Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alternative methods in animal testing
Controversy of animal testing
Controversial topic on animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I. INTRODUCTION A. Attention/Device & Rapport Building Raise your hand if you have any of these products in your household (visual). Raise your hand if you knew that in order for these brands to shelve their items, this is what they must do to animals in the name of safety (visual). B. Preview-Partition Statement Every year, over 100 million animals are killed for experimentation, biology lessons, medical/military training, and cosmetic, drug, and chemical testing. Animals are tortured all over the world and still lack lawful protection. (Transition: ) II. BODY (try to keep your ideas to three major points to stay within time limits) A. Animal testing is cruelty. 1. Animals used in testing are subjected to constant torture. a. …show more content…
Humans and animals aren’t exactly the same, so why should we be using them? a. the fda reports that 92 our of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans b. Human based subjects are more reliable than animal tests 3. In vitro a. synthetic skin b.Based off of human cells and tissue cultures c. replicates the traits of bunnies, rats, or guinea pigs to determine if the product will corrode the skin 4. Computer modeling simulates the human body to predict the way drugs will react 5. Human simulators (med students) they can breathe, talk, bleed, and die replicate the anatomy of a human 4. Animal friendly testing is cost effective and environmentally friendly a. Testing time is expedited b. when it comes to toxicity they need to breed, test, and dispose animals as hazardous waste (Transition: Let’s summarize.) III. CONCLUSION A. Review/Summary 1. Why test on animals if only humans will use it? 2. Animal testing is unnecessary, cruel, and wasteful. Since they do not have the power to protect themselves, so we have to. B. Clincher/Attention Device 1. the only thing we can do is support charities that do not support animal testing and invest in cruelty free products. 3. If this isn’t okay (visual), why is this
Every year over 100 million animals die in the US; the cause for these deaths, animal testing. This injustice to animals involves testing products such as medical drugs or makeup, on poor imprisoned animals that don’t have the ability to stand for their own rights as most of us do. Animals used for testing are given products that may result in burning, poisoning, or death. These animals are forced to live in confined spaces where they wait until the next horrible experiment. They are, tortured beyond imagination as they are sometimes even cut open while they are alive (know as vivisection), either with expired analgesics or even without them.
According to Marna Owen, from "Animal Rights; Yes or No? claims that each year 80,000 animals are used and often killed for the sake of medical research. He describes experiments in which puppies are burned, cats eyelids are sewn shut, and baboon's heads are crushed. A fiery debate arised and according to the book 6 people chained themselves to the psychol...
The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past thirty years. Animal testing is a morally debated practice. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong. This paper will present both sides of this issue as well as my own opinion.
Every year thousands of animals are euthanized due to animal testing such as cosmetic testing, medical testing, and dissection. (A Critical Look at Animal Experimentation) (Types of Animal Testing) Some of the things we use every day such as; make up, soap, furniture polish, and varieties of cleaning supplies, are tested on rabbits, guinea pigs, dogs, cats, and other animals. (Animal Testing) Cosmetic testing is used to test a product and its ingredients, medical testing finds cures for different illnesses; and dissection is used to help high school students in science classes have a better understanding of the class or students undergoing the medical field in college. (Animal Experimentation) Animal testing is not required by law; it is only used to protect companies from consumer lawsuits, provided new research for diseases, and provide a visual learning experiment for students. (A Critical Look at Animal Experimentation) It has been proven that there are more reliable and less expensive alternatives to animal testing, such as; computer models and cell and tissue tests. Animal experimentation should be eliminated because it is an inhumane method for testing purposes.
Animals are used as a part of experimentations in order to accomplish new openings. A few individuals think that it is satisfactory, while others contend that it is not moral to sacrifice animals for science. Estimated, that fifty to one hundred million of animals are used for tests in the world. Despite the significance of experiments, the quantity of animals and purpose of research are not under any control. Animals testing should be banned under a few circumstances; we can enhance the situation by using alternative ways such as replacement, reduction, and refinement according to International Society for Applied Ethology.
Hurting an animal is better than hurting a fellow human being right? Well imagine a child being ripped away from his mother in today’s society, for no reason. Would that be considered okay, or kidnapping? Imagine humans being forced to breed, just so their children can be tortured for makeup or a new facial wash. Would that be considered okay, or morally incorrect? People do not see animals as fellow living things, because they do not have the power to say no like a person can. They can’t stand up for themselves, leaving the people of the world to do it for them. Seeing that there are other ways to test out consumer products, why harm defenseless, breathing, loving, beings? With all things considered, animal testing “has no place in science today” (Goodall, 1).
This is just one of the countless barbaric tortures forced upon animals. Studies show that in 1994, over 3,500 animals were killed in the United Kingdom, with almost another 21,000 more used in France for cosmetic purposes only (Celebrities, 95). These numbers reflect totals in only two countries. Research by Congress estimates that as many as 22 million animals are used annually for experimental research (Testing, 96). This research is funded by over $5 billion in tax revenue (Bio-Med, 97).
The issue of animal testing needs to be addressed because the horrible conditions and treatments theses animals are put through are inhumane. The humane society states, “Animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding,
The abuse that animals endure at human hands is heartbreaking, sickening, and infuriating. Animals are just as delicate as humans, so why not abuse us too? Animal lives should be just important as ours. No animals should be killed or abused for testing, entertaining, clothing, or hoarding. Every year, millions of animals are being killed and torture for testing.
middle of paper ... ... In conclusion animal tests for the same products but different companies putting more than one animal at risk, these tests can be stopped if the government stops allowing large companies to put these animals at risk simple household products these animals are living beings with feelings and emotions and deserve to live a long and happy life like any human being. Animal Cruelty Prevention Act tries to stop animal cruelty and experiments but the commercial companies tend to get away with it because they find loopholes and they are very wealthy. They also save millions of dollars by experimenting on animals and not using the slightly costlier alternatives such as cell cultures, corneal and skin tissue cultures, corneas from eye banks, and computer and mathematical models.
Evils deemed “necessary” throughout history have been overturned and replaced upon investigation and critical analysis. If atrocious institutions were never questioned, societal progress would have been delayed and matters would look drastically different today. The practice of animal exploitation is worthy of intense scrutiny and is by no means necessary, not any longer, at least given the growing efforts to find alternative methods of testing or researching products. Some believe that alternatives to animal testing are ineffective, only in infancy or not to be considered as legitimate options. This is only because corporations are reluctant and even unwilling to put funds and efforts toward transitioning from cruel to cruelty-free. The unwillingness is thinly veiled greed and ignorance toward understanding the ramifications of mistreatment of living beings on the environment. There are companies that have already found success transitioning to cruelty-free and ecologically sound practices. Mindful companies are more likely to produce quality goods with the consumer’s best interest in mind. Investment in alternatives would be beneficial to the victimized animals, the environment, and the consumers that would no longer be complicit in unethical practices and could have a greater number of humane
Penicillin, a vital antibiotic for infection is toxic to ginea pigs. Animal testing isn’t reliable option for human medication or products. Animals have different genetic make up than humans. Mike Leavitt, The Health and Human Service Secretary, states “ Nine out of ten experimental drug fail in clinical studies because we cannot accurately predict how they will behave in people based on laboratory and animal studies.” (Animal Research is Unethical and Scientifically Unnecessary). Humans have obvious differenced than animals like physiology and anatomy. These differences are the reason drug testing on animals isn’t equal when medication or product is used in a human trial. Pfizer reported in 2004 that they “wasted more than $2 billion over the past decade on drugs that “failed in advanced human testing or, in a few instances, were forced off the market, because of liver toxicity problems” (Animal Research is Unethical and Scientifically Unnecessary). Some drugs have caused serious and unexpected health problems even after they were tested on animals. Animal
(Main Point # 1) Cruel and inhumane practices are used on animals to test products that we use everyday.
Every year, thousands of animals are tormented, and then die during the animal experiments. Another fact is from Vivisection Information Network, there is a rough estimate from the European Union that 10.5 million vertebrate animals were used in animal experiments, which is 28,800 per day or one every three seconds. Around 18.5 million animals were used in the USA per year (Updated). Also, there are still a large amount of animals that have not been registered. Even though there are disadvantages and disagreement in using of animal experiment, there is also some evidences show that animal experiment is inevitable for the future progress, and the human beings would not have greater life quality without animal testing.
If animal testing continues to be a legal source of research for products and medications, many animals will continue to die cruel and unusual deaths with little benefit to humanity. Animal testing should be ruled illegal. These animals are forced to live in science labs under inhumane circumstances for the testing of products which rarely ending up being used for humans and could have been measured for safety by using alternative methods to animal testing. Animals are important to humans for companionship, rehabilitation, and quite necessarily depended on for sustenance. Treating animals with little compassion in a sterile testing center defies the ethics of humanity and degrades our presence as an intelligent species making us no better than the animals we experiment on.