Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
digital vs traditional photography
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: digital vs traditional photography
Negative Feelings
Take a print in your hands. A traditional print. Yes, it can be hold, it can be touched, it can be smelled, it can be felt.
This essay themasised the uniqueness of the physical process as well as the thought process of analogue photography.
As Henri Cartier Bresson wrote nicely about the decisive moment "To me, photography is the simultaneous recognition, in a fraction of a second, of the significance of an event as well as of a precise organization of forms which give that event its proper expression.".This moment you are waiting for it is just a fraction of a second, before you press the shutter, you make a personal connection with the scene, and wait for the right moment to shoot. But this right moment, this 125 of a second we are blind, the image exists just in our imagination, as a result to the connection we made before we decided to press the shutter. But the real image, is not there, you have not seen it. It is in captured in the camera, and comes out just after processing the film. You may see your decision 1 hour after the photo was taken or 1 year after the photo was taken.
Buy a film, load the camera shoot it, process it. Why do so many people still bother with the process of analog photography? In the age of digital photography, we get more and more confronted with the words easy,fast and cheap.
Now days we are, as a Black and White photographer, always forced, to stand up for, why we „still“ shoot photographs analogue- which the audience indeed associate with slowness, expensive and complicated. For our time it is perhaps characteristic, that the powerful advertising industries can create such conceptual association, without making the affected people question, if...
... middle of paper ...
...eeps time.
The tip of the pencil meets the paper. The result of an direct impulse, like the light exposes a negative through the diaphragm and fixes what´s in focus.
Digitally delayed time can not keep up with the momentum of what is seen.
It produces a hybrid moment, it leads to a thought image, which is contrary to the gazed-upon and observed one.
In an analogue image the seen is self-evidently coungruent with ones own inner eye.“
-Lothar Baumgarten
Considering all this stages in picture making, every time you press the shutter, it becomes something personal, magical. All the power is given, to be able to absorb and construct at the same time.
You can take a photograph in your hands, swipe gently with a finger over the surface and feel the texture of the paper.
You can hang a photograph on the wall or hide it in a drawer.
2 Gustavon, Todd. Camera: A History of Photography from daguerreotype to Digital. New York, NY: Sterling Publishing, 2009
Photography developed as an art form primarily in the mid to late 19 th century, partially as an alternative to lengthy sittings for a painted portrait. As a result, many of the early photographs were formal, posed still portraits. Some view...
Gregory Crewdson once said “I love the experience of cinema- being enveloped in a complete world of another’s imagination. I love the quality of film- how it can capture so richly the color and light of a scene. And I love photography - for what it leaves unsaid for it is from this that we can start to spin our own imagination.” Crewdson accomplishes the both the most intriguing and frustrating aspect of art; he poses a question yet refuses to reveal the answer. It is the unanswerable question that leads the viewer to study the work and spend hours contemplating its meaning.
A picture is more than just a piece of time captured within a light-sensitive emulsion, it is an experience one has whose story is told through an enchanting image. I photograph the world in the ways I see it. Every curious angle, vibrant color, and abnormal subject makes me think, and want to spark someone else’s thought process. The photographs in this work were not chosen by me, but by the reactions each image received when looked at. If a photo was merely glanced at or given a casual compliment, then I didn’t feel it was strong enough a work, but if one was to stop somebody, and be studied in curiosity, or question, then the picture was right to be chosen.
What, if any impact did photography play in the role of arts ‘evolution’, in particular, what impact did photography have in the works of the impressionist painters. Two obviously conflicting opinions arise through texts by ‘Aaron Scharf’ and ‘Kirk Vanerdoe’. Scharf argues that the impact of ‘snapshot photography’ and the invention and wide distribution of portable camera’s had a significant influence on the works of the painter ‘Degas’. Vanerdoe takes the opportunity to question what makes an influence significant, and tends to see the creation of Impressionism stem from earlier art movements. Then comes the question, what, if any arguments are valid, what arguments are opinions and what can be sieved down to fact.
In this work of art, Walter Benjamin discusses a shift in opinion and its affects in the awakening of the advent of photography as well as film in the twentieth century. He writes of the sense changes within humanity’s entire manner of existence. He gives importance to the way we see the visual work of art. The insightful piece of writing provides a general history of alterations in art in the modern age. Walter Benjamin’s main and central claim is that our human sensory perspective is not intrinsic or natural in any
According to Sontag, a photograph is “able to usurp reality because first of all a photograph is not only an image, an interpretation of the real; it is also a trace, something directly stencilled off the real, like a footprint” . The photographer is able to show reality as one has not seen it before and in turn, the photograph becomes an integral part of the real. Martin Munkácsi, a Hungarian photojournalist defied and transformed the pictorialist fashion image of the late thirties with his customary approach. One particular photograph: ‘Boys at Lake Tanganyika’, epitomized the elements of serendipity and joie de vivre, which later inspired photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson (whom coined the term, The Decisive Moment). Bessayon says: “I couldn’t believe such a thing could be caught with the camera, it made me realize that photography could reach eternity through the moment” .
David Bate discusses this concept of contrasting conventions, whilst looking at what constitutes a surrealist photograph, and acknowledges the enterprises of the surrealist movement. “Surrealism shows itself as an interruption within ‘rational’ discourse...
The camera is presented as a living eye in her work, capable of bending and twisting, contorting reality in its own light. It is at the same time a sensuous device, one that exp...
Some Indian cultures believe that if their picture was taken their soul would become trapped in that photograph. Others believe that a camera captures the true essence of a person. That when you look into the photograph you can see who that person truly was. When you click on that button on a camera you are capturing that moment in time. Later when you examine the product of that moment you can see what that person was feeling at that very moment. Pictures can be moving, they can tell a story, and they can preserve a memory.
In Sontag’s On Photography, she claims photography limits our understanding of the world. Though Sontag acknowledges “photographs fill in blanks in our mental pictures”, she believes “the camera’s rendering of reality must always hide more than it discloses.” She argues photographs offer merely “a semblance of knowledge” on the real world.
Have you ever seen a painting or picture that captivates you and directly stirs up emotion within you? More than likely, you have. Usually, viewers merely observe the picture and enjoy the way it looks and how it makes them feel. But, have you ever asked yourself, “why?” What about the picture makes it pleasing to the viewer? With each strategy the photographer uses creates their own touch and passion that floods all over the picture. The emotional connection nearly goes unnoticed for when the picture is well photographed, the viewers experience the sensation in their subconscious. This is one of the most powerful tools that a photographer holds in their hands. If one can become a master of manipulating how the photo affects its viewers, the said photographer can potentially maneuver people’s minds and thoughts with one click of a button. The time spent with my mentor has opened up the door for me to tap into that power though the use of background, focus, shutter speed, angles, and most importantly, lighting. Even with all these techniques, the person behind the camera must remember that creativity must be at the forefront of all operations. Caleno (2014), when writing about the basics of capturing a beautiful moment in a picture commented, “If we want to be creative we must drop these pre-conceptions and start looking at things from a small child’s innocence.”
This book is a note written by Roland Barthes to record the dialectical way he thought about the eidos(form, essence, type, species) of Photographs. Roland Barthes was a French literary theorist, philosopher, linguist in his lifetime, but surprisingly he was not a photographer. As Barthes had a belief that art works consists with signs and structures, he had investigated semiotics and structuralism. However, through Camera Lucida, he realized the limitation of structuralism and the impression to analyze Photography with only semiotics and structuralism. Barthes concludes with talking about unclassifiable aspects of Photography. I could sense the direction Barthes wanted to go through the first chapter ‘Specialty of the Photograph’. He tried to define something by phenomenology
When going for a walk, a person takes in the beauty around them. On this particular day, the refulgent sun is extra bright, making the sky a perfect blue. White, puffy clouds fill the sky, slowing moving at their own pace. The wind is peacefully calm, making the trees stand tall and proud. There is no humidity in the air. As this person walks down the road, they see a deer with her two fawns. The moment is absolutely beautiful. Moments like this happen only once in a great while, making us wanting to stay in the particular moment forever. Unfortunately, time moves on, but only if there were some way to capture the day’s magnificence. Thanks to Joseph Niépce, we can now capture these moments and others that take our breath away. The invention of the camera and its many makeovers has changed the art of photography.
Photography is a word derived from the Greek words “photos” meaning light and “graphein” meaning draw. The word was first used by John F.W Herschel in 1839. It is a method of recording images by the action of light, or related radiation, on a sensitive material (Bellis, N.D).