Internet censorship is controlling what a user could and could not see. Even though an individual merely searches for something as little as cats, Internet censorship still occurs. It is this unnecessary censorship that is killing young minds today. Internet censorship can be carried out in many ways. A government agency for instance can do it; or the worst of all, a private organization, looking at you AT&T. Even though business firms may think that they are stopping individuals from receiving “unsafe” information, they are in fact doing the opposite. By censoring something that started out as a distribution channel for “free-information,” the business firms and governmental organizations not only harm themselves, but the future generations too that rely abundantly on the Internet for information. Internet censorship is a curse and should have no place in such a high technology oriented world.
To begin with, net neutrality is a major thing that is needed. Everyone lives with and uses the Internet. It is like a child to his or her mother; the mother has to take care of the child. Recently, the FCC announced that it would push for the “ death of net neutrality” which would mean that all Internet traffic would be treated equally (Abbruzzese). Let’s pretend that our ISPs (Internet Service Providers) are freeways on which our data travels. With net neutrality, ISPs would not be able to open up new lanes for “fat users,” that is everyone would have the same speed limit (Abbruzzese). By doing this, not only will the information be not available at an instant, it would make the situation worse than it already is.
The picture on the right, explains this horrendous thing that the FCC is pushing for. The Internet would become similar to...
... middle of paper ...
...eb. 16 May 2014.
Nunziato, Dawn C. Virtual Freedom: Net Neutrality and Free Speech in the Internet Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law, 2009. Print.
Pepitone, Julianne. "SOPA Explained: What It Is and Why It Matters." CNNMoney. Cable News Network, 17 Jan. 2012. Web. 14 May 2014.
Abbruzzese, Jason. "The FCC and Net Neutrality: What You Need to Know Before Thursday." Mashable. Mashable.com, 15 Mar. 2014. Web. 15 May 2014.
Steward, Bart. "Here's How to Contact the FCC in Support of Net Neutrality! - Bart Stewart." Bart Stewart. N.p., 3 Mar. 2014. Web. 15 May 2014.
"Websites Go Dark to Protest SOPA." CBSNews. CBS Interactive, 18 Jan. 2012. Web. 16 May 2014.
"China’s Internet Censorship | China Law & Policy." China Law Policy RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 May 2014.
"Cyber Security Bill CISPA Is Passed - Security Affairs." Security Affairs RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 May 2014.
The emergence of the Internet and the World Wide Web brought upon a medium of communication with a range of opportunities for the world. However, this medium is, in due course, subject to the control of a few major companies. The enigma of information flow is the central concern of net neutrality. Consumers, competition and network owners would benefit directly from the regulation of network neutrality because it would provide a positive impact to those parties as well as provide equality.
At the beginning of 2012, a series of coordinated protests occurred online and offline against Stop Online Piracy Act Bill (SOPA) that expands U.S. law enforcement’s ability to combat online copyright infringement. As this protest involved many influential websites like Google and Wikipedia, it certainly draws national attention on SOPA. Whether censorship should be used online against online materials infringing property rights, as included in SOPA, is the controversial issue. Even though SOPA eventually was terminated by the Congress, things behind SOPA cause further debates. The relationship between censorship, free speech and copyrights in this bill is worth discussing. In SOPA, copyrights are enforced by censorship, but censorship at the same time violates free speech. Although SOPA’s online censorship on unauthorized online material is an effective method to protect internet copyrights, it resistants innovation and compromises freedom of speech.
Schmidt, E. E., & Cohen, J. (2014, March 11). The Future of Internet Freedom. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from
A recent and hotly debated topic among businesses, politicians, and internet users in the United States is that of net neutrality. With the rise of the internet over the past few decades, laws and regulations have struggled to keep up with the ever changing environment. As such, the problem of whether net neutrality should be enforced, and to what extent, has been a dividing issue. This problem has come into the public’s attention recently due to infringements and controversy surrounding policies by Internet Service Providers (ISPs). In the following paragraphs, I plan to first define the concept of net neutrality, related topics which are crucial for an informed ethical discussion of the topic, and also related cases in which net neutrality
There are over 2,405,518,376 internet users on a global scale. More than 50% of the world have a form of Internet censorship, and of those countries China, North Korea, Iran, and Vietnam heavily restrict its citizens. This recent topic has reached new heights in the US with the growing number of access to internet. More and more people are debating whether the internet should be censored. Internet censorship is the control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the internet. This would affect everyone and me. I specifically use the internet to read about controversial view and other information that gets ignored by the media or isn’t circulated anymore. Most of these sites would fall in the black list of censoring. A small percentage of users post conspicuous posts, graphic material, and infringing copyright links. Although inappropriate it shouldn’t demand internet censorship, because it goes against the individual rights of the people. Freedom of speech and press will be restricted by the government. To a point where people would be scared to express themselves, or spread information for they might be punished. Even if their opinion is erroneous and maleficent, it’s still that person’s opinion and he’s entitled to it. Same can be said for the common good everyone should be able to voice their opinions without censorship anywhere. Everyone should also have the access to any information on the internet. If anyone is offended by what is said on the internet, then they can remember to not visit the webpage next time and hold themselves accountable. This paper will examine the issue of internet censorship constituting a violation to the American people individual rights, common good, and the constitution.
ISPs, including ATT, express concern about the proposed rules of Net Neutrality that would prohibit it from slowing competitors’ web traffic or accessing content (Shatz). By not allowing the ability for ISPs to regulate its network and the bandwidth that moves through it, it can cause a variety of problems that un...
Berners-Lee’s creation of the world wide web has allowed millions upon millions of people to connect and share their ideas in a way that is instantaneous and free. Accessing the internet itself costs no money, it’s acquiring the connection that often costs money. The companies that provide this connection are called ISPs or internet service providers, unfortunately many cities only offer a few options when it comes to ISPs, this lack of competition in the market often creates a monopoly or duopoly where one or two companies provide internet for an entire city, having complete control over the prices they offer and the services they allow. The Obama era net neutrality rules which were repealed by Trump’s FCC “required internet service providers to offer equal access to all web content without charging consumers for higher-quality delivery or giving preferential treatment to certain websites” (Collins), without these regulations service providers can slow service for companies and consumers that don’t pay premiums, creating a discriminatory environment where companies might interfere with comments that make them look bad, block certain applications that they compete with, remove access to union sites during a labor issue, or increase their own profit by making developers pay more to avoid having their data
In recent events, net neutrality has been under attack by the modern telecommunications companies from our age. The attacks threaten the future of the internet which includes free speech, innovation, and social, economic balance of the affected country which is the United States of America.
Net Neutrality is a politically charged topic in the United States, and has been for several years now. Both sides of the issue are attempting to influence the US Federal Communication Commission (FCC), which theoretically has the power to decide the matter. During the Obama administration, the FCC ruled that Internet Service Providers must operate in a net neutral manner. Since then, the membership of the FCC has changed and now the FCC is moving to rescind that ruling. Neither position has been tested in court. So, the ultimate position is in flux…
August, Oliver. "The Great Firewall: China's Misguided — and Futile — Attempt to Control What Happens Online." Wired.com. Conde Nast Digital, 23 Oct. 2007. Web. 22 Nov. 2013.
The net neutrality debate has risen once again and taken the country by storm. Supporters of net neutrality - the concept of a completely free and unbiased internet - and the supporters of a regulated, or tiered internet system, that would make people pay for faster internet or faster access to certain services go back and forth constantly. United States Congress and the Federal Communications Commission have differing stances on this issue, along with plenty of American consumers. Governing broadband poses internet service providers with the ability to slow or speed up internet access based on how much people pay for the service. To stop this from happening, net neutrality supporters have made it their mission to attempt to keep a free internet by fighting these restrictions.
The internet is one of the most freely used resources and is easily accessible by anyone. It is the one place where there should be rules or guidelines, but in reality there exists very little. Preserving the openness of the internet and retaining internet freedom are the driving forces behind “Net Neutrality.” Under this principle, consumers are free to choose what applications and services to use and they can decide what legal content to access, create, host or share such as photos, videos, social networks, music, blogs, and websites. The openness promotes healthy competition, encourages investors to allocate capital/stock in online ventures/innovations or launch new applications.
Zelnick, Robert, and Zelnick, Eva. Hoover Institution Press Publication : Illusion of Net Neutrality : Political Alarmism, Regulatory Creep, and the Real Threat to Internet Freedom. Stanford, US: Hoover Institution Press, pp.2-5, 2013. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 23 August
Stewart, William. Key Internet Features - Freedom of Speech. Living Internet. Retrieved 20 April 2004.
The Internet is an extremely educational and communicative tool. Everyone can access a tremendous amount of information and connect with people on the other end of the planet; it is capable of doing everything. Nowadays, the society is facing a variety of challenges and controversies which are mostly related to religion, morality, the economic crisis, etc., and the most talked-about issue in today’s world is “Internet censorship”. Although the Internet is very useful, many people are suggesting the idea of censoring the Internet; however, the government should not censor the Internet because a free and open Internet usage has many positive impacts on people’s lives.