The Differences Between Logical, Ethical, and Dialectical Reasoning The ways human think are one of the most distinct differences amongst us all. No single person entire thought process is the same as someone else because every one comprehends differently. The way we think makes us who we are and the decisions we make are based off our thought process. We reason logically, ethically, or dialectically to come to a final decision. Logical, ethical, and dialectical reasoning all serve a different purpose to help us reason the world around us. Logical is a Greek word “logos” which means reason. Logical reasoning is defined as the logic “relating to the formal processes used in thinking and reasoning .” It is an ability to think rationally with supporting evidence. When we think logically we must have a clear reason for our actions. For example, if there were a fire ideally some one would run, grab an extinguisher, or throw water to put out the fire. Those decisions would be logical. We do not contemplate as much when we think logically because it is based off the existing knowledge we have about the situation or the possibilities we can clearly see. We have all heard before “think logical” which means there is no need to think of any other possible outcome then the one that has been presented before. In order to arrive at the best decision inductive, deductive, and abductive reasoning is used. Inductive reasoning presents a conclusion based off the information presented. Inductive reasoning can be risky when the information given is based only off the group being tested. For example some one can say all zebras have stripes with out seeing every zebra. Although this would sound logical, it would be impossible to... ... middle of paper ... ... Fibonicci. (2011, January 1). Logical Reasoning - Fibonicci. Fibonicci RSS. Retrieved January 1, 2011, from http://www.fibonicci.com/logical-reasoning/ Gadamer, H. (1991). Plato's dialectical ethics: phenomenological interpretations relating to the Philebus. New Haven: Yale University Press. Harvey, C. P., & Allard, M. J. (2008). Understanding and managing diversity (4th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). The thinker's guide to understanding the foundations of ethical reasoning (2nd ed.). Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking. Webster, I. (2003). Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary (11th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc. Zalta, E. N. (2002). Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, Calif.: Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University..
Alger, Jonathan. "The Educational Value of Diversity." The American Association of University Professors. Academe, January/February 1997.
Cañas, K. A., & Sondak, H. (2014). Opportunities and challenges of workplace diversity: Theory, cases, and exercises (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
The study of philosophy has become a lost art. Philosophy does not receive credit for the achievements received, when all work stems from philosophy. One important branch of philosophy is logic. Through logic, the world can see how questions are developed, why questions are asked, and how questions are invalid. Many logicians have been formulating hypothesis centering around logic for years. Aristotle and George Boole are two logicians who are extremely well known for their work in the philosophical field and their conflicting viewpoints when considering logic. In the textbook, A Concise Introduction to Logic
Cañas, K. A. & Sondak, H. (2011). Opportunities and challenged for workplace diversity: Theory, cases, and exercises. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
First of all, it is important for us to know what logic in itself is. Logic comes from a Greek word “ logike”Firstly it describes the use of valid reason in performing an activity. Secondly it tends to name normative study of what reasoning is.Logic was studied in several civilizations from China to Greece.
Diversity management initiatives are long term and strategic in focus. They strive not only to recruit, but to actively develop, promote and capitalize on the different skills and perspectives of minority employees (Marquis, 2007.) Every day, peopl...
Gardenswartz, Lee, and Rowe, Anita, Managing Diversity: a Complete Desk reference and Planning Guide. San Diego: Business One Irwin/Pfeifer & company, 1993.
“Logic: The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding.”
1) Irving M. Copi & Carl Cohen. (1998). Introduction to Logic Tenth Edition. Saddle River, New Jersey. Prentice-Hall, Inc Simon & Schuster/A Viacom Company Upper
Diversity management efforts are based on a voluntary commitment to accept each individual’s uniqueness and to respect and learn from individual differences. In fact, diversity management efforts require a great deal of commitment particularly since it includes more than just image based differences (Cole, Salimath). Because it includes all differences and actively works to change prejudicial attitudes and beliefs, diversity management is the perfect complement to affirmative action. Together they can create an inclusive society that is race- and gender-conscious. Being race- and gender-conscious will highlight each individual difference which will facilitate acceptance without judgment and insensitivity.
Diversity is a highly important issue in today’s business, especially in a globalized company. Workplace diversity helps to get better solutions to business problems (Schawbel, 2012). When you have a group of individ...
Anderson, M, L, Taylor, H, F. (2008). Sociology. Understanding a Diversity Society. Thomson Higher Education. Belmont. (USA). Fourth Edition.
Works Cited Rodriguez, Ginger. (1998) Critical Issue: Meeting the Diverse Needs of Young Children. http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/students/earlycld/ea400.htm Jensen, Amy. A. (2010). The 'Standard' of the 'Standard The “Advantages of Diversity in a Classroom”.
Inductive reasoning is logical reasoning where people have a lot of the information and use that to reach a conclusion. It is viewing the available data and figuring out what will be the results. For instance, from an online article, it demonstrates, “Inductive reasoning is a logical process in which multiple premises, all believed true or found true most of the time, are combined to obtain a specific conclusion” (Rouse, 2013). It shows that there are a lot of ideas to analyze and calculate what the possible outcomes will be. It can also be done by looking at patterns. When looking at patterns, it is important to study it to see what is recurring. This makes it possible to predict what will happen based on the knowledge that has been collected. Inductive reasoning is using information or events that have happened in the past to see what is in store for the future.
The logic used to explain miracles of everyday life, thinking logically helps man to question the functioning of everything around us, the logic used to argue and is somehow a thought an idea that influences us for an action we do in our daily lives.