Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of journalism on society
The impact of journalism on society
Media ethics importance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of journalism on society
If you ask ten people what's the hardest part of their job, about 9 of them will say something along the lines of "giving bad news." From firing people to having serious performance conversations, letting employees know when the company's not doing well to explaining a screw-up to the press - these are the times that make most leaders want to go home and pull the covers up over their heads. Receiving bad news is never one of life’s delights, but how is it for those whose job it is to deliver the bad news? How do they—judges, doctors, first responders, even wedding planners—survive the tough speeches day after day? Past experiences tell us that the best way to deliver bad news to anyone is to be objective and stay positive.
Luce begins her speech the way most people would - buttering up the audience. With this method, she can ease the blow of her criticism so it's not as harsh. When delivering criticism or bad news, it is always best to start with something good. For example, when friends want others to tell them when they do wrong, they also want some kind of encouragement along the way. Negative talk can beat a person down and cause them to not listen to what you have to say. Luce
…show more content…
took that into consideration because she wants them to listen to all that she says, but doesn't want them to think she wanted to do this. She tells them they asked for it - they wanted her to throw rocks at them. She is not deliberately going out of her way to talk badly amongst her audience. Unfortunately, there are far too many examples of this people speaking poorly to their audience - bad news being downplayed, blamed on someone else, or simply lied about. One of the most shocking would be former CEO's Tony Hayward's handling of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, in which 11 people lost their lives and billions of gallons of oil ended up in the Gulf of Mexico. As the disaster came about, Hayward explained the spill as "relatively tiny" in comparison with the size of the ocean, saying that the environmental impact of the Gulf spill would likely be "very very modest." Most importantly, even when he apologized, he did it with a self-centered twist that made everyone cringe, saying "I'm sorry. I'd like my life back." This kind of talking will bring forth hate and cause people to ignore what is being said. Luce identifies the specific action in which she is giving forth her criticism.
She makes sure they understand why and for what reason she is there, speaking in front of them. In the fourth paragraph, she starts talking about journalism and what it's about. She explains what it is and how it touches public interest. This is important in her speech because the audience needed a little reminder what what it should be. She goes on to say how they have put lies in their writings. As commonly known, lies in the public eye is one of the worst things to do. Take Hillary Clinton for example. Many people believe she was not elected president because she lied and hid things from others; she is known for her act of deleting emails. People value the honesty Trump has more than the lies Clinton
has. Luce is extremely straightforward and honest with her audience. She refuses to give them sugarcoated criticism because that is not very beneficial in the end. Giving someone criticism is fine until one tries to sugarcoat it because then it's basically a lie. In the third paragraph of her speech, she tells them that they should not except buttered up or played down faults because it is not the truth. Many people are very reluctant when it comes to giving critical feedback. This is because they're so uncomfortable with the emotions that can arise from it—their own and others’. Most people hate to offend or hurt others' feelings, which only causes more issues. Usually, the safer option is to simply say nothing, let people continue on as they are, and just hope they’ll eventually realize how their behavior is hurting them and impacting others. Unfortunately, problematic behaviors that may seem obvious to certain people are rarely obvious to the person exhibiting them. Let’s face it - if it were easy to see how our actions limited our success we’d be more proactive in changing them.
After the Watergate Scandal in 1972, the House Judiciary Committee needed to decide whether or not to start the process of impeaching President Nixon. As a new member of the committee, it was Barbara Jordan’s job to convince everyone else to vote for the impeachment of Nixon. In Jordan’s speech, pathos is effectively used to persuade the House Judiciary Committee to impeach President Nixon. Through the use of rhetorical questions, repetition, first person pronouns, and dramatic imagery Jordan impacts her audience’s opinion on the impeachment of Nixon.
Dolores Huerta starts off her speech by establishing her credibility. “I know that we have been through
Luce begins her speech by self-contradicting herself about feeling "happy" and "flattered" which she later advances to say that she is feeling "less happy" therefore giving off the impression that her speech won't be as positive as they may assume it to be. She makes sure to reassures them by stating that they have asked for her opinion on "what's wrong" with the American Press.
She then immediately follows up with a way to fix it and demand respect. Shes trying to connect with the audience and shows that she has been in the same place, that she can relate. You can see that she has done her research, she uses plenty of statistics to give you a visual of what she is talking about as well as quoting people from organizations and giving them the appropriate credit. She mentions in 2005 at yale, her alma mater, 15 students sat in the admissions office until they were removed by police. These individuals were demanding changes to the financial aid policy.
...n our country. She’s saying that the advancement of women is getting stuck between a rock and a hard place. This was such a strong point in her speech because it shed light into the logical thinking, and made a historical connection to slavery. By making this connection, she was able to help many see that women were convicted slaves to the current state of the union.
Brene Brown main point about her speech is vulnerability. Her main point of this is to understand or know what he feel and to embrace that in us. We shouldn't brig ourselves down thinking that are emotions how we feel about things makes us weak. It makes us stronger and we realize how when we feel vulnerable we need to take action and defeat it. We also need to be aware that when people see that your vulnerability they can easily target you to bring you down making you feel less confident.
To summarize this analysis, Hillary Clinton shows us how as we unite, the stronger our bond is. She uses clever ways to show this action. Though she did not win this presidential election, she is still loved by many. She helped herself because of the way she wrote and persuaded people to join her. Using rhetorical appeals
The best way to examine this speech is through a speech-act methodology. Speaker-setting and speaker-audience relationships are key in the analysis of this situation. Before answering the proposed research question we can ask another important question. Why did former President Bill Clinton choose to give this address? According to the Hart text several things must be true. 1. The speaker feels something is wrong. After several rounds of questioning the American public was growing ti...
Primarily he starts out his address by speaking directly to his audience, the American people. He states: “We know we share this pain with all of the people of our country. This is truly a national loss.” By doing so he establishes who his intended audience is, which is very important in a speech like this. It helps the audience feel a greater connection to the speaker since he is addressing them directly and relating to them.
Throughout the world, most people believe in some type of god or gods, and the majority of them understand God as all-good, all-knowing (omniscient), and all-powerful (omnipotent). However, there is a major objection to the latter belief: the “problem of evil” (P.O.E.) argument. According to this theory, God’s existence is unlikely, if not illogical, because a good, omniscient, and omnipotent being would not allow unnecessary suffering, of which there are enormous amounts.
The goal of Hillary’s speech is to persuade her audience that her ideas are valid, by using ethos, pathos, and logos. Hillary is the First Lady and Senator, she shows credibility as an influential activist for woman rights. “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families. Over the past two and a half years, I’ve had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my country and around the world” (Clinton 2).
The opening of Clintons speech effectively captures the audience’s attention; Clinton begins her speech with;
Pointing out how she lies more than pinocchio, with one main example being her lying about her using her private email server. Being deemed “extremely careless,” by the FBI because of how she intentionally deleted tons and thousands of classified information (Kozak 2016). With that only just being a small fraction of the pie, my campaign team would gather up all the lies she’s ever told put it in an ad showing how she’s not trustworthy. How she would lie and hide things from the citizens if she were to take the Oval Office this coming January, discrediting her
Sheryl Sandberg came to Ted to give a speech in 2010. She had a story about her preschool daughter and asked Pat, the CEO if she could add it to her speech. Pat responded with “Absolutely tell that story.” That’s when Sandberg then realized she could help others especially, woman by being honest about her own experiences and challenges. Sheryl Sandberg says “I tried to be authentic and share my truth”. She also says “she feels short of doing it all and it felt good to not only admit it to others but herself.” When you give a speech you should always want to be authentic, open, and transparent. Allowing yourself to do this will allow the audience to listen and understand what you’re opening up about during the speech. If you’re not authentic
Her saying that her family votes on which movie they watch, lets me see how democratic she is because even though she’s the mom and she can do whatever she wants because she’s the boss, she let the majority vote win the movie choice. Secondly, I asked her about Donald Trump being our president and if she thinks our democracy is at stake with him in office, I’ve never heard her opinion on our controversial president so I thought I should take advantage of this moment and ask her. Which she answered with, “Him as our president can make it better because people will want to revolt and we can get mad enough to make a change.” I never thought about it this way and I love how optimistic she was with this question. Whereas I saw him as the worst decision ever made, she saw it as an opportunity for change. I ended the interview with asking her if the American democracy has changed since she was younger. She said it seems a lot faster with the internet/ social media and there are a lot more opinions. I knew she was going to bring up social media considering the fact that social media has taken over society since she was