Subjectivism, Relativism and Objectivism

583 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Subjectivism essay

Within the study of ethics, the principle of subjectivism maintains there are no immutable truths. Founded on an individual’s limited experience, personal rulings are arbitrary statements that reveal one’s attitudes, opinions and emotions not facts. Therefore, in order for a statement to be considered ethically or morally correct, it merely has to be approved by the person n question. By way of further explanation, ethical subjectivism can be said to begin with personal experience of the world and end with generalizations that enable an individual or assembly to render judgments about the world.
Though many individuals claim they are not ethical subjectivists, their statements and conduct often prove otherwise. For instance, consider the following, relatively common conversation between two students when one is heard saying, “History is the most interesting subject.” Indeed, their statement can be rephrased to say, “I find history to be the most interesting subject.” When the second student states, “History is boring. Astronomy is truly the most interesting of subjects,” their asser...

Show More
Related

  • Quiz Show by Robert Redford

    1538 Words  | 4 Pages

    Ethics are the principles that shape individual lives in modern society. It is a subjective idea that seems to have a standard in society. Ethics and morals are the major factors that guide individuals to make right and wrong choices. Something that is morally right to one person might be the very opposite of what another person would view as right. There are many factors that can trigger a change in an individual’s view of morality.

    Read More

  • Simple Subjectivism and Serial Killers

    1018 Words  | 3 Pages

    Subjectivism in simplest terms is the belief that moral judgments are simply individual expressions of feeling. Subjectivists believe that there are no objective moral truths; they believe that moral truths are only statements that represent how the proponent feels on a particular issue. Therefore, a subjectivist would focus more on Price’s intentions of com...

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism and the Case for Euthanasia

    1362 Words  | 3 Pages

    "BBC - Ethics - Introduction to ethics: Subjectivism." BBC - Homepage. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 Mar. 2014.

    Read More

  • Lewis Vaughn's Definition Of Ethics And Morality

    1159 Words  | 3 Pages

    Morality is, in many ways, a thorn in philosophy’s foot, struggling to abide by the standard of intellectual rigor typically held in the philosophical tradition. This is not particularly surprising. There is a high emotional and personal investment placed in morality and as such, even great minds can falter in their logical demands of morality. The issue of objectivism in ethics is particularly problematic. Lewis Vaughn’s arguments against ethical relativism in Bioethics show the difficulty of dismissing said theory’s possibility, all the while failing to provide his own evidence on behalf of ethical objectivism.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's The Quinlan Case

    1386 Words  | 3 Pages

    What is ethics? Ethics are the philosophical principles of good verses bad moral behavior. It is a guideline to help people make decisions or make a judgment calls. There are two main types of ethical principles that will be discussed in this paper, and how they are applied to the decision making process. They are Deontological and Utilitarian. Deontological ethics are based on the righteousness or wrongness of the action-taking place. It does not base itself on the bad or good consequences that come from the action. Immanuel Kant introduced deontological ethics in the 18th century. Kant believed that every decision or action made by a person had to be evaluated by his or her moral duty. He stated that humanity shouldn’t side on its

    Read More

  • Emmanuel Kant's Deontology: The True Definition Of Ethics

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is hard to pinpoint the true definition of ethics. Although it could be defined, in simple terms, as what the society approves of right and wrong, defining ethics as simple as that is “unethical”. In fact, since centuries, several philosophers have disputed with the definition of ethics and several have come up with their own philosophical ideas of ethics. But, for the time-being, the definition of ethics can be expanded to “well-founded standards of right or wrong that prescribe what humans ought to do, usually in terms of rights, obligations, benefits to society, fairness, or specific virtues” (Velasquez et. al). Because the definition of ethics is so confusing and conflicting, at times, it arose to a branch of ethics that investigates

    Read More

  • My Meta-ethical Position

    418 Words  | 1 Pages

    Subjectivism is the idea that there no ethical facts that ethical statements are not saying what "is" the case only what "ought" to be the case.

    Read More

  • Moral Objectivism Vs Moral Relativism

    1352 Words  | 3 Pages

    In ones adolescent years, an important figure or role model taught the values of morality, the importance between right and wrong and the qualities of good versus bad. As the years, decades, and centuries have passed by, the culture of morality and the principles that humankind lives by have shifted and changed over time. In the article, “Folk Moral Relativism”, the authors, Hagop Sarkissian, John Park, David Tien, Jennifer Cole Wright and Joshua Knobe discuss six different studies to support their new hypothesis. However, in order to understand this essay, one must comprehend the difference between moral objectivism and moral relativism, which is based on whether or not the view of what someone else believes in, is morally correct or incorrect. For instance, moral objectivism is not centered on a person’s beliefs of what is considered right and wrong, but instead, is founded on moral facts.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Relativism

    1357 Words  | 3 Pages

    Is there really a right from wrong? According to the rules of relativism, no one in specific can be absolutely correct about what is good or bad, but instead everyone is correct. Relativism views that it's all up to the individual or culture; that is the customs, arts, and/or social norms of a particular nation or social group. The reason why everyone is correct, as relativism mentions, is because there may be certain things a culture finds appropriate, but another may not. Some may say that there is a right from wrong, or that there is a certain fundamental moral principles that everyone has and obliges by, but in the end, everyone has different opinions about what is true or right and what is not.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism

    1353 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ethics can be defined as "the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs with the aim of improving, extending or refining those beliefs in some way." (Dodds, Lecture 2) Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism are two theories that attempt to answer the ethical nature of human beings. This paper will attempt to explain how and why Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism differ as well as discuss why I believe Kant's theory provides a more plausible account of ethics.

    Read More

  • Character Analysis: Sara Crewe

    1921 Words  | 4 Pages

    Velasquez, Manuel, Claire Andre,et al. "What Is Ethics?" Santa Clara University - Welcome. Web. 11 May 2010. .

    Read More

  • The Challenge Of Cultural Relativism By James Rachels

    1031 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his essay, “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism,” James Rachels argues that cultural relativism is an unsatisfactory moral theory because it is based upon an invalid argument, if cultural relativism were true, this would have some troubling and implausible consequences, and there are some moral rules common to all societies. In this short paper, I will argue that moral objectivism is a more satisfactory moral theory than ethical relativism.

    Read More

  • Ethics And Ethical Systems

    1378 Words  | 3 Pages

    As a function, ethics is a philosophical study of the moral value of human conduct, and of the rules and principles it should govern. As a system, ethics are a social, religious, or civil code of behavior considered correct by a particular group, profession, or individual. As an instrument, ethics provide perspective regarding the moral fitness of a decision, course of action, or potential outcomes. Ethical decision-making can include many types, including deontological (duty), consequentialism (including utilitarianism), and virtue ethics. Additionally, subsets of relativism, objectivism, and pluralism seek to understand the impact of moral diversity on a human level. Although distinct differences separate these ethical systems, organizations

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Ethical Theory: The Philosophical Study Of Morality

    1964 Words  | 4 Pages

    A system of rules organized an association of people to establish a society. These rules enhance the lives of people to get organized and progress. One of the rules is the rule of conduct which ought the people to do or ought not to do depends on the situation. These rules constitute a phenomenon of Morality. The philosophical study of morality is an ethics which are rational and systematic analysis of conduct that can be a source of benefit or harm to other people. The predominant focus of an ethics is based on the voluntary and moral choices of the people. In the past era, philosopher proposed many ethical theories. The ethical theory which fails to enable the user to make persuasive arguments in front of the diverse audience is a non-working

    Read More

  • What is Ethics and the Background behind Ethics

    1167 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ethics define a broad meaning on the subject itself. Baumhart,R (1987) states that ethics can be separated into 2 things. Firstly, it could be identified as a great level of right or wrong which can relates to the actions of p...

    Read More

More about Subjectivism, Relativism and Objectivism

Open Document