Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of divorce in our society
Effect of divorce
Divorce and its effect
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of divorce in our society
A single decision can be the difference between life and death, joy and sadness, success and failure. Once a choice is made and executed, the result is a ripple effect so strong that even the maker of the decision cannot comprehend the magnitude of its impact. Divorce, the ending of a regretful marriage, is one such decision that impacted me. Waves of grief overtook my days and all I felt was rage. Uncontrolled, heated rage that turned my blood into fire, which I wanted to spit at my parents. Other times I felt numb and would soak my pillow in tears, dissipating my night into nothingness. However, I realized that if rather my focus turned to the better portion of history, and if there was a way to watch past days like a movie, I would witness a heart-warming production. It would definitely be easier to dwell on resentment against my parents because spite comes so easily in human nature. Without a second thought the blame is thrust onto the other person. In contrast, when a precious asset is lost, the prime focus should be on what good came out of it. Most people turn bitter, which might only increase the complication. …show more content…
Admittedly, forgetting is not an easy obstacle to overcome. All around there are signs of the departed which serve as a constant reminder of their betrayal. Even the mention of their name sounds like the tolling of an awfully solemn bell (Byron). A mind in such a situation is set on destruction, on the utter annihilation of every last trace of the unfaithful bastard. These remains are the cause of profound sorrow, so demolition becomes necessary. Their abandonment is an unsolved mystery. A mystery in the sense that it comes as a shock: life seemed to have been passing by peacefully. But now it was a storm of disbelief which makes one wonder “that thy heart could forget, thy spirit deceive” (Byron). The shock is greater when the cruel traitor was someone once treasured like a precious jewel by whom they left. An incessant sorrow remains in their wake, and a boundless stream of memories, which can become what is made of them. Choose to think of anguish and so it will be all one remembers, choose to think of joy and nothing but shall come to mind. Hemmings favored the latter and went back to his favorite haunts, recalling the cheery moments spent with his loved one. To forget is certainly a challenge, but forgiving turns the agony to pure delight. A change of perspective- a little more appreciation and a little less discontent- could assist a restless mind find peace with their lost love.
Hemmings, despite being isolated, looked at past moments, at pictures and memoirs that made having a lover worthwhile. It wouldn’t be easy to merely omit them from memory, or hope to wake up one morning with a blank mind. No, if the relationship was genuine there has to have been at least some part of it that was relished by all people involved. Dwell on those memories, remember those times when every moment seemed pleasant, those times which were spent laughing at trivial matters, those times when the worry of tomorrow was nonexistent, those times where one couldn’t live without the other. A resentful man just might put the past and his head to rest if instead of turning hostile, he forgave and let
go. Overtime, I have realized that the more hate I build up in my heart due to past events, the more my present bonds get hurt. I can’t afford to lose more family and friends to petty reasons. Divorce is certainly not a petty situation. However, its aftermath sure is. The union between my parents was not strong enough to last: this is a truth I accepted. When I think of the days of their unity, I call to mind the times when they laughed and celebrated with each other, when they cherished the connection they had. These thoughts encouraged me to forgive them and turned my hurt feelings into beautiful recollections.
Man must not only remember his past, but also choose to remember it as it really happened—for, to again quote Eliot, “What might have been is an abstraction" (175). Fantasizing about an abstract, idealized past will never give success i...
Harwood uses poetry to document her experiences and observations of marriage. She opens her life to the reader as she shares personal and intimate reflections on her choices in life. By this Harwood is able to re-create a vivid image of a life of a married lady during the 1940’s. Gwen Harwood was married during the year 1945 and moved with her husband, William Harwood, to Tasmania and away from her beloved childhood home in Brisbane. This change in Harwood’s life was a struggle as she did not completely agree to the move that will forever be thought of negatively. Harwood’s struggle of acceptance of her new life was evident in her poem “Iris”. In the poem Harwood looks at the positives and negatives of a marital relationship. Harwood uses the word ‘…singularity…’ to describe her relationship, this word makes the point that her and her husband have become one unit in which they walk through life and experience the good and the bad together. As well as having positive co...
One’s selfish actions can lead to the destruction of important relationships and regret for one’s past desires. During Richard’s younger years, he had always felt close to his family, speaking the same language, and sharing commonalities. As he grew older he distanced himself from his family because he wanted to feel like an outsider. Richard states, “Intimacy is not trapped within words. It passes through words. It passes. The truth is that intimates leave the room. Doors close. Faces move away from the window. Time passes. Voices recede into the dark. Death finally quiets the voice. And there is no way to deny it” (40). In this passage Richard states that ...
The past often contains many things that we desire, be it something as simple as a peaceful life to something strong such as a relationship with someone who has been lost. We all attempt to return to these feelings or times in many ways, from simple memories or tastes to ways as ridiculous and outlandish as Gatsby’s parties. Whether this feelings are ever truly experienced again or not varies from attempt to attempt, in the case of “The Great Gatsby” it was for only a brief moment before it was ripped from Gatsby with Tom’s
Point of view is an essential element to a reader's comprehension of a story. The point of view shows how the narrator thinks, speaks, and feels about any particular situation. In Toni Cade Bambara's "The Lesson," the events are told through the eyes of a young, mischievous girl named Sylvia who lives in a lower class neighborhood. The reader gets a limited point of view of view because the events are told strictly by Sylvia. This fact can influence the reader to see things just as she does. The strong language gives an unfamiliar reader an illustration of how people in the city speak. Bambara does this to show the reader that kids from lower class neighborhoods are affected by their environment due to lack of education and discipline, that how different one part of society is from another, and that kids learn from experience. We also get an insight of Sylvia’s feisty, rebellious nature and her lack of respect towards people with an education.
The first framework that would be beneficial when working with this population is the Dual Perspective Framework. The Dual Perspective Framework is a model that charges the social worker with assessing and understanding the client’s world. While doing so, one must take into account the client’s relationship to not only their immediate family and community, but also to the larger societal system while considering and comparing values, attitudes, and behaviors (Prigoff, 2003, p. 80). Another way to explain the Dual Perspective was presented by Dr. Nimmagadda as part of the diversity section of this course (2015). The contrasting views are also known as the “Nurturing Environment” versus the “Sustaining Environment.” The “Nurturing Environment” can be identified as the individual’s family or immediate extended family, while the “Sustaining Environment” can be identified as how an individual feels other’s view them in the social environment (Nimmagadda, 2015). An individual can evolve and change according to their experiences and interactions in both environments.
What they do not realize that it can affect them in so many ways but the one that will forever impact them the most is causing family problems. Which in many cases this leads them to lose the most important people in their lives. Not only that but they will regret everything at some point or think everything is fine but in reality it isn’t. For example in “Jerry and Molly and Sam” by Raymond Carver he mentions how Al (main character from his short story) was having an “affair” but “did not want it to go on, and he did not want to break it” (16). In addition Al was already having family problems plus he disliked the fact that the dog was part of their family but wants to get rid of the pet as soon as possible. Among that when he finally gets rid of the dog he regrets everything because he sees how upset his children are and his wife. He later informs to his wife that “Everything’s going to be alright…” (23). This proved that he regretted everything that came in-between his family and didn’t want to lose them. Speaking of not losing his family, in the short story “The Swimmer” by John Cheever is about a man name Neddy Merrill, who takes a last swim all the way to his home (which was about eight blocks from where he started) but to only find out that no one lives there anymore. Not only that but his family left him. In fact Cheever wrote in the
When you assert that “The Gentle Boy” by Nathaniel Hawthorne is a “heart-wrenching story that presents an eloquent, sympathetic portrait of Quakers as they confront Puritan persecution in Colonial New England,” you are summarizing the story in an inaccurate manner. Although it may be true that within the short story there exists a sectarian tension between the religions, Catharine, the Quaker, is not idealized as a victim and Dorothy, the Puritan, is not portrayed as a persecutor. In actuality, Catharine is a wild, overzealous, and unpredictable woman who neglects her responsibilities as a mother. Dorothy, whom you would typecast as a narrow-minded Puritan persecutor, is an ideal mother, a tender and kind human being who puts her instincts before what her religion may dictate. Hawthorne uses the distinction between Dorothy and Catharine to convey the true meaning of the story; extremism and excessive devotion to religion not only dilutes the mind but also warps natural core beliefs that a person should hold and adhere to. Hawthorne consistently critiques the importance that people place on religion and redefines the role it plays in our lives.
She would not have grieved over someone she did not love. Even in the heat of her passion, she thinks about her lost love. She knew that she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death; the face that had never looked safe with love upon her, fixed and gray and dead. Her love may not have been the greatest love of all time, but it was still love. Marriage was not kind to Mrs. Mallard, her life was dull and not worth living, her face showed the years of repression.
Hemmingway's somber tale is about conquering late night loneliness in a bright cafe. The customer drinking brandy suffers from it and so does the older waiter. However, the younger waiter cannot understand loneliness because he probably hasn't been very lonely in his life. He mentions a couple times throughout the story that he wished to be able to go home to his wife, yet the old man and old waiter have no wives to go home to like he does. This story have a deeper meaning to me because I often am in a similar situation at work.
I’ve never been one to hold grudges. As a kid, I could never commit to a grudge because it took too much will power. I didn’t like hating someone for too long because I always ended up thinking that I’d rather just be friends
The quotation from Doris Lessing really captures the essence of Honors 101 perfectly. The very notion that the semester may be summarized in this one quote— “This is what learning is. You suddenly understand something you’ve understood all your life, but in a new way.”— astounds me, as does the number of topics we have covered in such a brief period. In high school, we squandered an entire year to cover the topic of racism alone, yet we managed to cover that topic and numerous others in a shorter time while still acquiring a more deeply rooted, genuine understanding of the subjects. Each topic presented new ideas to the overall theme of self and society in ways that seemed completely nonsensical until the ideas were discussed in class. Even though many meaningful subjects were spoken of throughout the semester, three significant topics greatly developed my understanding of both the self and society, and now, looking back and recognizing the impact of each item allows me to appreciate the personal growth I have made that, without the context of this class, did not even seem possible.
For example, when my mother and my father were separated, this influence their behavior towards each other as well as my own behavior towards both parents. Despite the fact that I was still very young, I knew what was happening and this event certainly affected my life.
Have you ever been obsessed with money? In the story Seize the Day by Saul Bellow money basically runs everything. The main character, Tommy Wilhelm, invests his money with a friend of his father and loses everything. This story falls into the critical perspective of Economic Determinist and Marxism. The critical perspective of Economic Determinist and Marxist evaluates literature from the perspective of economic and social class inequality and oppression. This essay will explore how the story Seize the Day by Saul Bellow shows this critical perspective of Economic Determinist and Marxist.
Why is an integrative perspective, one that sees value in many models, including those listed above, the wise path to take when attempting to explain, treat, and prevent mental illness?