The Only Begotten Son Of God Analysis

1979 Words4 Pages

7. What are Wolterstorff’s arguments for God being everlasting rather than eternal? Nicholas Wolterstorff debated God could not be “The One” charged with the duty of restoring the rights of another and avenging their wrongs (Lev. 25:48, 49; Num. 5:8; Ruth 4:1; Job 19:25; Ps. 19:14; 78:35, etc.). This title was given to The Only One named Jesus Christ, The Saviour of mankind, Who sacrificed His own life to redeem mankind from the bondage and guilt of their sins, Who redeemed Israel from Babylonian where He was exiled, Isa 41:14. The “Redeemer” is a quality that is distinctive of a particular person, a title given to The Only Begotten Son of God in the second part of Isaiah, because He must be able to make or become different. Wolterstorff then took the stance that God changes based on the biblical proof in Malachi 3:6; John 8:58; James 1:17, in chapter …show more content…

Why? Davis was vague in his writing, only discussing the options. Russell’s submission was completely inaccurate due to the fact that his opinions does not align itself with the Word of God. I found it quite challenging to follow Geach’s perspective that the only possibility for life after death is found in the hope of a resurrection to come which presents the most for life after death argument. What do you see as the crucial issued/question in regard to this question? The fear of the unknown is one of the most crucial issues about life after death. For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind, 2 Timothy 1:7. The scripture is our surety that those who accept Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior then we will receive the gift of everlasting life according to John 3:16. The Abrahamic teaching of the resurrection is the foundation of the Christianity; And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith, I Corinthians 15:14.

Open Document