Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Karl Marx's view on religion
Karl marx view on religion critiques
Karl Marx's view on religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Karl Marx and Max Weber, as well as their theories, share many similarities. Both were German sociologists whose work spanned decades, and influence spanned even further. Marx and Weber also had much to say about the modern world economy, both delved into religion, and most obviously of all each of these men tried to answer the question of how civilization got to where it is, and where it would go from there.
The central tenet of most of Marx’s more prolific writings is labor, and the power and relations that come from it. Marx believes that all people act for selfish, material reasons. Man acts only in his self-interest. He labors because he needs wages to support himself and his family, not for any larger purpose, capitalists exploit labor because it is the only way to compete in a capitalist marketplace, it is not their fault, but the fault of the system. This is further supported by his ideas of alienation of labor. Marx defines as such:
The alienation of the worker in his product means not only that his labor becomes an object, an external existence, but that it exists outside him, independently, as something alien to him, and that it becomes a power of its own confronting him; it means that the life which he has conferred on the object confronts him as something hostile and alien. (Marx, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 72)
One of Marx’s ideas is that workers put worth more effort, and are happier; when they are laboring for something they can call their own. In the past one craftsman would work on a good from inception to completion, it would be the product of his labor alone. When the industrial revolution took off that all changed; now workers only completed one small step in the process, they co...
... middle of paper ...
...wer and Authority 21 November 2011. Lecture.
Marx, Karl. "Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844." The Marx-Engels Reader. Ed. Robert C. Tucker. 2nd. New York: W. W, Norton & Company, 1978. 66-125. Print.
Marx, Karl. "The Coming Upheaval." The Marx-Engels Reader. Ed. Robert C. Tucker. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1978.
Olsen, Eric. "Weber Essay." Essay. 2011. Document.
Weber, Max. "Class, Status, Party." Essays in Sociology. Trans. H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press, 1946. 180-195. Print.
—. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Trans. Talcott Parsons. New York: Dover Publications, 1958. Print.
Weber, Max. "The Types of Legitimate Domination." Weber, Max. The Theaory if Social and Economic Organization. Ed. Talcott Parsons. Trans. A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. New York: The Free Press, 1947. Print.
Since the worker’s product is owned by someone else, the worker regards this person, the capitalist, as alien and hostile. The worker feels alienated from and antagonistic toward the entire system of private property through which the capitalist appropriates both the objects of production for his own enrichment at the expense of the worker and the worker’s sense of identity and wholeness as a human being.
Karl Marx is one of the most influential socialists, economists, and philosophers to emerge in the 19th century. His work was largely ignored by the scholars of his lifetime, yet has gained rapid acceptance since his death in 1883. One of his greatest works includes the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 which introduces his central concepts of alienation labor. In this essay I will provide an interpretation of what I understand Marx’s account of alienated labor to be well as a critical evaluation of the material he provides.
(Marx 1) this job was real estate I was working in a very competitive office in Crown-Heights and every here and there they had meetings with the very wealthy building owners on what they should do to make thing better and by the looks of it they all became nastier the the next the look of peoples faces when they would do anything for money even though they have so much of it is remarkable. Another alienation I noticed was alienation of product Karl Marx mentions in his passage Alienated labor “That the product of labor does not belong to the worker” (Marx 6). I remember when I would do showings that I would make the unto look so amazing that I made it sound like it doesn’t even need a broker, it so happens to be that one time someone actually said “if this unit is so amazing why is there a brokers fee you could have sent me the keys and ill show it to myself” I don’t know what was worse the feeling of someone calling me useless or my boss and my trainee witnessing that, from that moment I learned something and that it that never make the cure for something make a treatment so you’re not used for a one time service you always make
During the nineteenth century, Karl Marx and Max Weber were two of the most influential sociologists. Both of them tried to explain social change taking place in a society at that time. On the one hand, their views are very different, but on the other hand, they had many similarities.
Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. "The Communist Manifesto." The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Ed. Vincent B. Leitch. New York: Norton, 2001. 769-773.
Karl Marx, the preface, “a Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy,” written 1859, Progress Publisher, Moscow, Translated by S. W. Ryazanskaya 1999
Marx’s idea of the estrangement of man from the product of his labor described the suffering of countless hours or work by the laborer, contributing to the production of a product that he could not afford with the wages he made. He helped to produce a product that only those wealthier than he could afford. As the society around him became more object-oriented, he became increasingly more alienated. In the lager, one factor that distanced the laborer from his product was that he no longer worked for a wage, but for survival. In a description of his fellow worker, Levi wrote, “He seems to think that his present situation is like outside, where it is honest and logical to work, as well as being of advantage, because according to what everyone says, the more one works the more one earns and eats.” Levi pitied his fellow worker for his naivety, as the Lager was not a place of labor for prosperity, but strictly a place of labor by force. One worked in order to live, focusing more on the uncertainty of their next meal, day, or even breath than the product of their l...
Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker. The Marx-Engels reader . 2d ed. New York: Norton, 1978. Print.
Marx’s theory of alienation describes the separation of things that naturally belong together. For Marx, alienation is experienced in four forms. These include alienation from ones self, alienation from the work process, alienation from the product and alienation from other people. Workers are alienated from themselves because they are forced to sell their labor for a wage. Workers are alienated from the process because they don’t own the means of production. Workers are alienated from the product because the product of labor belongs to the capitalists. Workers do not own what they produce. Workers are alienated from other people because in a capitalist economy workers see each other as competition for jobs. Thus for Marx, labor is simply a means to an end.
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. Trans. Paul M. Sweeny. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1998.
Karl Marx noted that society was highly stratified in that most of the individuals in society, those who worked the hardest, were also the ones who received the least from the benefits of their labor. In reaction to this observation, Karl Marx wrote The Communist Manifesto where he described a new society, a more perfect society, a communist society. Marx envisioned a society, in which all property is held in common, that is a society in which one individual did not receive more than another, but in which all individuals shared in the benefits of collective labor (Marx #11, p. 262). In order to accomplish such a task Marx needed to find a relationship between the individual and society that accounted for social change. For Marx such relationship was from the historical mode of production, through the exploits of wage labor, and thus the individual’s relationship to the mode of production (Marx #11, p. 256).
Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker. The Marx-Engels reader. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 1978. Print.
This theory of Marx's shared meanings relates somewhat to his theory on the division of labor in society. The ruling ideas that are brought upon in the capitalist mode are not natural, they are made up by the elite through what is being produced. The elite have plenty of time to think, they are left with doing the mental work. While the worker has no time to think because he is ...
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. "The German Ideology." The Marx-Engels Reader. Ed. Robert C. Tucker. New York: Norton, 1978. 146-200. Print
Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. "The Communist Manifesto." The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Ed. Vincent B. Leitch. New York: Norton, 2001. 769-773.