Writing Feminist Genealogy Analysis

510 Words2 Pages

Gilman had many ideas about how the world should be, and according to an article titled, Writing Feminist Genealogy: Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Racial Nationalism, and the Reproduction of Maternalist Feminism, written by Alys Eve Weinbaum, stated, that Gilman wanted a “pure national genealogy.” With Gilman’s “pure national genealogy” being “her belief in women’s reproductive role in crafting the proper (white) national genealogy…” (272). So, with this worldview of Gilman’s she argues that a woman’s work isn’t just in the home, she said that they should be “building a better society and ultimately reproducing a racially ‘pure’ nation” (Writing Feminist Genealogy: Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Racial Nationalism, and the Reproduction of Maternalist Feminism). Obviously, no one can make this “pure” nation that Gilman wanted but she still influenced many people …show more content…

According to Weinbaum, biographers have read it have said “the book’s ‘greatest disappointments is that it does not have the author’s heart in it’; ‘it has an unfinished quality’ and it is full of ‘self-deceptions’ and ‘purposeful misreading’s.’” A reason that she may not have put her whole heart into her autobiography, was that she was most likely in her depression at this point, she knew she had cancer and that it was spreading, and just a lust to be remembered and not thrown into obscurity or forgotten in the future. She wanted to make a difference, and she did, but the “want” to be remembered for all time over took her and the sickness of the cancer might have made her kind of shut down and just crank out an autobiography just for the memory of her after she was

Open Document