Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on how Harriet Tubman impacted the world
An essay on how Harriet Tubman impacted the world
An essay on how Harriet Tubman impacted the world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on how Harriet Tubman impacted the world
I must admit, when I first heard the Treasury was replacing Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill, I didn’t care. I’m a busy person; as long as I can spend it, I’m happy. After reading about Andrew Jackson, I don’t have any issues with him being on our currency, but I do not believe he should be sharing a bill with a Civil Rights hero. Jackson had a hard start in life, and I feel that affected his actions later, as an adult. While I may not agree with some of his exploits, I do believe he played an important role in the growth of this country. As uncomfortable as it may be, most countries are built on the blood of their prior inhabitants; this includes the United States. With that said, there is no reason for Harriet Tubman to …show more content…
With his father recently deceased, his mother, Elizabeth Hutchinson Jackson, was forced to live with family. Because of this, Jackson’s mother had to earn her families room and board by working for her relatives. He was surrounded by family, but never really fit in. I believe this led to an inferiority complex in Jackson; causing aggression and the need to “one up” everyone. As a child, he was constantly fighting; trying to prove his strength and worth. It is said, that Jackson would get so worked up he would be “slobbering”. It is my opinion that this is where Jackson started building his legendary personality; dominating those around him with his charisma or hostility. I believe it is because of this personality he accomplished so many things; it is also what led him to treat those he saw as “beneath him” so poorly. (Meacham …show more content…
He drew up The Treaty of New Echota; this treaty would give the remaining Cherokee land to the United States. Knowing they had no authority over the Cherokee Nation, Jackson had a small group of Cherokee men sign the treaty. In March of 1836, he submitted the treaty to the Senate and they approved it. On September 28, 1836, the Cherokees appointed a committee, led by Chief John Ross, to take their complaints to Congress. The letter to Congress expressed both anger and sadness by stating “We are denationalized; we are disfranchised; we are deprived of membership in the human family; we have neither land, nor home, nor resting place, that can be called our
Before Andrew Jackson became president, John Quincy Adams was president. Both of them have many differences such as life and political ideology. First, Adams came from an aristocratic family and had good political connection because of his father's, John Adams, who was a former president and also one of the founding fathers. Andrew Jackson was born as a commoner. Unlike Adams, Jackson did not receive education but instead joined the military life, fought in wars and became a national hero. John Q. Adam became president first before Jackson did. However, Adam only served one term during his presidency. Jackson served two during his. Both of their political views are different but both wanted to lead the country. Adams focused more on the country's
Awarded the prestigious honor to remain forever engraved on the twenty dollar bill, Andrew Jackson became a figure in American history never forgotten. Future generations of younger students will not need to know Andrew for them to assume he was a great man. Unfortunately, the ignorance of idolizing Jackson because he appears on American currency serves to blanket the realities of his administration. Jackson should be removed from the twenty dollar bill.
The generalization that, “The decision of the Jackson administration to remove the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River in the 1830s was more a reformulation of the national policy that had been in effect since the 1790s than a change in that policy,” is valid. Ever since the American people arrived at the New World they have continually driven the Native Americans out of their native lands. Many people wanted to contribute to this removal of the Cherokees and their society. Knox proposed a “civilization” of the Indians. President Monroe continued Knox’s plan by developing ways to rid of the Indians, claiming it would be beneficial to all. Andrew Jackson ultimately fulfilled the plan. First of all, the map [Document A] indicates the relationship between time, land, and policies, which affected the Indians. The Indian Tribes have been forced to give up their land as early as the 1720s. Between the years of 1721 and 1785, the Colonial and Confederation treaties forced the Indians to give up huge portions of their land. During Washington's, Monroe's, and Jefferson's administration, more and more Indian land was being commandeered by the colonists. The Washington administration signed the Treaty of Holston and other supplements between the time periods of 1791 until 1798 that made the Native Americans give up more of their homeland land. The administrations during the 1790's to the 1830's had gradually acquired more and more land from the Cherokee Indians. Jackson followed that precedent by the acquisition of more Cherokee lands. In later years, those speaking on behalf of the United States government believed that teaching the Indians how to live a more civilized life would only benefit them. Rather than only thinking of benefiting the Indians, we were also trying to benefit ourselves. We were looking to acquire the Indians’ land. In a letter to George Washington, Knox says we should first is to destroy the Indians with an army, and the second is to make peace with them. The Indian Trade and Intercourse Act of 1793 began to put Knox’s plan into effect. The federal government’s promise of supplying the Indians with animals, agricultural tool...
middle of paper ... ... If Jackson did not change his view of life, work hard at everything he did, and excel at sports, who knows where he would be today? He could be sitting in a jail cell because he never changed his ways and lost his temper, or he could still be living in a small house in a small town.
Andrew Jackson is a strong independent man who makes decisions for himself and others no matter the consequences. However, Jackson has a polarizing personality that makes him hard to understand when it comes to his thought process. Andrew Jackson, a man of many colors shows his sensitive side around women and some can say his slaves, examples being his love for his wife and the way he sticks up for the integrity of Peggy Eaton. As a slave owner, he was a good master and only punished those that tried to escape his land and even then he would sell the slave off to another. Moreover, he is not afraid to show his tough exterior to enemies or to those he is acquainted with, as long as, he is fighting for what he believes is the best for the people
The best place to start is the beginning. The Jackson family immigrated from Ireland, leaving behind a world of hardships to try their luck in the New World. Life there would not be so easy and Andrew Jackson’s father would die before he was born. Jackson had two brothers, both older, and his mother. The worked on the farm on which they lived and it was not easy. Life would soon take a more difficult turn as the Revolution began. Historians say that some of the worst fighting seen during the war was experience right around where Jackson grew up in the Carolinas. This kind of violence that surrounded him surely influenced the man that Jackson became. His brother fell victim to the war and soon after his other brother and mother would die from disease leaving Jackson an orphan and forcing him to fend for himself. “A boy soldier during the American Revolution, he became the only president ...
...(Perdue 20). It gave them two years to prepare for removal. Many of the Cherokees, led by John Ross, protested this treaty. However, in the winter of 1838-1839, all of the Cherokees headed west toward Oklahoma. This removal of the Cherokees is now known, as the Trail of Tears was a very gruesome event. During the trip from the southern United States to current day Oklahoma, many of the Cherokees died. Shortly after their arrival in Oklahoma, they began to rebuild. They began tilling fields, sending their children to school, and attending Council meetings (Perdue 170).
Jackson was a self-centered, violent, and ruthless man who paid no attention to what was morally correct, only what he believed in. This man was a notorious gambler who was known to fight at the drop of a hat, and then drop the hat himself! And because he shut down the Central Bank, we entered into the Panic of 1837. Ironically, the same man who opposed paper money ended up on the 20-dollar bill! He completely ignored the Constitution, and the Supreme court on many occasions. And when he was elected into office, he replaced many smart able-bodied officials for unintelligent Jacksonian supporters. This was the kind of man that Jackson was. A man who made more than 4,000 Native Americans die on the Trail of Tears. Jackson was just an unintelligent common-man who managed to win the Presidency. And with it, he brought damage and death to many other people through his
Harriet received both notoriety and recognition for her courageous acts of kindness and civil disobedience. Many people were grateful for what all she did to save those slaves. What she accomplished did not make the laws of slavery change, but it did make people look at the situation itself more clearly. Because of what Harriet did she saved thousands and become known as the most successful conductor on the Underground Railroad. The U.S Treasury department released in April 2016 that Harriet Tubman might be the new face of the twenty dollar bill. She is still admired for her hard work and bravery today because without her people might not have given freedom a
Andrew Jackson became the United States of America’s seventh president in the year 1829. Born into poverty, Jackson received fame as a military hero and grew popular by representing the “common man”. He quickly became America's most influential political figure at the time. After such a polarizing career, Andrew Jackson was put onto the present day $20 dollar bill. In recent years there has been questioning by the american citizens about Andrew Jackson's qualifications. I agree that a man responsible for genocide and economic tolls on the country should not be represented on the bill.
However, in order to do this, he has to relocate the Indians to a different location. He decided to move them to present day Oklahoma. Document 3 is what a Cherokee Indian has to say. He says “ People feel bad when they have to leave Old Nation. Women’s cry and make sad wails, Children cry and many men cry… but they say nothing and just put their heads down and keep on going towards West. Many days pass and people die very much.” Jackson did not provide the Indians with enough supplies to keep them from starving and dying.
Jackson wants to find something that will make him feel like he has done something for his culture and his people. These sayings contradict his actions because every time he gets closer to gaining more money, he spends it. In the long run, Jackson’s pitfalls did not stop his determination to gain back the regalia and ultimately find his personal identity. Given that he is Native American, the reader might assume that Jackson has a feeling of resentment towards white people due to the displacement of his people. From the beginning of the story, Jackson reveals a protective feeling caused by white people.
Andrew Jackson should not be honored on the twenty dollar bill because he was cruel and an atrocious leader. First off, he ordered the killings of over 800 Creek warriors at the Battle of Horseshoe Bend in 1814. This action was exceedingly inappropriate and poor hearted. America should honor affectionate people with their currency, not cold blooded people like Andrew Jackson. Another reason Jackson should not be honored on the twenty dollar bill is he invaded the Seminoles in 1818, despite President James Monroe telling him not to. He should have listened to the commander in chief because he was voted by the people of the United States to have authority. If Jackson were a good citizen of his country he would have done what the country wanted.
Andrew Jackson never considered Native Americans as citizens, even when they indicated their rights. In Jackson’s message to Congress, he was misleading in saying that the Native Americans were leaving because of “persuasion” and that the “ . . . emigration should be voluntary”(Document 8). The Native Americans were forcibly moved from their homelands and traveled great distances to reach their new shared territory in Oklahoma. Jackson continued the removal of Natives favoring with the white people’s cry for more land to plant cotton. Jackson benefited by removing the Indians to please the common farmers making him more popular and well liked. Cherokee’s wished to stay on their homelands with “a perfect and original right to remain . . .” (Document 9). Native Americans wanted rights like white men, even some of them grew accustomed to Americans ways of civilization such as farming and owning slaves. Moving to the west would be an unknown territory to them that supplies little necessities like food and water. Each tribe did not want to decrease their population due to the lack of food and water, or even lose their sacred cultures and languages. Native Americans wished to stay...
This article talks about how Andrew Jackson fades away from the 20 dollar bill and about how he even ended up on money. It was the year 1928 Jackson’s face was selected to replace Grover Cleveland's. But it turns out nobody seems to know exactly why the Department of Treasury assigned Andrew Jackson face to the on the bill. Its intended audience is the people of the US and the people who love Andrew Jackson and hate Harriet Tubman or the people who love Harriet Tubman and hate Andrew Jackson or the people who love both of them. There's lots of bias in this paper, the writer (Gabe Bullard) says a lot of bad stuff about andrew jackson and says a lot of good stuff about Harriet Tubman. This paper connects to the idea of Manifest Destiny from what