The SARA Model

2093 Words5 Pages

The Academic Justification (2300) The SARA Model will define the following section of the essay as the Assessment section, the purpose of this is to collect data to evaluate where the proposed response had a beneficial effect and illuminated the problem at hand (Greene, 2007). Both prevention strategies proposed, incorporates a range of ideas from Situation Prevention; the aim of all theories under Situational Prevention is to, reduce or remove the opportunity to commit an offence and amend criminogenic environments. Situational Prevention targets certain places and present physical modifications to the environments to design out crimes (Greene, 2007). Situational Prevention as been criticised being simplistic, as it does not examine other …show more content…

Crime is not a random act, although it may be rationally acted upon, the right situation has to present its self for it to be committed. Tilley (2009) suggests that crime is committed within the everyday routine of an attentive offender; these routines must have targets that are suitable for the offender. There are three concepts within in Crime Pattern, nodes, paths and edges; the routine that an individual's task to conduct daily activities, such as school, work, shopping, time with friends and entertainment (Brantingham & Brantingham, 1993a, 1993b, 2008; Tilley, 2009). The routes that people take everyday to get to this location are the paths, the geographical distribution of crime is generated by looking at an everyday crime map of paths that link commuter to targets, these paths cause them to become a victim (Clarke & Felson, 1998). As these paths are travelled often, it provides individuals with a good spatial awareness of suitable targets (Tilley, 2009). Edges are the boundaries where the nodes and paths run, crimes occur in these areas because different individuals from different neighbourhoods cross these zones; types of crimes include, racial attacks, assaults, robberies and shoplifting (Clarke & Felson, 1998). Bowers & Johnson (2003) Interviewed offenders and found that they committed offences closers to home because of comfort and familiarity, even though there were suitable targets

Open Document