Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Teaching on marriage in corinthians
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Teaching on marriage in corinthians
In 1 Corinthians 7, Paul opens this section in his letter to answering the first of those questions which Corinthians had written to him. From the verse one, it was clear that question had to do with marriage because that place was consisted of a moral dishonesty in their culture which allows all kinds of fornication, adultery, homosexuality, etc. In light of this, some believers had a conception of a marital confusion that, it would be better to be single than facing marriage problems and sexual sin. For that matter, some believers started to divorce their wives in order to be single and more spiritual. In the midst of these problems, Corinthians decided to send a letter to the Apostle Paul in Ephesus requesting his views on this matter. According to MacArthur study Bible, “The letter was probably delivered by Stephanas, Fortunatus and Achaicus.” The whole of the message in chapter seven was written to help the believers in knowing how they can serve God with their circumstance. Especially, how singleness can labor for Christ and marriage believers can glorify God in the marriage.
The first instruction that was given in marriage from Apostle Paul begins in verse 1-9 with synonym that, “It is good for a man not to touch a woman” (V.1). The synonym or euphemism that Paul uses in the verse can be only understood from Jewish content, this is not basically talking about a man to touch a woman or celibate as a normal expression goes, but he was saying it is not good to have a sexual intimacy with a woman whilst you are still a single. He continued to give an accurate explanation in (V.2) of the sexual immorality each one should have his/her own wife or husband to prevent stressing the issue of sexual sin for the singles. From this evi...
... middle of paper ...
...But, unmarried people have more advantages to serve the Lord, then the marriage couples (v. 32). Because, the marriage couples care about how they can please their wife or husband in a worldly things. For this reason; they serve the Lord with problems and expectation. (v.35) Then again, it is not sin to marry, because it prevents “trouble in flesh” meaning the body demands of sexual intimacy (v.28-29). The second reasoning in verse 35 and 28 is that, to be married does not deprive you from serving God, but you can marry and serve the Lord with a diligent heart. With Paul’s encouragement to singleness in Corinthians, it is good to be a singleness believer if one is gifted. Because, singleness have more privileges to labor for the Lord, since they are not bound by any marriage laws of submission. For example, as a widow is not bound by any laws of marriage. (V39-40)
Unfortunately, the text is broken badly, but it still gives us its sexual intent about sexual intercourse in marriage and its image. Philip gives the impression in his writings that one’s earthly marriage is deficient and clearly
According to the Bible, a man must leave his parents and be united with his wife forever. The bible never said that a man must leave his parents, find a woman, cohabit with her, and finally marry her. It is true that certain Christians cohabitate before marriage and are still able to have a divorce-free marriage. However, couple to reduce their chance of divorce must follow the Bible and wait until they become married to live together. By doing so, they will be able to see the real value of marriage, really think about if they really want to marry their partner. As an illustration, a Christian who had followed the Bible rules said, “My wife was a great treasure which I had to patiently wait for” (Sargent). Finally, people should avoid cohabitation to respect the Bible
Throughout many of Paul’s letters there are many debates pertaining to the authorship, destination, date, and the purpose. In the book of Ephesians many scholars debate on the authorship and if Paul actually wrote the letter, or if it was a scribe. Although there are some debates on whether Paul actually wrote it or not, he does refer to himself twice in the letter. In 1:1 and in 3:1 Paul states himself, 1:3 states, “For this reason, I Paul, the prisoner of Christ Jesus for the sake of you Gentiles” (NIV) In verse 1:3 Paul states that he is a prisoner, therefore it is debated that he did not specifically write this because he was imprisoned in Rome at this time. According to Wallace “This, of course, is not to say that the letter must be by Paul, but it is to argue that without such internal testimony, no such claim could be made” (Wallace). Many scholars also debate on the vocabulary usage and the structure of the letter. Some believe that the structure is similar, but the vocabulary seems to be different than his New Testament epistles. Hoehner claims that,” Though the book has a close affinity with Colossians, critics claim that Ephesians is uncharacteristic of Paul” (Hoehner 613). The destination of Ephesians is somewhat debated, but many do believe that the letter was sent to the church of Ephesus. “Some to claim that Ephesus is a better starting point, others suggest Caesarea.” (Wallace) Although this is an argument that has many valid points, it is obvious that Paul was imprisoned in Rome while he wrote Ephesians. It is said by Hoehner that “Ephesians was probably delivered by Tychicus (Eph. 6:21-22), who also took Paul’s letter to Colossians (Col. 4:7-9)” (Hoehner 613). As for the date goes m...
However, it’s evident that Paul had concerns of the people in Ephesus, and the nature of this letter was not addressed to a culture that did not know God, but to one that needed guidance in establishing a relationship with him. Jack J. Gibson stated, “While submission of wives to husbands was commonplace among Greeks and Jews, it was extremely rare for Roman wives to be in submission to their husbands. The average Roman wife did not submit to her husband. Instead, she continued to submit to her father (if she was in the more common marriage without manus), or if she had borne sufficient children and had been emancipated, she submitted to no one.”3
...der? The phrase “one another” is often understood to evoke a sense of reciprocation. However, the word translated “one another” in Greek is the term allÄ“lois and its use in the New Testament often has nothing to do with reiprcol action. The cmman to submit, while understand as a general command for all Christians, is not specifically given directed to husbands. Only the wives receive such instruction. Since Paul says the marriage relationship is patterned after hrist relationship to his church it is impotant to see that there is not eciprocal submission between Christ and his brind; neither is there tobe such between husbands and wives. As a result, while there are mutual obligations for husbands and wives, there is not mutual submission in the recipricol sence.
The book of Romans was written by Paul. It is actually a letter that Paul wrote to the Romans telling them about his understanding of the Gospel. In this book his explains our sins and how we can achieve forgiveness through Christ. The most specific sin that he explains is that of judging one another. He helps address the problem of religious disagreements about different customs or religious convictions. These customs or religious convictions include the days on which people worship the Lord and the things that people will and will not eat. He wrote about the fact that we should not judge each other for God is going to judge us all in the end.
Chapter four addresses the divisions within the Corinthian church, such as jealousy, quarrelling and their defective view of the church. The apostle Paul links their view of the church to church leadership stating “If they had a true view of the church, they would have a true view of the leaders of the church” (p79). The situation was that their view was lower for the church and higher for the leaders thus they were boasting about the leaders. Paul’s view was that the Corinthian church was spoon feed Christians not maturing as they should. Paul’s reference to addressing the church as worldly did not mean they were unregenerate because they did possess the Spirit but they were not being spiritual, not being controlled by the Holy Spirit. He goes on to say “They have experienced new birth by the Spirit but have remained babies in Christ; they have not yet become mature in Christ” (p80) The Apostle most likely would express the same opinion about many Church congregations today. Many churches are elated with their church growth, but it is often superficial. If the church does not offer a real growth opportunity the journey is short lived. The church fills up with Christians not participating in the sanctification process. As with many churches today the Corinthians had a self-serving attitude about themselves and their church. The Corinthians would have never behaved the way they did if they had a higher view of the church and what it stood for and a lesser view of the leaders. Paul outlines three visions of the church “each of which has important implications” (p82). The first metaphor is agricultural: God’s field (v9) 9 For we are co-workers in God’s service; you are God’s field, God...
The flaw that is made hear is the assumption that the reader views the Bible as uninspired by God. Actually, many Christian denominations view the Bible as the inspired word of God. God used imperfect people to create the Bible. Consequently, the previous verse from Genesis is God 's definition of marriage even if the person who wrote those words did not practice
In 1 Corinthians 12-14, Paul set out to address the issues of exclusivity and the divide among the converts of Corinth that has been caused because of spiritual gifts. Paul set a guideline to his converts in Corinth to create order and conduct during times of worship in 1 Corinthians 14:26-33. Doing so, Paul hoped that the divide that has been caused from those with special or “exclusive” spiritual gifts do not cause other believers to become jealous or envious. Paul’s guideline to the Corinthians showed the leadership that Paul had that allowed him to guide the Church to become Hellenistic in just one generation.
In this passage of Scripture Paul begins by making a bold statement concerning sex and marriage. He states, "It is good for a man not to touch a woman" (I Cor.
Fairfax, “Marriage is one of the core values of society. Almost 20 years ago, the well renowned black scholar and psychologist Dr. Na’im Akbar (1991) penned the following: ‘‘marriage is such an important lesson in manhood (womanhood) development. It is no wonder that every society requires some form of it’’ (p. 13).” This coincides with the values that I stated above that were considered important in my culture. Marriage is important to more that my culture obviously but in my culture there is always this well-known quote from the bible: “He who finds a wife, finds a good thing (NKJV Proverbs 18:22). That is basically religion and love in the same
These questions arise from our own desires as Christians to reflect a biblically sound attitude towards sexuality and relationships. That same desire to act according to biblical scriptures is subject to opposition from today’s culture and views about sexual relationships, gender, and roles. A new definition of marriage, sexual orientation, and sexual practices is challenging our relationship with God and our view of human sexuality. Bishop John Spong defines sex and its impact on relationships: “Sex can be called at once the greatest gift to humanity and the greatest enigma of our lives. It is a gift in that is a singular joy for all beings and enigma in its destructive potential for people and their relationships.” (Spong, 1988)
There are varieties of passages in the Old Testament that discuss the metaphor of marriage for the relationship between God/Israel. In the Old Testament, God’s relation with Israel is portrayed as a relationship between husband and wife. The book of Genesis two discuss about the creation of man and woman. Genesis two, God created man and gave him everything in the Garden of Eden, except for the tree of knowledge. God put man in the garden to take care of it. Adam was alone so God made a woman by taking one of the ribs from Adam. This metaphor can be reflected as how God wants to have a relationship with Israel. In Genesis two, God created humans to be the object of His love and creation.
Unlike salvation, Jesus made it clear in Luke 20:34 that marriage was only during this lifetime. Moreover, Jesus told His followers that after the resurrection, people would not get married or arrange to get married. However, that does not mean Jesus did not hold marriage in a high regard. This is reflected in how Jesus approached current issues during His lifetime regarding divorce and remarriage. Moreover, Paul made it clear that those who get married “will have worldly troubles.” Nevertheless, Christ personally addressed this issue establishing His view of divorce based on the Scriptures.
Sex out of wedlock, divorces, childbirth out of wedlock, etc. are all seen as normal circumstances currently. Marriage is an indissoluble bond which means it cannot be broken for the rest of the life after the bond is made. The Church wants to stress the importance of marriage to a relationship and the significance of marriage in reference to Jesus’ loving sacrifice to all. Marriage is a symbol of the sacrifice Jesus made of himself out of love for mankind. Through marriage, the Lord allows us to experience that love with one another as Jesus loves us. Conjugal love can reach that extent of love which all married people are called