Dead Poet's Society: Realism vs. Romanticism

1420 Words3 Pages

“Set honor in one eye, and death in the other, and I will look upon both indifferently.” This quote from Brutus catches the essence of Whelton Academy. It claims the parents’ and school’s view of honor as fatal. From all the stress parents weigh upon students at Whelton, they have no choice other than to conform into what their parents want them to be. Conform to fit their parents definition of honor. For the kids at Whelton, this means adopting the humdrum realistic philosophy. In order to do so, students are forced to enroll in specific classes, pursue certain hobbies, get into an Ivy League college, and essentially, live the life their parents want them to live. Neal Perry was one to realize how such a dreadful fate truly was. Todd Anderson was another, and nearly all kids at Whelton shared this epiphany once Mr. Keating came in to teach. His teachings were based off of Romantic beliefs, beliefs that stated one could do whatever they please. Opening the idea of Romanticism to a school that had forever been realistic had set off a battle. A battle between Romanticism and Realistic beliefs. This continuous tug-a-war of philosophy was demonstrated throughout the movie Dead Poet’s Society. Hence, the progression of romanticism is perfectly shown through skepticism, distinctiveness, and self-reliance.These attributes counter three of the school’s original four pillars of character; honor, tradition, and discipline. Excellence though, is the one both have in common, in which Romanticism opens a new, appalling way to reach there.

Leading the way in the battle against realist beliefs was skepticism. In a school where everything remains static, havoc was never within sight of students and teachers. Once Mr. Keating spreads romantic...

... middle of paper ...

...chool’s four pillars of character. There is skepticism which illustrates the diversity of Mr. Keating’s teachings, uniqueness which marks some of the students‘ distinct qualities, and self-reliance which permits students to speak up for themselves. The three of these pillars fit together presents a different way of reaching the fourth pillar, excellence. The chief difference between the two are that one gives happiness while reaching excellence, and the other is the no-control-over-one’s-life way to do it. Should happiness be the way one defines excellence, or should “playing the part of the dutiful son” define excellence? The nine of seventeen not including those expelled chose happiness, and the other eight did not. Though these eight did not understand the true meaning of “Carpe diem”, the others and were will in turn, “seize the day”.

Open Document