Business Strategy of Company BMW Group

2001 Words5 Pages

In order to identify BMW Group’s internal strengths and weakness, here applied strategic capability which combined three keys of resource: tangible resources, intangible resources, and competences. All of these resources enable a company to attain a sustainable competitive advantage (Dess et al, 2010). Tangible Resources are physical and financial assets that BMW uses to create value for the customers. In 2012, BMW’s financial report shows a sharp increase in revenues by 11,7% reaching a total of €76,848 million, instead of €68,821 million recorded in 2011 and with respect to the Group’s earnings, its Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) rose by 3.5%, from €8,018 million in 2011 to €8,300 million (Appendix III). In this way, the Group’s net profit also achieved a record figure, as it reached the level of €5,122 million, which indicates an increase of 4.4% between 2011 and 2012 (Appendix I). The BMW Group seems to have high Gearing Ratio (over 50%), which means that the funds borrowed through bonds and loans outweigh the shareholders’ equity. Although, in general terms, this makes the company more vulnerable to downturns in its business cycle and as a result it is regarded more financial risky because of the possible danger that it may be unable to meet its interest payments out of its current earnings and cash flows, however it is normal for companies competing on this premium car industry to have high levels of gearing and still be profitable and efficient. This can be proven by the Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s agencies (Appendix II). In particular, the BMW Group enjoys ‘the best ratings of all European car manufacturers’ (BMW Group, 2013). In term of production and purchase of raw materials, supply costs play an im... ... middle of paper ... ..._lull.html (Accessed at: 25 Febraury 2014) • Nieger, c. (n.d) 5 future technologies that truly have a chance.[online]. Available at: http://auto.howstuffworks.com/under-the-hood/trends-innovations/5-future-car-technologies.htm#page=3 (Accessed at: 25 Febraury 2014) • Johnson, G., Whittington, R. and Scholes, K. (2011) Exploring Corporate Strategy. Ed.9. Prentice Hall. • Johnson, G. and Scholes, K. (2005) Exploring corporate strategy: text and cases. Ed.7. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall. • Waterman, R.J., Peters, T.J. and Phillips, J.R. (1980) Structure is not organization, Business Horizons, 23(3), pp.14-26. • Thurlby, B. (1998) Competitive forces are also subject to change, Management Decision, London. • Thomas, H. (2007) An analysis of the environment and competitive dynamics of management education, Journal of Management Development, 26(1), pp.9-21

Open Document