The Original Rules of Basketball In the documentary, “30 for 30: There’s No Place Like Home”, there is a very debatable subject. The documentary was created by Josh Swade who is an intense KU fan. He had a quest to obtain James Naismith’s original rules of basketball and bring them back to Kansas University. In the end, he completed his mission. This was the disputable topic that while many people thought it was unworthy, others thought it was honorable. Nevertheless, this historic document does not belong at KU for many reasons. Furthermore, without Josh Swade’s help and persistent personality, this document would not be at KU. The negatives undoubtedly outweigh the positives in having this document at Kansas University. One reason it doesn’t belong at KU is because it was insanely expensive, and KU itself didn’t even feel a need for it. Duke, on the other hand, had more financial support for the rules. Although, some Kansas alumni have lots of money to pay for the rules, they shouldn’t waste millions of dollars on a document. Not to mention, they weren’t even thinking about trying to obtain the document until Josh Swade attempted to persuade them. Josh didn’t even pay any money himself. The price of the document was expensive, but Josh still had to pay for his gas and airplane flights to try to convince each donor to provide money for the …show more content…
document. He also spent money on t-shirts, which he forced into the donor's hands to try to get them to contribute to the cause. The document may be important to KU and it’s history, but it is not something that KU needs. With the money paid for the document, they could have paid for something more recognizable, such as improving the facilities. In addition to this, Josh was hesitant to flat out tell them that he wanted money. So, he didn’t tell them the entire truth and just said they were getting an interview. He was, as a matter of fact interviewing them, but his main goal was to coax them to donate money. If the donors really cared enough to donate hundreds and millions of dollars, why wouldn’t they have done so if he flat out asked? Well, they may have not wanted to meet with him or discuss cash. This is, indeed, a smart strategy to get donations. On the other hand, it is somewhat disrespecting the owner's privacy. Swade would constantly keep pleading for money, until he got it. All the effort that was put through to get the money was highly unnecessary. Besides, the document was pricey and expensive anyway. Another reason the document doesn’t belong at KU is because James Naismith started basketball in Springfield, Massachusetts around 1891. He also has a memorial in Massachusetts already, so there would already be a spot to put them. Kansas would then not have to pay the expenses for the document either. The sport came to be in Massachusetts when Naismith nailed peach baskets to the walls, at the place that is now Springfield College. Not only this, but the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame is located in Springfield as well. On the contrary, basketball grew up in Kansas and Naismith was even buried in Lawrence after his death. But, why not have the rules at the place where it all began? Springfield would have been a perfect spot for them to stay. There are many theories on if these rules are even the originals. Could anyone imagine spending around 4 million dollars for some rules that weren’t even the originals? If anyone was going to take this risk, Springfield should have because they have a phenomenal basketball museum to place them in. Certainly, these rules were important. But at the same auction, a copy of the Emancipation Proclamation, signed by President Abraham Lincoln and purchased by Robert F. Kennedy, was sold. In the end, it sold for 3.7 million dollars, while the rules sold for 4.3 million dollars. So, what if these rules weren’t the originals? Would the donors still have paid 4.3 million dollars for another copy? Surely not. If the rules weren’t the originals, Swade probably wouldn’t have thought to attempt to get the rules. If the documents aren’t the originals, then there is no reason to spend so much time and money on trying to obtain them. All in all, this document does not belong at KU.
The expenses, other places the document could be, and the fact that the rules may not be the originals, makes people wonder why Swade wanted these so bad. The rules don’t belong and, then again, the negatives overpower the positives. David Booth was one of the most impactful donors. Booth, when talking about the rules, said,“There were some funny ones. [...] The whole thing seems kind of funny.” Thus, Booth donated millions of dollars to a situation he wasn’t even sure about, he simply thought that situation was funny. In the end, the rules so not belong at Kansas
University.
In basketball, the National Championship game is the dream of every kid that plays basketball in college. NC State’s basketball team wasn’t well known in 1983. Jim Valvano was the coach and he knew he had a great group of kids. When they won the ACC tournament against the great Ralph Sampson and Virginia, people thought that the win was just luck and they probably wouldn’t make last when they got into the tournament. Throughout the tournament, NC State kept surviving and advancing. In Johnathan Hock’s documentary “Survive and Advance”, Hock uses stock footage of the games that were played during the tournament, different points of view from the players, and the sequence of the documentary to prove that NC State’s basketball team were the underdogs during the whole tournament; however they were able to win despite their adversity
Bakke disagreed with the court on this issue and he brought it before the California Supreme Court.The California Supreme Court held that it was the University's burden to prove that Bakke would not have been admitted if the special program was not in effect. The school could not meet this requirement, and Bakke was admitted by court orde r. However, the University appealed to the Supreme Court for "certiorari", which was granted, and the order to admit Bakke was suspended pending thCourt's decision.3 The Issues and Arguments for Each Side"Bakke was the most significant civil rights case to reach the United States Supreme Court since Brown v. Board the Education of Topeka, Kansas."4 The special admissions program at Davis tried to further integrate the higher education system because merely removing the barriers, as the Brown case did, did not always work. In short, Bakke was questioning how far the Universi...
After reports of several transgressions and the surface of a damaging videotape which appeared to show Knight physically assaulting a former player, the president of Indiana, Neil Reed, had explained to Knight that there was a zero tolerance policy where Knight was concerned (Wolff, 2000). Despite the repeated warnings and the newly stated zero tolerance policy, Knight continued to commit transgressions that eventually got him fired from Indiana University where he had coached for almost three decades. Indiana University took a thrashing from Knight fans’ over this decision, but keeping Knight as an agent of the University could have resulted in a legal disaster. From a Biblical worldview, the University showed mercy in the second chances that it provided to Knight. In addition, their actions did not appear to be malicious when they made the decision to let him go.
Some schools generate thousands and thousands of dollars from sports teams, that end up having to be removed so it can follow Title IX guidelines. It creates an illusory sense to people that have not been affected by it. Everyone should be informed of this inane law, and should be standing against it. Title IX has ended many moneymaking men's sports teams, has ruined any chance of some men's athletes to be offered a scholarship, and has made the NCAA and the school's waste money. Title IX may go down as one of the worst impacts on men's collegiate
Defending Titles Diversely: A Persuasive Essay about the Lack of Diversity in Sports Many Americans have seen or at least heard of the movie “Remember the Titans.” The classic film focuses on a school that blends black and whites and takes on an African American head coach. The coach knows the importance of winning, but also knows the team must work together to get those wins and have respect for every single person in the locker room. Although coach Boone was still put in a tough situation with the school board and the community, he was able to lead his team, with the help of a white assistant coach, to an undefeated season. The team coming together is exactly what America does with sports.
In the collegiate world of sports, basketball has become an increasingly recognized sport among African Americans, predominantly males. The hope of any young basketball player is that one day a scout will come and recruit them into stardom The question that presents itself as a problem to the lucky few who are chosen to go professional, is whether or not an education is more important than a million dollar shoe deal, “The NCAA's (1998) annual six-year study reported that only 33% of Black male basketball players graduated, (Chronicle of Higher Education, 1999). Individually, basketball reported the lowest graduation rate in all divisions,” (Robinson, 2004:1). Basketball players have become so idolized in the eyes of young Black male basketball athletes, that the value of education appear to be less important in the development of these young men, “According to Sailes (1997), there is an over-representation of Black males in particular sports and an under-representation in other segments of American society. He provides the example of percentages of Black males competing in the NBA (77%), NFL (65%), MLB (15%), and MLS (16%) in comparison to the fact that fewer than 2% of doctors, lawyers, architects, college professors, or business executives are Black males.”, (Robinson, 2004:1). The idea of the attainment of a professional basketball player’s salary in the NBA, without even having to go to school for the time it takes to earn a degree is very appealing to some players. Those with a wealthy, or even upper-middle class upbringing may not view material assets as a priority. In the Black community, we have theorized that money and success play a more important role than education in most households. Although these two seem to go together, one resulting from the other, this does not apply in the sports world. Our research will examine the role that the family value system plays in influencing Black vs. White male athletes to turn professional, as opposed to obtaining a college degree before turning professional.
Wiggins, David Kenneth, and Patrick B. Miller. 2003. The unlevel playing field: a documentary history of the African American experience in sport. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
...hedules the athletes had, they are still considered just a student. The NCAA cannot continue to allow these schools to work the athletes as much as they do without giving the athletes what they deserve.
In 1948 the NCAA passed new legislation called the Sanity Code which allowed for institutions to pay for the tuition of “exceptional” athletes as long as they could qualify academically. The Sanity Code would last about ten yeas then it would be replaced by a new financial aid package that is very similar to the one used today. This package allows for a school to pay for an athlete’s tuition, room and board and other fee’s like books etc in return for the athlete’s services. To many critics this was seen as th...
The New York Times. (28th August 2003). College Basketball; Death and Deception. [Retrieved 22/01/2014]. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/28/sports/college-basketball-death-and-deception.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
The following words lie at the heart of what is perhaps the most controversial and most important rules in all college athletics- Title IX states, "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance," was signed into law as part of the Education Amendments of 1972. Since most schools and universities receive some financial assistance through title or chapter funds, research grants, or Pell grant financial aid programs, they must comply with the mandates of the law. After more than 25 years, one would assume that all educational institutions would have had sufficient time to address inequities of opportunity and treatment within their athletic programs. However, with an estimated 93% of colleges still out of compliance in at least one of the three components mandated by the law, it is obvious that there remains a long road ahead before equity is achieved. So what exactly are these components (W.I.N.N., 66).
On May 20, 1974, Senator Tower proposed an amendment to Title IX which would allow revenue-producing sports to be exempt from being tabulated when determining a school's Title IX compliance. This proposal was rejected. [1] Two months later, Senator Javits proposed an amendment which would require the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) to issue the Title IX regulation including the phrase "with respect to intercollegiate athletic activities, reasonable activities considering the nature of particular sports." This amendment was adopted. [1] The following June, Representative O'Hara introduced House Bill H.R. 8394, proposing to use the revenue-producing sports money to first support that sport, then to help support the other sports. This bill died in committee, as did a July, 1977 proposal by Senators Tower, Bartlett and Hruska to exclude revenue-producing sports from Title IX coverage. [1] In 1975, HEW issued the final Title IX regulation (34 C.F.R. Part 106), which was signed int...
...was acceptable. According to TITLE IX: Creating Unequal Quality Through Application of the Proportionality Standard in Collegiate Athletics, ” Congress had the power to remedy past discrimination, thus men cannot claim a Title IX violation for lack of full and effective accommodation if the proportionality requirement is still in their favor. Therefore, the Kelley court ruled that the men's team did not have a valid cause of action under Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause” (Ambrosius 577).This example shows that Title IX is willing to sacrifice men’s sports for women’s sports. Title IX can’t continue to argue that they want equality and not show that they truly want equality. They’ve worked on gaining equality for women, but they can’t take away the men’s equality in the process of that. It can’t be lopsided, both men’s and women’s sports have to be balanced.
...” says Myles Brand the president of the NCAA. (USAtoday.com) The program continually complains that providing players unsanctioned funds spoils fair competition between teams, because some players will only want to go to schools with a reputation for providing players extras such as money, cars etc.
When people play basketball, they usually don’t think about the history. They don’t think who created it, who leads in assists, steals, blocks, points, and rebounds in the entire history of the sport. Did they know that it was illegal to dunk just because of one person, and he soon became the all-time scoring leader? Who created the name “slam dunk”? When was the first basketball game ever played? Who was on the first basketball team, and how many players were on a team?