Synopsis: On 11-28-2015 at 1030 hrs. An Assault with a Deadly weapon occurred at 133 Industrial Way, San Jose/ Brother’s Inn (Men’s homeless shelter). Two clients (V- Rush and S-Lowe) get into a verbal argument in the day room of shelter. V-Rush borrowed $20 from the S-Lowe last month and paid him back last week, but today again suspect confront V-Rush to pay his money back, because of this they got into an argument. S-Lowe was drunk, so he starts hitting V-Rush on his face with both fists and he hit back. S-Lowe also took out a razor from his right side jacket pocket and swung it back and forth at V-Rush face and scream “I’m gonna cut you real good”. V-Rush backed up to save himself but he fell over into his back on the floor. S-Lowe stood …show more content…
over him and cut his face several times with the razor. While S-Lowe cutting V-Rush, he heard manager yelling to stop the fight and people running down the hall. So then he stated “I’ll back and finish you off later”, and run to the down hall to the front door. Victim got minor injuries. Suspect was booked into the county jail on counts of Assault with a Deadly weapon. Narrative: On 11-28-2015 at 1030 hrs.
I was dispatched by communication to a reported Assault with a Deadly Weapon at 133 Industrial Way, San Jose/ Brother’s Inn (Men’s homeless shelter). I arrived at the shelter 1035 hrs. While I reached to the location, I saw a victim man, who is very badly injured on his face, and two other mans (Manager and client) in the Day Room of shelter. I also observed all the furniture in the day room was all turned over. I also advised communication to response a fire/ambulance for treatment of victim. I went to the victim ask for is identification and statement about the happened. After taking V-Rush statement, transported him to the county hospital by fire/ambulance EJ7 for health treatment. Then, I start getting more information about the incident from Witness’s. First, I contract with the shelter Manager and obtained his identification and statement regarding the incident. Second, I went to Client and obtained his identification and statement regarding to what happened. Both (Manager and client) were separated at the time of the interview. After the interview, I advise the communication to look for suspect at St. James park (1st St. & St.) and for his record check. I took 2 photos of the victim full body and 3 photos of injuries by point them. I also took 4 photos of the day room of shelter. All this photos was booked into the county jail later as police …show more content…
evidence. After done everything here in shelter, I went to St.
James Park to responded communication advised and to take suspect in custody. While, I reached to the park, I saw S-Lowe sit alone in the garden area I went close to him and advised him that he is under arrest for Assault with a Deadly Weapon by showing him the warrant against him. I request S-Lowe identification and after giving name and age he refused to talk. Then I advised him his Miranda right and he gave statement. I conducted a search of suspect (Lowe) for a weapon and I found a razor in his right side of jacket pocket, which has fresh blood on it. I took razor from suspect and also took 2 photos of it and booked photos and physical razor in evidences. Then at 1045 hrs. I secured his arm behind his back with handcuff and check it to make sure it is not so tight or loss and I placed him in the back seat of my car and transported to the jail. Where I took 4 photos of suspect and I advise county nurse to do blood test and alcohol test of suspect reports of tests later booked in evidence with the suspect 4
photos.
A forty-six-year-old man named Lawrence M. Bradford had filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Syracuse, New York. Bradford claimed that police officers Chad D. Frederick and Shane M. Ryan entered his residence without a warrant, although his roommate Shara Bixby, let the officers into the house. Mr. Bradford said that the officers forced Shara Bixby into letting them into the residence after she had told police that he was not home. The two officers were there to arrest Mr. Bradford for his part in the assault of another man. Bradford pleaded guilty in Jefferson County Court in August 2013 to second-degree assault. Mr. Bradford and another man was accused of stealing money and property from Jeffrey Jewett in Watertown, New York, while striking him on the head and body, causing a cut above the victim’s
The case of the State of Florida vs. Chad Heins happened in 1994 in Mayport, Florida. It was on April 17, 1994 that Tina Heins, who was pregnant at the time, was found stabbed to death in her apartment. She shared an apartment with her husband Jeremy Heins and Jeremy’s brother Chad Heins. At the time of the incident Jeremy Heins was on a ship because he worked in the navy but Chad Heins was at the apartment. Before the incident happened Chad Heins, the defendant, who was nineteen at the time, used his brothers license to buy alcohol at a strip club near the apartment. After that Chad Heins had went to another bar where his brothers license got confiscated. He left the bar around 12:45 a.m. and went back to the apartment. He then washed his
On 01-01-17 at 0023 hours I was monitoring the radio and heard that Officer Harrell #3441 and Officer Thebeau #8402 were involved in a vehicle pursuit in the area of Fair Oaks Avenue and Corson Street. I responded to the above location to assist. They advised responding units that the suspect was involved in a traffic collision on the eastbound 210 Freeway Fair Oaks Avenue off-ramp.
Happening in today’s society, there have been countless number of citizens being killed by law enforcement. Some situations may not cause for force and others may. This case can be a reference in regards to making sure that the force you use is appropriate for the situation. As for the justice system, it is all about being fair and listening to both sides and issuing out the right punishment if there is any. Many people in today’s time needs to get educated when it comes to the reason behind why law enforcement uses force to handle the situations they have to deal with. But in the end it all comes down to right and
Victim Avina told me approximately five years, prior to getting married, Suspect Avina threw his dress shoe at her. The shoe hit Vicitm Avina is the stomach which did not cause any injuries. About two months ago, Suspect Avina attempted to push Victim Avina’s right shoulder. Victim Avina lend back and avoided the push but hit her right upper thigh against the living rooms coffee table. The impact later left a quarter size bruise. Victim Avina took a photograph of the bruise (see attached photo).
I arrived on scene at 17:10 hours. A juvenile was standing under the carport beside a white Dodge Durango. The reporting party, Kaella D. Barners (F/B, DOB: 05/04/1977), exited the front door when she seen deputies arrive. I approached the juvenile, Katera Edwina Barners (F/B, DOB: 08/29/2000). Katera was calm and cooperative. Katera had been upset at her mother. I observed an end table on the hood of the vehicle. I asked Katera if she put it there. Katera said she threw it there in attempt to damage the vehicle.
When officer Faultless seized the phones of Rahten and Ruhmoan both were secured then secured by officer faultless. Officer faultless unable to unlock the phones noticing Ruhmoan’s phone required his thumb print to open and forcefully used his thumb to unlock his phone. Once unlocked the officer noticed information from a text about a gun being in their car. This lead to the officer searching the car and discovering a gun. The gun was located in the passenger’s driver’s seat well out of the view of both
I wanted to look at the investigative and criminal procedures following the arrest of an alleged criminal and the powerful effects via testimonies and evidence (or lack thereof) it can have on a case.There is an importance of the courts in regards to crime that can’t be over looked. The primary function of the criminal justice system is to uphold the established laws, which define what we understand as deviant in this society.
David Riley was pulled over on August 22, 2009 for driving with expired tags. Riley’s license was suspended and therefore, the car had to be impounded. Upon impounding the car it was searched, and its contents cataloged. When searching the car, police found two guns and added the charge of carrying a firearm to Riley’s offence. Riley also had his cell phone. The gang unit detective searched his phone and found evidence connecting Riley to gang activity. They also found evidence connecting Riley to a recent shooting of a car that belonged to a member of a different gang. Evidence on his phone, along with ballistic tests, indicated that Riley was involved in the shooting of an occupied vehicle. Riley was charged for shooting the vehicle, attempted murder, and assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to 15 years to life in prison.
This incident took place at the victim's single family residence located at 781 N Garfield Avenue. The suspect took the victim's property from the top of a dresser in her master bedroom. The point of entry was made through the front door.
While the police officers have rights to investigate suspect, the duty of care of the officers to suspect exist and the officers were under a legal obligation to exercise care for Mr. Hill. ...
Player: case report and emerging medicolegal practice questions. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 6(1), 40-46. doi:10.1111/j.1939-3938.2009.01064.x
This paper assumes that a police officer may or may not have “probable cause to arrest a defendant for armed assault” (AIU, 2016, para 1). I will address if the police officer had probable cause to believe that there is a person hiding in the third person’s garage, attached to the house (AIU, 2016, para 1). Accordingly, the police officer may need or not a warrant “to enter the garage to arrest the defendant” (AIU, 2016, para 2). An examination to “if the officer is in hot pursuit with the defendant” (AIU, 2016, para 2), and if the defendant is known to be injured and armed” (AIU, 2015, para 2). In addition, explain if the police officer probable cause to arrest and search the A and B residences.
This case goes back from the year 1980. A man approached a young woman named Laura Moore at a bus stop in the Spring of 1984. The man disclosed a warning saying “ You shouldn’t be out here alone. Bad guys will pick you up, Let me take you where you have to go.” Moore, 21 at the time , agreed to take the man’s offer. As they both drove off, he then told her to put on her seat belt. When she refused, she states that the man reached under his seat, grabbed a gun and shot her six times. Moore was severely wounded, fortunately she managed to escape, but turned back to study his face. That man was Lonnie David Franklin Jr, now better-known as the serial killer the “Grim Sleeper”. Lonnie David Franklin Jr was convicted of 10-25 women 's murders. The Grim Sleeper murder’s were active during the 1980s and there was a period of time that the killings had stopped. Franklin wanted to keep a low profile. In 2002 the Grim Sleeper’s killing made a surprising return for the community of Los Angeles. For 14 years he remained inactive which raised questions for law
First responders play a crucial role in the establishment of a crime scene. Upon arriving at the scene, the first responders have checked for living victims and have rendered aid. It’s important to create a perimeter around the crime scene (this can be altered if additional evidence is found outside the initial crime scene). Only emergency personnel should enter and exit from the central entry point to control contamination, by creating an exit point; it helps avoid any excessive traffic through the crime scene. By secure the scene to ensure that no evidence is misplaced or damaged, or otherwise compromised. Do a cursory check of the crime scene to obtain any transient evidence and secure any weapons found at the scene (in this case it was already at the scene with the suspect). Crime scene analysts and investigators communicate with first responders and are quickly briefed on the situation, and now a more thorough search can be conducted.