Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Speech on the dangers of smoking
Speech on the dangers of smoking
arguements for the smoking legislation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Speech on the dangers of smoking
If a new policy to develop a smoke free environment for the university is to be created, the policy must consider the following four important factors: bans on smoking, anti-smoking ads, public lectures, and the age of the spokespeople. Firstly, creating bans on smoking in the university premises may seem as a harsh strategy, especially to students who are highly addicted to smoking. This strategy can be implemented with the help of strict security personnel, who should ensure that any student caught smoking in the university is stopped. However, this is likely to cause student unrest since they may see the strategy as an infringement of their rights (Foleno, 1992). On the other hand, proper consultation and discussion with all the university’s students on the need to ban smoking totally in the institution may help in adhering to the new policy.
The second factor, anti-smoking ads, may also be of significant value to the new policy. Anti-smoking advertising can succeed in the long run only if there is clarity and consistency in the messages. Since most of the university students normally fail to pay attention to boring ads, anti-smoking ads should have captivating themes, which will attract the students to read the messages on the ads (Pechmann & Reibling, 2000). The messages should discuss the adverse negative effects of smoking such as lung cancer, smelly breath, and mouth cancer (Boyle, 2004). In addition, public lectures that focus on both the short and long-term effects of smoking can be incorporated into the policy. Such lectures are likely to enlighten students at the university on the health issues associated with smoking tobacco (Boyle, 2004). For the lectures to be taken seriously by the students, the people chosen to...
... middle of paper ...
...tegy 2004-2009. National Drug Strategy, 2, 85-109.
Pechmann, C., & Reibling, E. T. (2000). Anti-smoking advertising campaigns targeting youth: Case studies from USA and Canada. Tobacco Control, 9, ii18-ii31.
Puhl, R. (2013). Anti-obesity campaigns do not work. The Times of India. Retrieved from http://www.timesofindia.com/life-style/health-fitness/Anti-obesity-campaigns-do-not -work/articleshow/16397938.cms
Puhl, R., Peterson, J. L., & Luedicke, J. (2013). Fighting obesity or obese persons: Public perceptions of obesity-related health messages. International Journal of Obesity, 37, 774-782.
Rocha, C. M., Gomez-Arias, R. D., & Padron, G. J. (2011). International public health: Between old and new paradigms. Pan American Journal of Public Health, 30(2), 99-100.
Rosen, G. (1993). A history of public health. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
"Treating Obesity Vital For Public Health, Physicians Say." Science Daily. 2006. Web. 10 May 2014. .
Obesity is a rising problem in the United States. With obesity rates on the rise something must be done to prevent this massive issue. There are ways to help including educating at young ages, improving nutrition facts at restaurants, and providing more space for citizens to get physically active.
Obesity has been accepted in the American society as a norm. According to the U.S. office of the Surgeon General, in 1999, 6 in 10 American adults were classified as obese or overweight (McMurray, par. 5). In order for one to be classified as obese they’re body mass index (BMI) must be 30 or greater. The number of obese in America has continued to increase. It has been estimated by The World Health Organization that 300 million people will be obese by 2025 (Bailey 3). Since obesity comes with many health risks, many feel it should be treated as a disease.
Ambinder, Marc. "Beating Obesity." Atlantic Monthly Vol. 305, No. 4. May. 2010: 72+. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 04 Feb. 2014.
Obesity has increasingly become a significant public health concern in the United States. In the past four decades, the numbers of overweight children, adolescents, and adults has shot to high margins, and the rise cut cross all ages, races, and ethnicities for both males and females. A recent analysis by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey found that 30% of the American adult aged over the ages of twenty, which is a representation of over 60 million adults, was obese. Still the same survey indicated 16% of those between the ages of 16years and 19 years, which is over 9 million children and teenagers, were obese. This has come with its share of repe...
in only a few years time we will notice a drastic decline in the total
One hundred and forty-seven billion dollars. This is the estimated cost of obesity in the United States (CDC, 2013). Today, obesity is on trend to being one of the biggest public health challenges since tobacco (Perry & Creamer, 2013). In 2010 33.7% of US adults and 17% of children aged 2-19 were considered obese (CDC, 2013). While obesity is rising at an exponential rate, there is disconnect between how society views and defines obesity and the actual medical costs and future health risks the disease holds (ACSM, 2010). This is where medical professionals need to bridge the gap of medical and social construction.
Freedman, D. H. (2011). How to fix the obesity crisis. (Cover story). Scientific American, 304(2), 40-47.
It is shocking to know that there are about ten people who die from smoking every single minute, and nobody seems to have any idea about it. Indeed, there is “a growing gap between the real world and the academy” since people are more intellectual about things that are irrelevant to the real life and are ignorant of things that are imperative to live in the real world (Orr 310). Did you know that there are over four hundred thousand deaths caused by cigarettes and tobacco each year in the U.S. alone? That makes it about five million deaths worldwide each year, according to “Statistics about Smoking.” Smoking is notorious for causing avoidable diseases and deaths, and yet not many institutions have develop an appropriate system to prevent cigarette and tobacco from killing millions each year. For instance, all universities promote health and wellness and many claim to be substance-free, yet they do not restrict the selling of cigarettes and tobacco in campus stores or smoking on campus. People are dying, thousands are getting hooked, and a whole population is being affected, hence it‘s urgent that a university aims to educate students to combat smoking. The ideal student will learn the immediate and long-term affects of what cigarette can do to himself and others around him, to resist peer pressure, and be capable of recognizing and resisting advertisement and media ploys. In order to achieve this, the university must provide a curriculum that includes classes such as Anatomy, Smoking Biology with seminars, Media Effects, History of Smoking, Tobacco Industry 101, and DARE with community service.
Renneboog, R. M. (2016). Cigarette Smoking Bans: An Overview. Canadian Points Of View: Cigarette Smoking Bans, 1.
Obesity is a public health issue due to the complications it leads to later in life. Obese individuals are more susceptible in obtaining health problems such as heart disease, stroke, and diabetes, therefore have a higher risk of mortality (WHOgoogle). Yet not only is obesity a problem of the individual but of society as well. In 2008 US spent an estimated cost of $147 billion on medical cost of obesity, almost a 70 billion dollar increase since 1998(CDC). Both the detrimental health issues it leads a too and the excessive amount of cost it causes, obesity is epidemic that must be addressed.
In the recent years, an increased number of colleges and universities have been instituting campus-wide smoking bans, prohibiting smoking anywhere on college grounds. The goal of the campus smoking ban is to discourage smoking by young people, improve the health of the students and staff, who are otherwise forced to inhale toxic smoke, and provide an overall cleaner environment. In addition to the obvious health and environmental benefits, the much-needed smoking ban can financially benefit the institutions themselves!
Every year, there are over 400,000 smoking-related deaths in the United States. A large percentage of these are due to lung cancer, whose leading cause is smoking. However, not all deaths are smokers themselves. Anyone in the vicinity can fall victim to second hand smoke. These people, through no action of their own, can have their lives threatened.
Every cigarette you smoke reduces your expected life span by 11 minutes. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more deaths are caused each year by tobacco use than by all deaths from HIV, illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, suicides, and murders combined. The smoke-free college campuses is a step towards decreasing the use of these dangerous, habit forming products. Smoking causes harm to not just for smoker itself but it exposes other student to second hand smoke related health issues. Smoking ban helps to create a healthy learning environment to students, staffs and visitors.
“Approximately 20 percent of students begin smoking in college and another 50 percent intensify their smoking behavior” (“Smoking on College & University Campuses”). This shows greatly people are influenced at this time and the dangers of having a college campus where it is acceptable to smoke. If smokers don’t have an easily accessible place to smoke then they will be a lot less likely smoke especially since one of the most common types of smoking in college is social smoking. Social smoking is often thought of as not dangerous since it usually involves the smoker only smoking a few cigarettes in a day then they might not do it for a couple days or even weeks after. The dangers of this is people often aren’t aware of how easily they can become addicted and that they can actually become addicted within seconds of taking just one puff of a cigarette (“Social Smoking”). These smoking bans could turn out to be not just beneficial for students but for teachers as well, actually helping “to nudge more campus workers to snuff out the habit” (Stansbury). Along with the reduction of the pollution of the student’s bodies from smoking it will also help reduce the pollution on college