Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of sex education
Effects of sex education
Sex education for children and adolescents
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of sex education
There has been censorship since the times of the early Catholic Church with it dictating what you could and could not do. The people of the United States have looked back upon what was being done, and have expressed that it was wrong for the church to such a thing. However, the leaders of today seem to be hypocritical in the subject. They say that it was bad once, but today it is okay. Censorship is most prominent in books today, and the most common to be thrown out are the ones that have obscene language and sexual references. There are many examples of this; however, the few that are best known are: The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., and The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain. The banning of books, such as these, blocks the meanings that these mature and experienced authors are putting forth to the world. The Catcher in the Rye is a classic novel written by J.D. Salinger that portrays the life of a confused teenager in New York City. The main character is a teenager that has been a delinquent throughout his life. Holden Caulfield says, “I forgot to tell you about that. They kicked me out [of Pencey]” (Salinger 4). The banning of the book begins when Holden starts to act like the delinquent that he has been described as. The book has a very strong vocabulary of words that are to this day considered inappropriate. As stated in Sweet “The Catcher in the Rye is one of the most barred from libraries and courses, ostensibly because of its sexually provocative language, but probably because of its alienated and irrelevant attitude toward the world” (Sweet 3). For example, the first of the strong language starts in the first paragraph of the book. On the topic of the history of his li... ... middle of paper ... ... parents do not object to sex education any more than they object to dictionaries, but when it is a question of what their teenage sons and daughters will read in school, they may prefer to replace materials that contain highly explicit illustrations or suggestive prose (Sweet 3). The quote says that teenagers take sex education, but is it really just the teenagers. From a personal perspective, I was first taught sex education while in elementary school. Should society really be worried about what teenagers read more than what children, whose age is still in the single digits, learning about sexual intercourse? Society should stop worrying about what their children read, and more on the progression of their children toward adulthood at too early an age. The banning of books blocks the meanings that these mature and experienced authors are putting forth to the world.
The main reason vehement adults want to ban The Catcher in the Rye is its frequent use of cursing, sexual themes and conversations, and mild violence. Contrary to these adults’ beliefs, these are all integral parts of adolescence, and therefore are shown as a part of Holden’s weekend alone. If anyone who tried to get this book banned listened in on high school hallway conversations, they would find that these “offensive” words are as much a part of our vocabulary as anything else. (I wouldn’t subject them to tha...
Censorship is becoming more and more common all over the world today. The online Encarta Encyclopedia defines censorship as, "supervision and control of the information and ideas that are circulated among the people within a society. In modern times, censorship refers to the examination of books...for the purpose of altering or suppressing parts thought to be objectionable or offensive." Henry Reichman from the Education World website defines it as, "the removal, suppression, or restricted circulation of literary, artistic, or educational materials . . . on the grounds that these are morally or otherwise objectionable in light of the standards applied by the censor" (Cromwell). Definitions aside, great literature is being banned by many people for a number of reasons and shouldn't be.
Sex Education is essentially the teachings of human sexuality in regards to sexual anatomy, reproduction, intercourse and behaviors associated. Learning about these aspects is important to adolescent development as it is a natural part of life. One way children learn about this is through school or somewhere in their community such as an after school program. Though it seems like an obvious lesson to learn, children have a difficult time getting this information from any source other than an organized curriculum in their health class at school. This is somewhat understandable as it can be very uncomfortable for parents and guardians to discuss these intimate details with their innocent child but it has the potential to cause problems later in the adolescent’s life. Brewin’s article addresses the parental concern that sex education may actually stir sexual desires and behaviors in the children that were not present before (Brewin.) However, curiosity comes about naturally and if it is met with over-protectiveness and suspicion from parents then the child has no other choice but to get the facts from another source which could possibly be firsthand experience.
In the past and today, books have been censored for vulgar language, the acts of violence, and sexual content. Books have also been censored for being too adult-like. The Catcher in the Rye’s censorship is debatable; in my opinion, if I had to pick a reason it would be because Holden was trying to be an adult although he was still a kid. He is in between the same world of an adult and a child; he uses the same words of an adult but continues to act like a child (Wiginton). When he was not around people he knew, or around the people he knew most, he tried to be more adult-like by ordering alcoholic beverages and smoking cigarettes.
All in all, Books should be made and not censored just for it's 'vulgarity' or 'socially obscenity' they should be written, manufactured, just like any regular book. Without them, important values and information could not be available for future
"Censorship cannot eliminate evil. It can only kill freedom. We believe Americans have the right to buy, stores have the right to sell, authors have the right to write and publishers have the right to publish constitutionally protected material. Period." (“Banned Books and Authors”). Harry Hoffman, president of Walden Book Co., Inc., is accurate in this aspect. When books are censored or banned, they are not eliminated from society; however, their message emanates to create an impact. Even if the public conceals the content in these books, the victims that these censors sequester from these works are rarely unexposed to what is being censored to them. By challenging or attempting to ban a book, more attention is drawn to that distinct book, so society is more likely to read it. So in all actuality, censors have no tangible reason to ban the books, especially since it violates so many legal and ethical standards; book banning violates the First Amendment, it takes away the meaning of the books, and it withholds morals that could be taught in schools.
When our country was founded in 1776, it was founded on the liberty of expressing and having your voice be heard which gave us the first amendment. Part of the first amendment is freedom of speech which lets many authors express themselves through words and informing readers about real world issues that nowadays people just ignore, and information that might be essential to someone on the days come forth .By challenging, banning or censoring a authors book you're basically restraining them from using their first amendment. When censoring a book it’s censoring a part of a book that either one or more have found offensive and with banning its the whole book. Banning or challenging a book is absurd , no one has the right to decide for everyone
In the past, sex was something that people tried to avoid talking about it, neither less teaching. Sex became a mystery, and a mystery would always trigger people’s nerves, especially teenager’s curious minds. That leads teenager at that time, who had no idea about sex, wanted to have sex to know about it. And when they had sex without any protection, they easily got STDs or HIV or even pregnancy. The case awakens society that sex education must be taught for students at the very first when they enter middle schools. But the way sex was taught those days was very much different from today. In the article “What the sex educators teach” posted on the Opposing View Point in Context website, Dana Mack has written about her experience when taking sex education class when she was a teen: “At the age of ten or eleven, girls and boys were herded into separate rooms - usually in the company of a parent. There, in industrial-gray pictures and solemn monotones, they were introduced to the world of gametes, ovaries, and menstruation. Not exactly titillating material, this reproductive information.” (Mack). Back in those days when sex was a newly revealed topic and sex education program had just been operated, people are still very shy to talk about sex and they often avoid having this kind of
"Books are dangerous. They make you think feel wonder . They make you ask questions (Weiss p.2)."
Strasburger conveys the message that there is a problem with sexual education and urges his readers to do something about it. Teens should be able to make educated decisions, so they can protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and be able to maintain that safety from teenage years to adulthood. The bulk of sexual education programs within the United States are not assisting teens to achieve and uphold these standards. Sexual education curriculum in the United States needs to be examined on both a federal and state level, and comprehensive sexual education programs must be implemented.
The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional. Censoring school books in libraries can often lead to censorship of our basic freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. In some cases, a minority ends up dictating the majority in censorship cases. To be told what is permissible reading material and what is not is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Have you ever wondered about the impact book censorship has on our society? Book Censorship is when a government official or someone with power decides to ban a book, based on the information inside. We should have Book Censorship in schools because kids should be exposed to the real world, Some parents rely on schools to prepare their kids for real life, and kids will mature easier.
The censorship of books is a division of censorship that, apart from Internet censorship, receives the most publicity. Banning books is the most popular form of such censorship. Many banned books are literary classics, such as The Catcher in the Rye, by J.D. Salinger, which was listed as the number 6 most challenged or banned book in a list compiled by the American Civil Liberties Union in 1997.
Sex education, as it is understood today, was unknown until about 200 years ago. Since children were taking part in almost all adult works, sexual knowledge was acquired automatically with all other kinds of knowledge. “Facts of life”, such as bathing, sleeping together in the nude, discussing about pregnancy, and giving birth at home were never a secret. Therefore, the idea that parents or other communities such as schools have a responsibility to teach young people about sex is a modern concept. In other words, the formal movement of sex education started in the early twentieth century when families started growing up in the cities rather than farms. During that time, American reformers were among those who were more focused on dangers of twin anxieties known as medical and moral decline which were resulted from lacking sex education among youths in the society (Moran). With the new outbreaks of sexually transmitted diseases, unwanted pregnancies, and the fact that sexually active people are becoming younger, sex has become a daily topic.
Lastly, most people forbid teenagers from learning about sex in school at early age because the information given promotes them to sexually active at younger age. Provenly by World Health Organization (WHO) who reviewed a scientifically controlled research in US and abroad, those who were educated about sex at their younger age from school create no problem about sexual