Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short critical analysis of trifles
Short critical analysis of trifles
Short critical analysis of trifles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short critical analysis of trifles
The play “Trifles” written by Susan Glaspell a mysterious murder story that took place in the early 1900’s focusing on the psychology of the opposite sex and comparing the two. In the play, Mrs. Minnie Wright, was convicted for the murder of her husband, Mr. John Wright, although there was no physical evidence she was to blame. As a juror in this court I believe Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale should be held accountable for their lack of judgement which caused them to withheld evidence that link directly at Mrs. Wright making her guilty for murdering her husband. Although, it is quite clear Mrs. Wright was mentally unstable which lead her to kill her husband; and leaving Mrs. Wright without the proper mental care she should have received if all the evidence would have been submitted.
In the beginning of the story Lewis Hale explains Mrs. Wright “was
…show more content…
rocking back and forth” when he entered the house to check on Mr. Wright as though her brain was trying to cope with the murder she committed. It was clear at that moment something was not right with her because she of her calm and soothing voice of confusion. Even Hale noticed when “she didn’t ask” him to “come up to the stove or to sit down” which was obvious it was something Hale was accustom to when entering some else’s home. She “laughed” when Hale asked to see Mr. Wright; a person who just lost their spouse is more than likely not start laughing at the thought of them. Mrs. Wright was just sitting in the corner of her house, staring at who know what, playing with her apron, instead of looking for someone to help her save her husband or in this case where it was too late, to catch the murder. When Hale finished telling his story Mr. Henderson asked if there was anything that suggested a “motive” to be found the room, Sheriff Peter said “nothing but kitchen things”. Who else knows better the kitchen then another woman? It could not be any clearer that Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale being left alone could spot things that the men obviously could not. Mrs. Peters found Mrs. Wrights quilt project and when Mrs. Hale observed the pieces she asked whether “she was going to quilt it or knot it” which alarmed Mrs. Hale to question “what was she so nervous about”. Evidently, Mrs. Wright’s ability to tie a perfect knot was proven when the women found the knotted quilt continuing to prove she is capable of the knotting the rope around her deceased husband. Again, that was only something a woman could have noticed because the men only laughed when Mrs. Hale brought this small detail to their attention. Mrs. Hale mentioned “this was a quiet house” making it quite lonely for an individual to spend their entire day locked up in house doing the same thing every day could drive someone mad. Visiting Mrs. Wright could have been the extra encouragement she needed to keep going; that is something Mrs. Hale now could “see” as she put the evidence together in her head. Mrs.
Hale found it quite odd about the Wright’s having an animal as beautiful as a bird living there specially when it was always so dark and gloomy in their home. Digging though Mrs. Wright’s sewing basket they found a beautiful red box that contained the “bird” from the missing cage with a “wrung neck”. Seconds after discovery of the dead bird the gentlemen return to the living room asking the women about the empty bird cage they had discovered; both, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, decided to hide their knowledge of the dead bird in the beautiful red box. Mrs. Hale identified the missing link of Mrs. Wright’s motive to murder her husband by stating “Wright, wouldn’t like the bird – a thing that sang. She use to sing. He killed that, too.”. Mr. Wright had obviously oppressed his wife specially during those times when women did not have the right to vote and, much less, to voice their opinions even in the comfort of their own home. Figuratively speaking Mrs. Wright’s beautiful voice was oppressed while the bird was literally killed by non-other than Mr. Wright; which leads us to the psychological snap Mrs. Wright
experienced. Mrs. Wright saw herself as the bird in the cage, spent all the time in a cage never allowed to fly about freely. Witnessing her husband kill the innocent creature, who she resembled herself with was the breaking point she needed to free herself from the incarceration her husband lead her to live. The two women present at the scene of the crime could quickly put the puzzle pieces together at Mrs. Wright, who was not in the proper state of mind that lead her to make such an impulsive move on her husband. Yet, they hid the evidence from the court which could potentially have linked Mrs. Wright to the murder of her husband and dismissing her possibilities to receive the proper mental care she needed. Understanding the importance of psychology and how a person could snap from being completely normal to making irrational decisions to help them cope with what they are currently experiencing in life.
I. Article Summary: Suzy Clarkson Holstein's article, “Silent Justice in a Different Key: Glaspell's 'Trifles'” evaluates the play Trifles and how the difference between the men in the play mirror how a woman's perspective is very different from a man's. Trifles is about two women, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, who show up at a house with their husbands and the county attorney to investigate a murder. The entire time the men are looking for evidence to implicate the accused wife, Minnie Wright, of killing her husband. Meanwhile, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale are there to gather up some items to bring Minnie Wright in jail. While doing so, the women uncover evidence that would prove the wife is culpable but decide to hide it from the men in the last moments of the play. Trifles is evaluated on how the women are able to come up with the evidence unlike the men because they didn't approach it like a crime scene but rather a home, “By contrast, the women arrive at a home. Although neither they or the men realize it, they too are conducting an investigation” (Holstein 283). Holstein also notes they are able to find evidence because they use their own life experiences to relate to the accused murderer, Minnie Wright as shown here; “But the women do not simply remember and sympathize with Minnie. They identify with her, quite literally” (285). Holstein finishes the article by noting the women decide to hide the evidence because of the solidarity they feel towards Minnie Wright; “From Mrs. Hale's perspective, people are linked together through fragile, sometimes imperceptible strands. The tiny trifles of life –a neighbor's visit, a bird's song, the sewing of a quilt –have profound reverberations” (287).
Trifles” is a play written in 1916 by Susan Glaspell. The play’s audience consists of young adults to those in their late 50’s. Mrs. Glaspell takes a serious matter of domestic violence and uses her platform as an author to raise awareness about the issue. In the play “Trifles” a neighbor went to the home of Mr. and Mrs. Wright only to find Mr. Wright dead in his bed. He had been strangled to death by a rope. The neighbor questioned Mrs. Wright about the matter and her response was odd and suspicious. Mrs. Wright was taken to jail while the home is being investigated for further evidence. Mrs. Glaspell’s play “Trifles” effectively achieves the goal in raising awareness on domestic violence by the evidence of the crime and through pathos.
Mrs. Wright, however, justified killing her husband due to Mr. Wright trapping her inside the house and how Mrs. Wright job is only to be domestic wife. When Mrs. Hale (farmer’s wife) and Mrs. Peters (sheriff’s wife) discovered a dead bird with her neck bruised all over, they start to put the pieces to the puzzle together and ...
The females begin responding “stiffly” rather than “quietly”(7) as before. This adjective usage serves to support the speech even more by allowing readers to see the progression from silence to a bold rebellion in the women regarding their husbands, for “by hiding the canary Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters are also going against their husbands” (Bee2). Indeed, this act was the major act of defiance that secured the women’s strengthened devotions to each other rather than their husbands. Peters especially undergoes a drastic transformation when she eventually joins in as “support of her fellow oppressed women” (Block B 1). When, at the climax of the story, the bird is hidden from the men in the sentimental tin box, Glaspell exhibits the tension with the selection of detail. She chooses to focus on the clammy hands of Mrs. Peters as she stuffs the tin away and the quivering voice of Mrs. Hale as she denies knowing any information about the crime. The descriptions of the seemingly miniscule and weakening objects around her house match the “quiet desperation” (Schotland 3) Foster repressed until it overflowed the night before. Considering that the adjectives show how burdensome it is for the women to conceal the evidence, it truly demonstrates how strong the relationships between them has grown based
Mr. Hale describes Mrs. Foster as being “queer” or strange. It is know that people in highly stressful situations can behave in a manner that is considered inappropriate such as laughing at a funeral and perhaps Minnie Foster is in such a situation that mental she is struggling to believe what has happened. She may also be in a state of shock causing peculiar behavior and a lack of judgement. Furthermore, the possible motive that Minnie Foster killed her husband over him killing her bird is weak. Mrs. Hale remembers Mrs. Foster as being a normal girl who people adored and yet how could such a normal person commit murder over the death of a bird. Perhaps the bird had died and she simply had not had time to bury the bird. Minnie Foster’s behavior suggest she was in shock over the death of her husband causing her to act strange not because she killed her husband and further the weakness of the suggested motive that she killed Mr. Foster because he killed her bird jumps to a conclusion without clear
In the play Trifles, written by Susan Glaspell, a small number of people are at the Wright house trying to figure out why and how Mr. Wright was murdered. Mrs. Wright is already the suspect, and all that is needed for the case is evidence for a motive. The jury needs something to show anger or sudden feeling so that they can convict her for murder. The men, Mr. Henderson, Mr. Peters, and Mr. Hale are there to find the evidence. The women, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, are there to pick up a select few items for Mrs. Wright. While the men are going about business and looking for evidence to build a case against Mrs. Wright, the women are looking over what Mrs. Wright left behind and intuitively trying to understand what happened. They are also trying to fathom why Mrs. Wright would be compelled to perform such an act of violence. As the story goes on, it constructs each of the characters in slightly different means. Susan Glaspell presents Mr. Wright and Mrs. Hale as having contrasting and comparable characteristics. While Mrs. Hale and Mr. Wright differ in terms of emotions, they are similar in their cleanliness and are well respected by others.
Susan Glaspell’s most memorable one-act play, Trifles (1916) was based on murder trial case that happened in the 1900’s. Glaspell worked as a reporter, where she appointed a report of a murder case. It was about a farmer, John Hossack who was killed while he was asleep in bed one night. His wife claimed that she was asleep next to him when the attack occurred. No one believed in her statement, she was arrested and was charged on first degree murder.
In the play Trifles, Susan Glaspell brings together three women through a crime investigation in the late nineteenth century. Glaspell uses symbolism, contrast of sexes, and well-constructed characters to show that justice for all is equally important to finding the truth. Perhaps the most prevalent literary device in the Trifles is the rich symbolism. Each of the women in the play are equally important, but come together to become more powerful. Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters directly bond, while Mrs. Wright indirectly contributes from jail by leaving them small clues.
Hale and Mrs. Peters are quick to aid the defense of Mrs. Wright. Specifically, when the County Attorney is talking about how badly she keeps her home. “Dirty towels! Not much of a housekeeper, would you say, ladies,” in which Mrs. Hale retourts “There's a great deal of work to be done on a farm.” Later on when the men are off looking for evidence, that is when the ladies discover the bird with the ringed neck. Glaspell (1916) writes “But, Mrs. Peters — look at it! It's neck! Look at its neck! It's all — other side to. Somebody — wrung — its — neck.” The ladies then discuss who they think may have done it. Mrs. Hale is quick to blame Mr. Wright, identifying him as the the person who wrung the birds neck: “No, Wright wouldn't like the bird — a thing that sang. She used to sing. He killed that, too,” and when Mrs. Peters says they do not know who killed the bird, Mrs. Hale replies “I knew John Wright.” In the end the county Attorney asks them what they collected for her, and they end up hiding the bird from the Sheriff and attorney. They most likely realized that the bird would provide a motive into the killing of John, something they desperately need if they will convict
The birdcage represents how Mrs. Wright was trapped in her marriage, and could not escape it. The birdcage door is broken which represents her broken marriage to Mr. Wright. It also represents Mrs. Wright escaping her marriage from Mr. Wright. When the door is open it allows Mrs. Wright to became a free woman. At one point in time the cage door use to have a lock that locked the bird inside the cage. This represents how Mr. Wright kept Mrs. Wright locked up from society. Mr. Wright knew that by keeping Mrs. Wright locked up, she would never be able to tell anyone how he really acted. Mr. Wright was very cruel to his wife.
The play Trifles and the short story “A Jury of Her Peers” were written by Susan Glaspell. Glaspell was a feminist writer who used her writing talent to illustrate the widespread inequality between the men and women of the time. She wrote the play in 1916 and a year later adapted it into the short story “A Jury of Her Peers”. Glaspell’s inspiration for these pieces was an actual event in which a woman murdered her husband that she had covered when she was a reporter. The themes Susan Glaspell is most concerned with are female oppression, patriarchal dominance, and revenge. At that time in history, society was very much patriarchal. It was a time when women were expected to be quiet and obey and trust their husbands completely. The play and
In 1916, Susan Glaspell wrote the play Trifles. The following year, she wrote it as the short-story “A Jury of Her Peers.” The story and play are about a woman who is charged with her husband’s murder and a group of people including neighbors, the town sheriff, and the county attorney. Although Trifles was changed from a play to a story, it and “A Jury of Her Peers” can be compared and contrasted in many ways including the details, the formatting, and the text itself.
The two females noticed everything around and questioned everything. The find a bird cage and wondered if she owned a bird and it not, what was the bird cage for. Ms. Peters and Mrs. Hale find the bird and notice that the neck had been twisted. Mrs. Hale states how all the women live close together but feel far apart, they all go through the same thing. George Henderson, The County Attorney says that all these things the woman found and were about to take, weren’t relevant to the crime scene because they were things that weren’t dangerous, in other words I believe that he said these things were unrelated to anything that happened that night, because they were things that belonged to a women or mainly because there were small things that during the 20th century wouldn’t hurt a man or a man wouldn’t let himself be taken down, by something so irrelevant. At the end of the story the women conclude that Mr. Wright, killed Mr. Wright the same way he had killed her bird. Mrs. Hale and Ms. Peter decide to hide what they had uncovered about the event that took place that night Mr. Wright was killed. In my opinion the reason they decided to hide all this information was because like they said Mrs. Wright was very happy and her husband was very
“Trifles was based on true events. In 1900, a man named John Hossack was murdered with an ax while he slept. His wife, Margaret claims to have slept through the murder. The Jury did not believe her story and found her guilty of murder. Susan Glaspell, who was a journalist with Des Moines Daily News, covered the trial for her newspaper. Even though she did not have any criminal justice background, Glaspell acted like a true detective. She investigated the murder by visiting the farmhouse where Hossack and his wife Margaret lived. She also interviewed attorneys and studied testimonies. Glaspell became very impressed with the st...
Wright was described as a beautiful women filled with such joy and life until she married John Wright. Mrs. Peter’s and Mrs. Hale feels sorry for her because her husband treated her so bad. Due to female bonding and sympathy, the two women, becoming detectives, finds the truth and hides it from the men. The play shows you that emotions can play a part in your judgement. Mrs. Peter’s and Mrs. Hale felt sorry that Mrs. Wright had one to keep her company no kids and she was always left alone at home. “yes good; he didn’t drink, and kept his word as well as most, I guess, and paid his debt. But he was a hard man, Mrs. Peters just to pass the time of day with him. Like a raw wind that goes to the bone. I should of think she would have wanted a bird. But what you suppose went with it?” Later on in the play the women find out what happens to the bird. The bird was killed the same way Mrs. Wright husband which leads to the motive of why he was killed. Mrs. Wright was just like the bird beautiful but caged no freedom not being able to live a life of her own. Always stuck in the shadows of her husband being told what to do and