A Criticism of the Manifesto of the Communist Party

763 Words2 Pages

Marx, in the late 1840’s, outlines most of his economic philosophy in the Manifesto of the Communist Party. He leads us through his materialistic conception of history, outlining the major class difference between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. He transitions this into a more teleological argument of the necessary evolution from the bonds of capitalistic slavery to communism, and criticizes all modern versions of socialism. Concluding with statements relating the modern communism movement to his underlying philosophy, Marx brings full circle the cry for a communist revolution. This paper will both argue for the validity of the materialistic conception of history based on division of labor and the rise of the proletarian as a force, and justify Marx’s brutal criticism of other types of socialism. However, Marx’s flips into praising communism as the inherent answer to economic and societal problems, and even states a list of short-term demands. Communism’s rise from the ashes of failed capitalism will be shown to be a perhaps misguided attempt at corralling the current and future intrinsic problems of capitalism into an impossible generalization impractical in the face of the modern relative luxury of the American Proletariat. Marx leaves us with unanswered questions as to the practicality and implementation (as well as perhaps the need) of a communist fix to capitalism’s complications.
In the first section entitled “Bourgeois and Proletarians,” Marx expounds on his view of the past as the “history of class struggles” (Tucker, 473). He introduces in the first few sentences the key division of the oppressor and the oppressed. For his purposes, the oppressor is considered the dominant class in a society, and the oppre...

... middle of paper ...

... productive he becomes is crucial in understanding the basic failing points of capitalism. Marx rails against capitalism as rendering the proletarian equivalent to merely “an appendage of the machine.” This oppression does not end in the workplace, with landlords and other merchants being cited as further instruments in completing the circle of bourgeois oppression.

Works Cited

Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The Marx-Engels Reader. Ed. Robert C. Tucker. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 1978. Print.

Smirniotopoulos, Peter. "Is the U.S. Capitalist, Socialist or Something In-between? Newgeography.com." Newgeography. 06 Dec. 2008. Web. 23 Jan. 2012. .

SparkNotes Editors. “SparkNote on The Communist Manifesto.” SparkNotes.com.
SparkNotes LLC. n.d.. Web. 23 Jan. 2012.

Open Document