Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
resistance for organisational change internal and external
resistance for organisational change internal and external
resistance for organisational change internal and external
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Effective organizational change requires an alteration in patterns of employee behavior (Spector, 2010). There are many reasons why stakeholders can be resistant to change including but not limited to; misunderstanding, self-interest, inability to adapt and disagreement with the change. It is management’s job to understand this resistance and effectively combat it. There are several tools that can be used to combat resistance to organizational change to increase the chances of effective organizational implementation. This paper will look at some of the essential tools and elements I would use to combat resistance to organizational change. In addition, I will discuss what elements I feel are essential in most situations and why. Mutual Engagement One of the most basic but sometimes underutilized tools is communication and education through mutual engagement. It is up to organizational leaders to help create and maintain a context that allows, encourages, and enables an open and candid dialogue (Spector, 2010). The goal of mutual engagement in a process of shared diagnosis is to unfreeze “social habits” and create a sense of dissatisfaction with the status quo (Spector, 2010). At its most fundamental level, diagnosis is about learning: learning what needs to be changed and why. The notion of shared diagnosis goes one step further. For change implementation to occur effectively many employees at multiple hierarchical levels and in varied units need to change in the same direction (Spector, 2010). It takes more than one person can facilitate change, diagnosis has to be shared by multiple individuals to effectively move toward implementation. One tool that can be used to improve mutual engagement is the force field analy... ... middle of paper ... ..., and understanding what drives resistance can be very powerful in its elimination. There are steps that can be taken to help in the successful implementation and reducing resistance is the most important. Sometimes just having a plan is not enough. It is also important to plan for resistance and develop strategies to deal with its effects. Works Cited Palmer, I., Dunford, R., & Akin, G. (2009) Managing organizational change: A multiple perspectives approach. (2 nd ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill Spector, B. (2010). Implementing Organizational Change: Theory Into Practice. (2nd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Prosci Change Management Series. Retrieved from http://www.change- management.com/prosci_change_series.pdf Tucker, J. (2007). Resistance to Change. Retrieved from http://jantucker.suite101.com/resistance-to-change-a28593
Change affects more than just a program or a process within an organization, change affects employees, collecting data on employee’s readiness and willingness to accept a change will help leaders know if the organization is socially ready for change (Cole, Harris, and Bernerth, 2006). A change might be positive for an organization but if the employees who will be affect by the change are lost in the process then it could create a greater issue than not making the change. Leadership needs to communicate and inspire the employees to be positive toward the change, seeking to enhance their job satisfaction not make changes that will increase their desire to leave. This data is best collected early in the change initiative allowing leadership to properly cast the vision while addressing concerns. This requires leadership to create platforms for employees to engage in the change initiative freely (Ford, 2006). Employee attitudes can be measured through these dialogues providing leadership with necessary measureable data (Hughes, 2007).
Change is actually one of the things in life that can never be avoided, no matter how hard we try; it is the one constant in life. When it comes to organizations however, change can often be difficult, if not impossible, depending on a number of factors including employee receptiveness. There have been many studies completed on the cause of resistance to change. In Coch and French’s research study (1948) they asked two important questions surrounding resistance, “(1) Why do people resist change so strongly? and (2) What can be done to overcome this resistance?” Most change program experts will certainly name resistance to change as one of the largest obstructions to successfully executing change programs.
Organizations are preserved by change and constant renewal; otherwise, they will stagnate and die (Marquis & Huston, 2015). Leading change can be one of the most challenging tasks for a leader. Many times attempts at change fail because the person trying to implement the change was ill prepared to deal with resistance and used an unstructured
Change is a fact of organizational life that develops in response to interpersonal, cultural, environmental, and other external factors that fluctuate and change for various reasons. Employees can display varying levels of resistance ranging from aggressive resistance to apathy (Spector, 2012). Resistance is a concern because it undermines the effectiveness of the change implementation process, but there are tools available which leaders can utilize to reduce this possibility. The essential tools will be discussed in this paper along with the reasons for utilizing them in a change implementation process.
...(2012). Two Paradigms about Resistance to Change. Organization Development Journal, 31(3), 59-71. Retrieved June 19, 2014, from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/results?sid=9921a9b5-b8d8-44fb-b3dc-38ef3355abde%40sessionmgr4001&vid=2&hid=4208&bquery=resistance+AND+%22to%22+AND+organizational+AND+change&bdata=JmNsaTA9RlQmY2x2MD1ZJnR5cGU9MCZzaXRlPWVkcy1saXZl
All people resist change even from the top of the organization down to the level of people doing the work for many reasons, mostly due to the way it alters the company’s culture. For instance, people resist change because of the uncertainty it brings, like fear of losing their jobs, fear of their capabilities, and even outcomes or failures of the past, or to challenge managers in proving the decision is wrong. Even CEOs will resist change if they see no rewards (Tanner, 2017). However, this list could go on, especially with the global economy, the rate of technological growth, change, it is enviable for companies’ survival, and change should not be resisted. Thus, the bottom line is management should expect resistance to change and learn how to manage the resistance, and provide and get feedback from all of those who are involved in identifying the gaps to why the people feel the way they
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used
Organizational changes are constant in both the public and private sector. Some changes are small and easily managed and others are large scale vision changes. With organization-wide changes, such as a redirection in the organizations vision, strong creative leaders are needed to ensure the vision is sold to the employees and that the change is implemented smoothly. The Virginia Department of Corrections (VADOC) has recently changed visions to strengthen the way we create long term public safety. This change in mission and vision statements was a smooth process but has not been implemented without its share of issues.
Implementing change in the workplace is a dynamic process. Although change itself can be controlled and limited to some degree, innovation is substantially even more dynamic. This dynamic, unpredictable process introduces vulnerability, which can lead to employee frustration. Just as the scenario addresses, many individuals become motivated at the thought of change and innovation; however, the change does not occur due to resistance or other obstacles. Much of this resistance arises from the unpredictability and vulnerability of the process. Managers must be able to prevent or manage resistance by using tools and strategies to smooth the process.
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Johnson, R. (1976). Management, systems, and society: An introduction. Pacific Palisades: CA, Goodyear Pub. Co.
Managing resistance starts with dialogue that engages and reveals the underlying reasons for resistance (A. Gilley, J. Gilley, & Godek, & 2009). Resistance to change is a complex issue and managers and leaders need to take the time to understand why and where the resistance is coming from if they have any chance of being successful. There are numerous reasons why an employee might be resisting the change and there are lots of approaches to address resistance, but without understanding why there is resistance, leaders are unprepared to deal with the issue. Therefore, leaders need to make the time to involve employees in the process, understand and respect their concerns, and work towards clear and focused goals.
Change in an organization occurs when an organization identifies an area of where necessary change must be undertaken, examines it thoroughly and adapts to it. This may lead to gaps where employees may not adapt to a certain change and therefore it is important that an organization takes into considerati...
... Worley, C.G. 2006, p.11) is two significant factors that make the organization’s change difficult. Management systems are designed affects every level in the organization structures and processes when make change. On the other hand, people rewarded for stability impact organizational change seriously because people like working in a stability environment and they resist change. It is very difficult for organization to make changes in those two areas.
Individuals go through a reaction process when they are personally confronted with major organizational change (Kyle, 1993; Jacobs, 1995; Bovey & Hede, 2001). Within this process there are four phases that it consists of: initial denial, resistance, gradual exploration, and eventual commitment (Scott & Jaffe, 1988; Bovey & Hede, 2001). Resistance to change is the initial area to focus on. The issues of organizational change and resistance to change have received a lot of attention over the past decade (Macri, Tagliaventi & Bertolotti, 2002). The perceptions of individuals play a fu...