A Critique Of Robert Luce's Negative Talk

747 Words2 Pages

If you ask ten people what's the hardest part of their job, about 9 of them will say something along the lines of "giving bad news." From firing people to having serious performance conversations, letting employees know when the company's not doing well to explaining a screw-up to the press - these are the times that make most leaders want to go home and pull the covers up over their heads. Receiving bad news is never one of life’s delights, but how is it for those whose job it is to deliver the bad news? How do they—judges, doctors, first responders, even wedding planners—survive the tough speeches day after day? Past experiences tell us that the best way to deliver bad news to anyone is to be objective and stay positive.
Luce begins her speech the way most people would - buttering up the audience. With this method, she can ease the blow of her criticism so it's not as harsh. When delivering criticism or bad news, it is always best to start with something good. For example, when friends want others to tell them when they do wrong, they also want some kind of encouragement along the way. Negative talk can beat a person down and cause them to not listen to what you have to say. Luce …show more content…

She makes sure they understand why and for what reason she is there, speaking in front of them. In the fourth paragraph, she starts talking about journalism and what it's about. She explains what it is and how it touches public interest. This is important in her speech because the audience needed a little reminder what what it should be. She goes on to say how they have put lies in their writings. As commonly known, lies in the public eye is one of the worst things to do. Take Hillary Clinton for example. Many people believe she was not elected president because she lied and hid things from others; she is known for her act of deleting emails. People value the honesty Trump has more than the lies Clinton

Open Document