A few activities are in the works at both national and worldwide levels of government to address consumer protection rights. Open records, once the area of country courthouses, can now be made available to anybody over the web at some cost through an online information merchant. Unfortunately, offering this data is not as of now illegal. Reachable data incorporates flow locations, telephone numbers, monikers, property proprietorship, insolvencies, charge liens, common judgments, relatives or flat mate’s names and even a criminal record verification (www.usa-people search.com).
When such organization, called Cellulartrace, can give a PDA follow for a charge. This organization can give an opposite look-up on a PDA number data on a changed or separated cell number or to spot the PDA number itself (www.cellulartrace.com). Numerous individuals accept this is deceptive since stalkers, criminals, and others can use the date maliciously (Belsen, 2006). Besides, Cellulartrace gives a Disclaimer (www.cellulartrace.com/disclaimer.htm), which must be consented to by all who spots requests, that states that the individual asking for the data is, or will use the data for Law implementation, misrepresentation or protection examination, journalistic attempts, examinations of missing persons, finding beneficiaries or beneficiaries, accumulation of monies owed, the area or repossession of sold guarantee, authorized private examination, legitimate examinations, lawful exploration administration of procedure, witness area, criminal dread, cheating anticipation, genealogical examination, misfortune avoidance, item reviews, area of previous patients (medicinal industry just), spotting clients, past clients or duplicity victimized person.
This sugg...
... middle of paper ...
...e web. Indeed Jeb Bush (legislative leader of Florida) had his government managed savings number distributed on his province site and thus on the web. Betty Ostergren, an activist against making open records accessible on the web, indicated this out him, and he had it passed out. Along these lines, she speedily recorded it on her own site. Her focus is that open data may as well stay open not made accessible online (Krim, 2005).
Eventually, Cellulartrace may be furnishing a lawful administration, however morally it is in an exceptionally hazy area. The way that they blanket themselves with an exhaustive Disclaimer is bravo bad for the buyer. Until government and satisfactory laws ensuring customer security rights make up for lost time with innovation anyway, it is each individual for him to attempt to keep however much particular data off internet as possible.
Chamberlain, Kenneth, “History: The Day the Freedom of Information Act Expanded”. Nationaljournal.com 20 Nov. 2012 General OneFile. Web 26 April 2014.
1.Sarah Andrews. Country Reports: An International Survey of Privacy Laws and Development. Electronic Privacy Information Center. Washington, DC, US. 146-158. 2002
The legal justification for the collecting of this data is Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act, which authorizes the government to collect domestic phone records. Section 215 expanded the extent of what could be collected and lowered the standards required to do so. The information that can be collected specifically from phone companies is the number of and length of calls made, but not what the contents of the calls is. There was also an amendment to this section that required law enforcement to have "reasonable suspicion" of terrorist activities before requesting data.
It is apparent that the intentions of the laws for the United States and the EU are to protect the privacy of their citizens. However, loopholes exist in these laws that allow the governments to bend these laws. In the United States, the law prevents the government from asking for certain information, but it does not prevent it from purchasing this information or using matching techniques to discover it.
With the recent technologies, such as the 'Google Glass' and high-tech tracking devices, more and more people are concerned with 'freedom of interference' issues. Often, seemingly harmless text files can track personal information and cellphones can record text messages and phone calls. Although technology has been beneficial to society, it poses serious privacy concerns to users.
...ompanies’ databases without our awareness—much less our approval—the more deeply the Net is woven into our lives the more exposed we become. In order to stop online tracking, we have to take personal responsibility for the information we share and modify our privacy settings. We have to get bills and regulations passed by congress so laws can be made to limit corporations from tracking and sharing our personal formation and discipline and take action upon any corporation that does not abide by the rules.
Exchanging privacy for the benefits of the use of internet. In Plotz's essay “Privacy is Overrated” he want's to convince people to not be too concerned about privacy and to try to be more open. He gives many examples that could convince people into being more open. For example, he writes “But I bet you want to know if your baby-sitter has ever been convicted of child abused, if your business partner has a history of bankruptcy if your boyfriend is still married”(68). Yes I agree that this is tr...
Over the past decade the world has gotten much smaller due to the electronic communication the Internet has fostered. While this promotes business and international relations, problems arise regarding the protection of individuals’ personal information. Many countries around the world have developed privacy policies and laws protect an individual's information in the realm of electronic communication. Universal enforcement gets complicated because the Internet is not restricted to one country; it’s worldwide. As a result, concerns arise regarding the compatibility of various countries' privacy policies. This paper will discuss the current legislation in place for various major countries1, the existing conflicts between these countries’ policies and the implications these conflicts hold for the protection of privacy on the Internet.
The Internet offers many benefits but it also creates many threats that undermines our personal privacy. Concerns about loss of privacy are not new. But the computer's ability to gather and sort vast amounts of data and the Internet's ability to distribute it globally magnify those concerns [1]. Privacy concerns on the Internet are centered on improper acquisition, improper use of personal information such as intrusions, manipulation, discrimination, identity theft, and stalking of personal information. Today the Internet stretches our geographic boundaries and force us to deal with global ethic based on moral principles held to be valid across the cultures. Due to the nature of the Internet, our personal information may be transmitted over the internet and that the transfer of personal information may be made to any country in the world, regardless of the extent of any data protection laws and regulations in any of those countries.
Murphy, Eve M. Caudill and Patrick E. “Consumer Online Privacy: Legal and Ethical Issues.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 19.1 (2000): 7-19.
This paper will examine some of these changes and try to determine if indeed changes are in order. Issues will be presented from the public manager’s perspective and the position of the justice system, relative to their affect upon citizens. Is it necessary to institute some form of desirable control or regulation over the Internet? If so, will an inordinate amount of public freedom be sacrificed in the process? These questions will be addressed, along with analyzing present policy and possible directions for future legislation.
That’s My Tracker.”, written by Peter Maass and Megha Rajagopalan, indicates that the, “...tracking device that happens to make calls...” are exploiting our identities far more than we know (Maass and Rajagopalan,P.129). It was shared that cellphone carriers disclosed and “...responded 1.3 million times last year to law enforcement requests for call data...” without warrants (Maass and Rajagopalan,P.129). These reporters enlighten that all the “explosion of GPS technology and smartphone apps...” as well as “...frictionless sharing...”or “...surveillance has caught our attention so much so that it blinded us from the ugly truth (Maass and Rajagopalan,P.129). In actuality, modern technology such as cellphones and surveillance cameras allow the government to know of it 's citizens location, conversations, and actions—“...treasured by police departments and online advertisers...”(Maass and Rajagopalan,P.130). The mania of technology and “...these invasive services have proved irresistible to consumers…” writes Paul Ohm (Maass and Rajagopalan,P.129). He states that the overly advertised technology is like a magnet to consumers because it continues to be bought and sold regardless of the facts
Are the benefits of electronic communication at the expense of our privacy? How does the Internet affect the availability and use of our personal information? The Internet brings another dimension to the issue of privacy. Whether you are voting on-line or buying a book from Amazon.com you must consider how much personal information has been collected about you, with or without your consent, and how it can be used. Policies governing privacy on the Internet are still not clearly defined and many on-line users do not understand how the information they provide will be used. How much...
In terms of government intelligence, in the information age greatest threats to privacy have been the result of technology and business practices related to e-commerce, marketing and information databases, and not the result of government intrusions (Hoffman, Novak & Peralta, 1997). Nevertheless “all things considered, the increasing and overlapping information sharing by governments and businesses about formerly confidential or private activities generates concerns about potential violations of individual’s privacy rights” (Mace, 2008 cited in Gal, Kantor & Lesk, 2008, p.41).
Staff, Proquest. At Issue: Technology and Privacy. N.p.: ProQuest LLC, 2013. Web. 5 Dec. 2013. .