s second father. Nora eventually sees that her daughter is being treated in the same manner that she was her entire life, as a doll. In comes Mrs. Linde, Nora’s childhood best friend, whom she greats rather hesitantly.
Torvald explained to Nora that keeping Krogstad on at the bank would appear to others that he is easily swayed by his wife. Torvald has also complained about Krogstad’s use of his first name at the bank. Of course, Torvald’s true feelings about his appearance come out explicitly during his fit of rage in the end. Torvald is excessively consumed with how others view him and has no moral objections to having his wife perform sultry dances in front of other men.
Patriarchy's socialization of women into servicing creatures is the major accusation in Nora's painful account to Torvald of how first her father, and then he, used her for their amusement. . . how she had no right to think for herself, only the duty to accept their opinions. Excluded from meaning anything, Nora has never been subject, only object. (Templeton 142).
...t to blackmail to bring about his desires. However, when one learns more about Krogstad, one sees that he is desperately trying to prove himself to his society in order that he may support his children. Krogstad became a social outcast because society was unforgiving. It could not forgive Krogstad for committing a crime for a greater good. Krogstad becomes redeemed by love and learns to forgive. He forgives Christine for forsaking him; he also forgives Nora of her debt. While Torvald is ungrateful of his wife’s love, Krogstad appreciates the new life given to him and is resolved to reform his life. Furthermore, Krogstad serves as the catalyst which prompts the process of Nora’s maturation. In the process, he has also changed into becoming a kinder man. By the end of the play, the future looks bright and promising for Krogstad as he begins a new life with Christine.
an example of the individual’s struggle against society” (Mitchell 136). She was punished severely for something that could be considered a petty crime and the crime ultimately led to her and Torvald’s separation and her leaving the house. In addition, “Christine Linde and Nils Krogstad’s subplot ending in marriage happens at the same time as Nora’s break with Torvald.” (Davies 51) The sharp contrast between the two creates conflict within the audience members because Krogstad is being rewarded for blackmail as Nora is being punished for saving her husband’s life.
A contrasting difference in the characters, are shown not in the characters themselves, but the role that they play in their marriages. These women have different relationships with their husbands. Torvald and Nora have a relationship where there is no equality. To Torvald Nora is an object. Hence, she plays the submissive role in a society where the lady plays the passive role. Her most important obligation is to please Torvald, making her role similar to a slave. He too considers himself superior to her.
Torvald is the only one in the family who works and provides for his family who needs to survive in their lifestyle. Because of this, Nora must always go and ask for money from Torvald, hoping for his acceptance of her using his income. Nora also had no possessions to her name because when a woman got married, all her possessions were considered under the control of her new husband.... ... middle of paper ...
Torvald is extremely cautious about how he is perceived by other people. He would do anything to keep his honourable image, even if it involves him doing something dishonourable. Another way the relationship between Nora and Torvald will end is from Nora’s desire for her own identity. Even though it might seem that without Krogstad’s extortion plan, Nora would have never developed her need for an identity, but she has shown signs of a new identity well before Krogstad tried to extort Nora from his job.
Patriarchy's socialization of women into servicing creatures is the major accusation in Nora's painful account to Torvald of how first her father, and then he, used her for their amusement. . . how she had no right to think for herself, only the duty to accept their opinions. Excluded from meaning anything, Nora has never been subject, only object. (Templeton 142).
“A Doll’s House” is unique in a way that it seems to explore aspects of feminism, such as the independent woman, although critics and Ibsen himself would have argued otherwise considering it to be more of a social commentary centred upon role playing in society. For this very reason, “A Doll’s House” can be seen as being relevant to twenty-first century society, since society will always attempt group people together, whether categorizing by gender, morality or wealth. The very fact that the themes presented were controversial during the Ibsen’s time, and are yet of concern in modern society make it one of the most influential plays ever written.
She argues, “I have been your doll-wife, just as at home I was papa’s doll-child” (Ibsen 76). Torvald’s decision to berate Nora caused her to realize how one-sided her relationship with Torvald was. Nora addresses Torvald, “You have never loved me. You have only thought it pleasant to be in love with me” (Ibsen 76). Ultimately, it was Torvald’s actions and words, or the lack thereof that caused Nora to lose her feelings for