The purpose of this report is to compare financial reports from the two largest soft drink manufacturers in the world. The Pepsi Co. and Coca Cola have been the industry's leaders in their market since the early 1900's. I will use relevant figures to determine profitability, and break down key ratios in profitability, liquidity, and solvency. By breaking down financial statements, and converting them to percentages and ratios, comparisons can be made between competitors regardless of size. First, let's take a look at Pepsi Co. to determine profitability, there are several ratios utilized. The profit margin is probably the most popular, This ratio is the net income divided the net sales. This helps identify the amount of net income generated by each dollar of sales. For the year of 2005, the profit margin for Pepsi was 12 1/2 percent. In 2004, the profit margin was 14.4 percent and in 2003 it was 13.3 percent. The profit margin for Coca Cola using the same ratio was at about 17 percent for 2005, down from the previous two years of about 18 percent. The average industry profit margin was at about 11.3 percent (Biz Miner 2005). This means that Pepsi Co was average, and maintain a solid profit. While Coca Cola's profit decreased ever so slightly, it was still higher than the industry average. Another look at profitability can be determined by analyzing the efficiency of each company. To do this, a ratio would evaluate how efficiently assets are used to generate sales( Weygandt 2008) This ratio would be the asset turnover. It uses net sales divided by average assets. In 2005, Pepsi Co's asset turnover was at 1.02 while Coca Cola's asset turnover was at 1.06. These are well below the industry average of about 3.5 (Biz Miner 2005). ... ... middle of paper ... ...istent increase of up to 19% while Coca Cola's dividend growth rate has increased, but only at an average of about 11%. Another factor in which I, as an investor, would consider would be the ROE or return on equity. This is determined by net income dividend by the average common stock holders equity. In 2005, Coca Colas ROE was at 28%, while Pepsi Co's was also at 28%. But a review of a 10 year period(dividendgrowthinvestors.com) reveals that Pepsi Co. has been strong between 28 to 34%, while Coca Cola has been around 25 to 33%. That fact that Pepsi Co. has steadily outperformed Coca Cola on the rate of returns to its investors confirms my decision to lean towards Pepsi Co. Don't be misinformed, both companies are strong performers and lead their industry in most every category. I recommend any potential investor to do the math and research for themselves.
At the end of 1991, PepsiCo had EBITDA of $2.1 billion or operating profit margin of 10.8% - down from profit margins of 12.2% and 11.7% in 1990 and 1989, respectively. In addition, net sales only grew by 10.1% in 1991 – considerably low versus growth of 16.8% and 21.6% in 1990 and 1989, respectively. Recent acquisitions of Taco Bell franchises in 1988, bottling operations in 1989, Smiths Crisps Ltd. and Walkers Crisps Holding Ltd. in 1989, and Sabritas S.A. de C.V. in 1990 aided sales in growth in 1989 and 1990. Additionally, a joint venture with the Thomas J. Lipton Co. in 1991 to develop and market new tea-based beverages may lead to greater sales in the future. However, there is some need for an immediate return on its investments in order to sustain historical revenue growth and increase the current profit margins.
To summarize, Pepsi tries to create a new target audience which is adults. Compared to Coca-cola, Pepsi does it more fair and success to create a more divine atmosphere. In my point of view, this is a winning concept in the long run.
...g changes between October 18th and November 22nd, with $39.24 and $39.87 respectively. The Coca-Cola Company's performance comparative to the industry and to its main opponent PepsiCo has been weak and the future seems trends will remain the same. After lower hopes for the future and a reduction in incomes due to procedure costs and weak sales the company is increasing their asset in the invention research and advertising. The Wall Street Journal reported that the average reply of investment specialists is that "holding" the stock is the best choice for an investor. At this point, as traditional stockholders, Due to the jump in price from $39.24 to $40.39 you would have earned 2.47% on your speculation. In end, the Coca-Cola Co. is a gainful investment. Dependent on the type of depositor, decisions made will control your return on your share with the Coca-Cola Co.
Coke continuously out-stands Pepsi, even though they share a very similar taste and colour, however Coke should not be the drink that receives all the love and attention for what it offers. Despite their similar soda colour, the drinks actually contain some different ingredients, which produce a different taste, and affect the body differently. Furthermore, the way the companies markets their drinks makes a huge contribution to how successful their products will become. The major element for success however stems from their impact on society and how the companies utilize their social power to evolve. The two major soda companies are constantly head to head with one another, yet it is what they do that sets them apart.
The Beverage Industry is a highly competitive one and tends to be dominated by a few major actors. The two biggest worldwide known and most influential companies are Coca-Cola and Pepsi. The limited growth opportunities make this competition very intense, requiring companies to follow the trends and be always aware of the competitors' progress. However, the demand for the products depends a lot on the economic conditions within the society. Those few big players enjoy the benefits of the strong loyal customer base during the growth and stability stage in the economy, whereas in times of economic difficulties customers turn to cheaper substitutes. Thus, although the key feature of the industry is that it is very difficult for a new unknown company to enter the market and compete with well-known long-established businesses, the companies should pay significant attention to the new entrants, especially in times of economic instability. Consumer tastes are also seasonal, meaning that the demand for the carbonated beverages is higher during the hot months of the year. Shifting consumer preferences bring the concern of operating uncertainty, which greatly affects pricing strategies. The large companies pay reliable dividends...
This is all thanks to the company's ability to stay competitive in the world marketing competitive environment. "The competitive environment, also known as the market structure, is the dynamic system in which your business competes. The state of the system as a whole limits the flexibility of your business."-Stan Mack(CHRON) The ability to stay flexible in todays market has enabled company to create revenue through adapting to changing views of the consumers. Although the first thought when hearing the Coca Cola name is still soda, the trend of non-carbonated and sugary drinks is the most revenue producing products of the company today. Don't get it wrong, the company still has 4 name brand sodas that bring in over $1 billion apiece in revenue annually, but the most substantial revenue is the companies investment in non-carbonated and sugar-based drinks. Products such as Smart Water, Vitamin Water, and Fairlife Superkids(milk) are among the nearly 400 products produced by the company that are not soda-related.(Fortune) So even with soda sales at the 30-year low, The Coca Cola Company continues to adapt to the ever-changing competitive market environment and sustain its household name and
Therefore, the long-term brand of Coca cola and better pricing strategies would help in competing with Pepsi. Unlike, Pepsi, Coca cola had targeted entering into partnership and alliances with local distributors and firms. This helps to develop strong relationship within the domestic firms to reduce the domestic barriers and thus, enhance the company’s competitiveness (Thabet, 2015). Lastly, the Asian markets consist of related and supporting industries to the soft drink industry that helps the companies in gaining a strong competitive position in the markets. Based on the competitive advantage of nation’s model, Coca cola has more home based advantages to develop a competitive advantage in relation to other countries on a global
Analysis of the Coca-Cola Company The Coca-Cola Company is the world's leading manufacturer, marketer and distributor of soft-drink concentrates and syrups. The Coca-Cola Company is the world's leading manufacturer, marketer and distributor of soft-drink concentrates and syrups. The Company markets many of the world's top soft drink brands, including Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Sprite and Fanta. Through the world's largest and most pervasive distribution system, consumers in nearly 200 countries enjoy the Company's products at a rate of more than one billion serving a day.
Coca –Cola (KO) is one of the world’s largest beverage companies. Company was incorporated in September 1919 under the State of Delaware law and headquarters is located in Atlanta Georgia. But from 1886, company established its brand in US (Coca-Cola, 2012, p. 1). Currently company is providing for more than 500 varieties of non-alcoholic sparkles to the customers around the world. Apart from this, company also serve for still beverages that includes enhanced water, water, ready-to-drink, juices, energy drink, sport drinks and so on.
... which has a large impact on the general business. Coca Cola Amatil has also reported that a key area for growth is in bottled water with the market growing and with 2012 market share of 34% in Australia, 31% in New Zealand and 1% in Indonesia, there is potential to grow in this segment. Coca Cola Amatil reported 16% grocery growth in non carbonated soft drinks which was driven by Mount Franklin Water which shows that progress is being made in this area.
Their advertising techniques set them apart as Coca-Cola still seems to market themselves as a “classic” company, and Pepsi seems to be more interested in modern methods market themselves. I am not discrediting anything that is classic, but as the world continues to grow and innovate we must move with it, if we continue to live in the past we will be left behind. Coca-Cola’s included image of Marilyn Monroe, a “classic” icon, and Pepsi’s included image of Beyoncé Knowles, a “modern” icon proves this point, which is why would Pepsi’s advertisement is more effective at attracting
Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo are two of the largest and most profitable corporations of the United States. They both invest tens-of millions of dollars per year in worldwide marketing campaigns. If you go to each of their websites you can see they are both capitalized in unlike products. Both of these companies are trying to target the same market but through their websites they have a very distinctive marketing approach.
A brand can be described as the sentiments people have regarding a product offered in the marketplace; however, it is not the name, logo or the symbol of a product. The brand is an expectation which individuals have for as establishment’s commodities or amenities. Branding is defined as the process of producing reactions and impression between the business and the consumers of the products they offer. It is commanded by the audience, and an establishment has no control over what the consumer's perception of the commodities. In the marketplace, branding commands the reputation that a business produces for itself. The content which I have selected to concentrate on developing in this paper will take a comprehensive analysis of the brand “Coca-Cola.”
The Coca Cola Company has been among the world’s top companies that have been able to perform well in all the areas of the world. The company follows the latest strategic research and evaluation methods to formulate such strategic policies that helps in not only meeting the customer expectations and desires but also achieving various organizational goals and objectives.
...e and Pepsi’s already established image as producers of premium product is key to discouraging other companies from entering the soft drink industry. However, as the market in the U.S has leveled off, they should continue to invest globally in marketing and advertising for further profit growth, which will in turn positively influence their well established brands to further increase soft drink sales and profits.