Shooting An Elephant Analysis

829 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Shooting an elephant by George Orwell critical analysis

Imperialism is the main idea in "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell. Upon first read, it may be unknown how the story represents imperialism, but with some background information it becomes clear. Eric Blair, pen name George Orwell, was employed by the indian police as an assistant superintendent in Burma in 1922 through empirical rule; which is what “shooting an Elephant” is based on. Out of all his successful writings, “Shooting an Elephant” was the story where he took a stance against imperialism and everything that he has worked his whole life. During this time, they had taken over many countries seeing it as the “white man’s burden” to civilize non- european people. George Orwell shows his opposition to to imperialism in “shooting an elephant” by using an elephant to represent one side of imperialism and the british soldiers to represent the other half. All of which is evil.
Orwell picks an elephant to represent the british empire for a few reasons. one reason is because of the size of the elephant, its huge just like the empire. Two would be the effect of the elephant on burma. also, the author describes the elephant being evil, dirty, huddling, stinky, scared, and intolerable (Orwell 788) which are all words used to describe the british empire with their superior beliefs. To show the connection from the elephant to the british empire he uses the explanation of the death of the indian to show the terror that the elephant caused but also the terror that the british empire caused. “He was lying on his belly, with arms crucified and head sharply twisted to one side. His face was coated with mud, the eyes wide open, the teeth bared and grinning with an expression of unendurable agony.” (Orwell 788) The connection between th...

... middle of paper ...

...an elephant for killing a coolie because an elephant was worth more than any damn Coringhee coolie” showing that not only do they think its a shame to kill an elephant, but they are describing the indian as less human than the elephant. None of the officers were present when the main character had decided to shoot the elephant and didn’t see that he was going to make a fool of himself. The shot to the elephant was the end of imperialism in the story and that the narrative was just a puppet of the Burmese by the end.

Orwell really helps us grasp how evil imperialism is. By creating a comparison between the elephant and the british empire it shows the inevitable downfall of the british empire. Just like the elephant, the rule in Burmese ended in fatality. When the elephant was shot, it showed the shift in power in Burmese and thus, the breakdown of imperialism.

Show More
Related

  • Shooting An Elephant Rhetorical Analysis

    484 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Orwell’s reflective narrative, “Shooting an Elephant”, he reveals the truth on imperialism. Through the utilization of irony and the method of appeals, Orwell shows the reader that imperialism is just a definition because the people are in control, not Britain.

    Read More

  • Metaphor In Shooting An Elephant

    763 Words  | 2 Pages

    George Orwell is a novel writer, born in India and have only spent five days there. Ida Mabel Limouzin, his mother, brought him and his sister too England while his father stayed in India. The novel Shooting an Elephant, that George wrote, took place in the bottom of Burma in the middle of Moulmein. The story is about George Orwell hesitating to kill an Elephant that has killed a man. All George planned to do was to test the elephant to see if it really meant any harm. George feels pressured by the crowd following him because they expect him to kill the elephant. He eventually made the decision to kill the elephant to make the mad crowd happy and plus he doesn’t want to fail at doing his job. Throughout the story George Orwell exert many Metaphor

    Read More

  • True Power in "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell

    1473 Words  | 3 Pages

    The quest for power is one which has been etched into the minds of men throughout history. However, it can be said that true power is not a result of one’s actions but comes from the following one’s own beliefs without being influenced by others. This principle sets up the story for Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell. The protagonist, Orwell himself, is a sub divisional police officer in Burma, a British colony. Orwell must try to find and use his inner power when he is faced with the decision of whether or not to kill an elephant which has ravaged the Burman’s homes. The state of power established through the imperialistic backdrop show that Orwell, as a colonist, should be in control. As well, the perspective and ideas given by Orwell show his true character and lessen the overall power set up for him. Lastly, the symbols shown are representations of traditional forms of power, but take on different implications in the story. In Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell uses setting, characterization and symbols to show that true power comes from following the dictates of one’s conscience.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the essay, “Shooting an Elephant”, George Orwell retells his experiences and feelings of being disrespected as a sub-divisional police officer in Moulmein, Burma. Early one morning, In the lower part of Burma, an elephant was reported ravaging the bazaar. As Orwell’s curiosity persuades him to go investigate the elephant, the author sees the damage that the elephant left behind. He prepares out of fear to “murder” the elephant with an elephant rifle. In doing this he excited the Burmese, who led a crowd behind Orwell, encouraging him to shoot the elephant who was now no more harmless than a cow. Orwell’s diction and actions, shows a complex tone towards the natives through his loyalties, his use of racist slurs, and his struggle with power and control.

    Read More

  • Shooting An Elephant Analysis

    801 Words  | 2 Pages

    The essay “Shooting an Elephant,” was written by George Orwell. Orwell was a British author best known for his essays and novels. In “Shooting an Elephant,” the title essay of his 1950 collection, Orwell is a British Police Officer in Lower Burma. After an elephant comes rampaging through the village in must, killing an Indian man, Orwell is looked upon to take care of the problem. The intense scene causes Orwell to make a crucial decision, reflecting on the vicious imperialism with the military in Burma during this time. The author portrays his feelings through the theme of the narrative with feelings such as, guilt, hate, and pressured.

    Read More

  • Shooting an Elephant

    422 Words  | 1 Pages

    A police officer in the British Raj, the supposedly 'unbreakable'; ruling force, was afraid. With his gun aimed at a elephant's head, he was faced with the decision to pull the trigger. That officer was George Orwell, and he writes about his experience in his short story, 'Shooting an Elephant';. To save face, he shrugged it off as his desire to 'avoid looking the fool'; (George Orwell, 283). In truth, the atmosphere of fear and pressure overwhelmed him. His inner struggle over the guilt of being involved in the subjugation of a people added to this strain, and he made a decision he would later regret enough to write this story.

    Read More

  • Comparing David Thoreau And John Steinbeck's The Grapes Of Wrath

    1771 Words  | 4 Pages

    He illustrates the effects that imperialism can cause on a society. He creates an abominable diction through words such as “hatred,” “rage,” “evil,” which are feelings that according to Orwell “are normal by products of imperialism.” (Orwell, 1101) Through his diction he appeals to pathos as he creates a feeling of appalment among his audience. Orwell utilizes the appeal to ethos as he recounts the shooting of an elephant, which becomes a metaphor for imperialism. Orwell claims that this event “was enlightening” (Orwell, 1101) as it allowed him to understand the nature for which humans take some of the actions they carry. During the event of the elephant on the loose in the streets of Burma, Orwell uses the rhetorical device of imagery to describe the crowd of “yellow faces” who demonstrated enthusiasm for the killing of the elephant. As Orwell contemplates the action point of shooting the elephant he realized that he would “have to shoot the elephant after all” (Orwell 1103) since the people expected him to do so. “two thousand people marching at my heels, and then to trail feebly away, having done nothing- no that was impossible.”(Orwell, 1103) Like Thoreau had stated, the

    Read More

  • Imperialism In The Martian Chronicles By Ray Bradbury

    674 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another passage is Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell; the narrator makes the elephant represent imperialists. The natives would abuse the officer because he was European and they made Burma a colony, the officer can represent the country itself and the civilians abusing him can represent the countries opinion towards imperialism. The office than sees a elephant which can represent the imperialists, running around the village and destroying everything. He then shoots down the elephant, which he was struggling on making a decision for, but the people were chanting for him too. He then killed the elephant and by the next the villagers took everything from the elephant besides the bones. This can relate to how the imperialists “run” around and destroy everything and the people just want it gone, and once its gone they take everything. The narrator says “for a mad elephant has to be killed, like a mad dog, if its owner fails to control it”, which can mean when the imperialists

    Read More

  • Shooting An Elephant Rhetorical Analysis

    609 Words  | 2 Pages

    In “Shooting an Elephant” much more happens than solely the shooting of an elephant. George Orwell depicts the murder scene of an elephant in Burma and precisely describes the events that led to its demise. Orwell uses various rhetorical techniques to instill the emotion felt in the moment of slaughter. Through the descriptions of the impending crowd and the crushing end of a majestical beast, Orwell appeals to the reader’s pathos. With these emotionally trying tales, Orwell excels at winning the reader over to the idea that imperialism has a massively negative influence on the oppressed and the oppressors. Orwell uses the rhetorical strategies irony, simile, and extended metaphor to convey his message to the reader.

    Read More

  • The Use of Metaphors in Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the essay ?Shooting an Elephant? by George Orwell, the author uses metaphors to represent his feelings on imperialism, the internal conflict between his personal morals, and his duty to his country. Orwell demonstrates his perspectives and feelings about imperialism.and its effects on his duty to the white man?s reputation. He seemingly blends his opinions and subjects into one, making the style of this essay generally very simple but also keeps it strong enough to merit numerous interpretations. Orwell expresses his conflicting views regarding imperialism throughout the essay by using three examples of oppression and by deliberatly using his introspection on imperialism.

    Read More

  • How Does Orwell Create Tension In Shooting An Elephant

    121 Words  | 1 Pages

    In “Shooting an Elephant” writer George Orwell illustrates the terrible episode that explains more than just the action of “shooting an elephant.” Orwell describes the scene of the killing of an elephant in Burma and reveals a number of emotions he experienced during the short, but traumatic event. Effectively, the writer uses many literary techniques to plant emotions and create tension in this scene, leading to an ironic presentation of imperialism. With each of the realistic descriptions of the observing multitude and the concrete appeal of the narrator’s pathos, Orwell thrives in persuading the audience that imperialism not only has a destructive impact on those being governed under the imperialists’ oppressive power, but also corrupts

    Read More

  • Orwell and Colonialism

    541 Words  | 2 Pages

    I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool." So ends George Orwell's poignant reminiscence of an incident representing the imperialist British in Burma. Unlike Soyinka, who wrote about colonialism from the African's point of view, Orwell, like Joseph Conrad in Heart of Darkness, presents the moral dilemmas of the imperialist. Orwell served with the Imperialist Police in Burma while it was still part of the British Commonwealth and Empire. His service from 1922 to 1927 burdened himwith a sense of guilt about British colonialism as well a need to make some personal expiation for it (Norton 2259). "Shooting an Elephant" chronicles an incident in which Orwell confronts a moral dilemma and abandons his morals to escape the mockery of the native Burmans. He repeatedly shoots and kills an elephant which had ravaged a bazaar and scared many Burmans even though "As soon as I saw the elephant I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him" (6).

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Shooting An Elephant And George Orwell

    1121 Words  | 3 Pages

    When he finial find the elephant Orwell say “I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him.” But when he lays his eyes on the crowd he changes his stance to “but I did not want to shoot the elephant.”(Orwell 199). He felt guilty for shooting the elephant when he describe that the elephant worth more alive than dead, but despite the many reason not to shoot the elephant, he took a shot. Orwell describes “when I pulled the trigger I did not hear the bang or feel the kick …I fired again into the same spot…I fired a third time. That was the shot that did it for him.”(199) the shooting of the elephant represent the Burma people trying to stay alive and over powering by the

    Read More

  • Conflict In Shooting An Elephant

    784 Words  | 2 Pages

    The character, himself, is part of the British rule and is supposed to have all of the power. The Burmese, though, dangle the power in front of him. He is weak and unsure of himself, stating that he “wears a mask, and his face grows to fit it” (60). The character is not able to stand up for what he believes in -- that is, not shooting the elephant. There is a back and forth struggle in his mind about whether or not the elephant needs to be killed. Orwell’s character is fully aware that it is wrong and immoral to shoot an innocent creature, but eventually secedes to the demands of the Burmese, attempting to prove his cooperation and loyalty to those watching. In a way, the Burmese represent the pressures of society. Because of this, the audience can sympathize with the main character. There are always times when we, the readers, are unsure of ourselves, but we eventually make a decision. Whether we make the decision for ourselves or are assisted by others, in the end, we must take responsibility for our own actions. In a broader sense, Orwell’s character represents the internal conflict that everyone faces: should we conform to society or should we be our own

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis of Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell

    848 Words  | 2 Pages

    "Shooting an Elephant" is perhaps one of the most anthologized essays in the English language. It is a splendid essay and a terrific model for a theme of narration. The point of the story happens very much in our normal life, in fact everyday. People do crazy and sometimes illegal moves to get a certain group or person to finally give them respect. George Orwell describes an internal conflict between his personal morals and his duty to his country to the white man's reputation. The author's purpose is to explain the audience (who is both English and Burmese) about the kind of life he is living in Burma, about the conditions, circumstances he is facing and to tell the British Empire what he think about their imperialism and his growing displeasure for the imperial domination of British Empire.

    Read More

More about Shooting An Elephant Analysis

Open Document