Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of bush 9/11 speech
Analysis of bush 9/11 speech
Address to the nation by george w. bush analyze a speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of bush 9/11 speech
Although tragedies are often quite sad and tragic, many can often lead to a better tomorrow with the right kind of leadership. For example, world leaders like former U.S. President George W. Bush and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair use their speech to motivate people into overcoming a tragedy and turning it into an opportunity to make the future greater and safer for posterity. After the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2011, it was absolutely necessary for Bush and Blair to use their speech to turn the world around and into a more positive direction. To accomplish this task, both Bush and Blair had to utilize tone and rhetorical strategies that would appeal to their audience. Generally, tone can be described as the attitude of …show more content…
a writer toward a subject or an audience. The tone of someone is capable of telling an audience whether they are sad, angry, or happy with something. The September 11th terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were some of the most devastating attacks in the history of the United States, and the level of devastation is truly shown in the tones of Bush’s and Blair’s speeches. In Bush’s speech to Congress on September 20, 2001, he says, “Great harm has been done to us. We have suffered great loss. And in our grief and anger we have found our mission and our moment. Freedom and fear are at war. The advance of human freedom, the great achievement of our time, and the great hope of every time, now depends on us. Our nation, this generation, will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future.” Since Bush is upset with the individuals that have caused terror, his tone can be considered to be bitter and angry. He also seems the be optimistic because he heavily believes that the American people have the power to win the war on terror. On the other hand, the tone of Blair’s speech to the Labour Party on October 2, 2001 is mostly sympathetic towards the American people. In his speech, Blair states, “I tell you: you do not feel like the most powerful person in the country at times like that. Because there is no answer. There is no justification for their pain.” The cruel acts of terrorism caused a deep sadness for British Prime Minister Blair, so he showed his sympathy for the American people through the tone of his speech. Both Bush’s and Blair’s tones were shaped to fit their audience, and this helped create a very effective speech for both individuals. When a writer or a speaker wants to create a powerful and effective argument, they use rhetorical devices in their works.
Some of the most common rhetorical strategies used include simile, metaphor, repetition, and allusion. In George W. Bush’s speech, he uses a rhetorical strategy when he says, “We will rally the world to this cause, by our efforts and by our courage. We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail.” The rhetorical strategy that Bush has used is known as an anaphora, a common type of repetition. The repetition of the phrase “we will” heightens the emotion of the speech, and it also adds a great amount of emphasis. On the other hand, Tony Blair also uses rhetorical strategies in his speech. For instance, Blair uses a rhetorical device when he says, “And as you crossed the room, you felt the longing and sadness; hands clutching photos of sons and daughters, wives and husbands; imploring you to believe them when they said there was still an outside chance of their loved ones being found alive, when you knew in truth that all hope was gone.” To have a better appeal to emotion, Blair softens his words when he says “all hope was gone” rather than saying that the victims of the terrorist attacks were ruthlessly killed. This rhetorical strategy is known as a euphemism. Both Bush and Blair employ rhetorical strategies throughout their speeches in order to accomplish their
goals. Most of the time, people view tragedies as simply a horrific event that can be never be healed. However, with good leadership, tragedies can often guide people into creating a better future for all of mankind. The September 11th terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were some of the most gruesome tragedies in the history of the United States, but two world leaders were able to turn this negative into a positive for the future. Both former U.S. President George W. Bush and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair would produce great and powerful speeches that would motivate people to change the world for the better. By using appropriate tone and rhetorical devices, Bush and Blair achieved their ultimate goals.
In “Terror’s Purse Strings”, Dana Thomas successfully persuades her target audience of general consumers to not purchase counterfeit products. Thomas’s purpose is to inform her audience that the notion of consuming counterfeit products being a victimless crime is completely false and the true harmful effects of consuming counterfeit products. In “Sweatshop Oppression”, Rajeev Ravisankar successfully persuades his target audience of general college students that they should take measures against corporations who knowingly use inhumane sweatshops to produce their products. Through the analysis of each writer's rhetorical strategies, the establishment of credibility, and stylistic techniques, I am going to compare and contrast Dana Thomas’s “Terror's
And to this day, these values hold up and serve as the basis for all aspects of our country, whether it range from politics to social issues. But on September 11, 2001, these fundamental principles that stand for freedom were put into serious jeopardy by maniacal terrorists who refused to accept the progressive role that America played on a global scale. But as America slowly began to recover from this tragedy, the responsibility to lift the American spirit was left to the hands of the politicians who we ironically know to cause so much chaos and bipartisan gridlock. Nonetheless, world leaders such as Rudy Giuliani eased the pain for the American populous in a manner that called for reform in order to prevent an attack like this from ever occurring on American soil. Ultimately, in his address to the United Nations General Assembly following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Rudy Giuliani makes effective use of tone, rhetorical devices, and logical and emotional appeals to soothe the wounds that the
On September 11, 2001, foreign terrorists hijacked and deliberately crashed commercial airplanes into the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington D.C. The attack and resulting loss of nearly 6000 lives have changed the way Americans view the world and life in their own country. This was mentioned to show how education is part of our ongoing culture, how schools have responded to crises in the past and how schools can promote democratic values and multicultural understanding in a time of crisis.
Bush opens his speech by acknowledging the events of September 11, and those that lost the lives of loved ones and to those that gave their life trying to save others in the buildings. He appeals to those that remain strong by saying that, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed. Our country is strong.” His use of pathos helps Bush to calm and control the public in order to keep the country together. This
President Bush and Prime Minister Blair delivered speeches shortly after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York and the Pentagon in Virginia, which occurred on September 11, 2001. The Former President George W Bush utilized pathos, anaphora, and personification in his speech to convey an optimistic tone. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, addressing the same topic, utilized mild invective and parallel structure to express an affirmative tone.
It all happened in an instant. One minute thousands of civilians were on their way to work when everything changed. President George Bush gave an iconic speech that was not only memorable but gave hope to the Americans that justice would be served to those associated with the terrorist group al-Qaida. George Bush’s speech rallied the Americans to fight back against the terrorists because he used rhetorical devices such as parallelism, analogies, and repetition.
In 1692, one of the most inhumane tragedies occurred in the small village of Salem, Massachusetts. Now infamously recognized as the “Salem Witch Trials,” the trials were based on faulty accusations that charged others of being witches. These accusations resulted in a considerable amount of people being imprisoned and hanged, and it ended with 20 people being killed. 309 years later, four planes were hijacked by terrorists and were set to crash in four important government centers and buildings. Consequently, these attacks resulted in 2,966 deaths and it was the most severe attack ever on American soil. The terrorists were revealed to be Muslims, and that they supposedly did it in the name of “Allah”, which is the Arabic translation for God.
Rhetorical devices can be seen being used in history, such as William Shakespeare’s dramatic play “Julius Caesar”. In Shakespeare’s play Brutus and Antony conspire to lead a group to assassinate Caesar. Rome is in a panic as they find out that their first emperor Octavian who went by the name Julius Caesar has been stabbed to death. Brutus and Antony in an effort to achieve Rome’s support use rhetorical devices to try to receive support for their actions. You can see how they use ethos, pathos, and logos to eventually achieve their goal of persuading the citizens of Rome.
These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” George Bush was president at the time when the 9/11 attack happened. George Bush wrote this quote for the thousands of lives that were hugely affected. To the kids worried about their parents while they are in school, to the worried husbands and wives, and brothers and sisters. The 9/11 attack did not only change the lives of people who lost a loved one, and the people who were there where the planes hit, but also people who just saw what was happening and people who heard about it, cried. The increase and patriotism and the rise in security will make people feel more secure and protected but it will never change the the amount of people affected by 9/11. Millions of people around the world know about what happened on September 11th, 2001. Millions of people will be changed
Members of Congress, leaders of other nations and their citizens, as well as any other al-Qaeda affiliates happening to be watching were also in the audience. This September 20, 2001, speech carried weight that defined a presidency and affected the course of a nation. It was a fiery call to arms and cry for vengeance of the American people, a warning for those perceived to be enemies or allies of enemies, and fueled by explosive pathos. The focus of this particular analysis will focus on five types of political rhetoric. Three types of propaganda: Bandwagon, Glittering Generalities, and Transfer as defined by a founder of The Institute for Propaganda Analysis and Columbia University professor Clyde Miller will appear. Rutgers University English professor and journal writer William Lutz’s definition of euphemism and its distinction as a type of doublespeak will appear. The purpose of this essay is to thoughtfully analyze a few prominent elements of Bush’s September 20, 2001, speech under elements of propaganda and doublespeak as identified by Clark and Miller and what some of their [Clark and Miller] criticisms of the speech might
9/11 was one of the darkest days in America, but some say the government could have been part of these attacks. For many years people have debated about the 9/11 cover up. This theory cannot explain why the government would do this. Once people understand why the 9/11 cover up is fake, they will begin to see the answer to their problem, could the government have done this? This conspiracy theory is wrong because, terrorists admitted to the attacks, so many people died, and there's no evidence against the government.
On September 11, 2001 John was on a senior field trip.The class went to the World Trade Center. They went to the North Tower. John had a good time. John found it fascinating what they do there.Ten all of the sudden out of nowhere there was a big boom.
In Mr. President’s speech, he uses all 3 rhetorical devices. Most prominently, however, was his use
In his speech, delivered on September 11th, 2001, President George W. Bush attempted to address the country on the heart-wrenching incident that had just occurred only a few hours earlier. On this day, the people of America witnessed terrorist attacks to three of our nation's most recognized establishments. President Bush gave his utmost effort in providing the citizens of America with a sense of comfort when they needed it most. Using an optimistic tone, Bush explained to citizens that together they will refer back to the promising outcomes of past traumatic events and experiences and use this form of hope to keep the people of America hopeful for troubling times to come. With a new sense of unity, the people of America were looking for answers
In his speech, delivered on September 11th, 2001, President George W. Bush attempted to address the country on the heart-wrenching incident that had just occurred only a few hours earlier. On this day, the people of America witnessed terrorist attacks to three of our nation's most recognized establishments. President Bush gave his utmost effort in providing the citizens of America with a sense of comfort when they needed it most. Using an optimistic tone, Bush explained to citizens that together they will refer back to the promising outcomes of past traumatic events and experiences and use this sense of hope to keep the people of America hopeful for troubling times to come. With a new sense of unity, the people of America were looking for answers