Joint venture and M&A are an integral part of business. Love them or hate them, you cannot just ignore them. Be it, oil, telecom, education or the food sector, or be it Reliance (RIL and RPL), Tata’s (Tata and CMC), Pfizer (Pfizer and Pharmacia), AOL Warner (AOL and Time Warner), Joint ventures and M&A’s have brought new life to the style of doing business in today’s world. Mergers, acquisitions, takeovers and joint ventures are members of the amalgamation family. One reason that companies often choose to expand is to merge with another company, to take over another company, or form a new company altogether (JV) .A merger is where two companies come together as one company – may be with a new name of the parent company, losing their independent identities. A takeover means that one company buys out the other company. And joint venture is when a new company is born with the parent companies in existence. Amalgamation is the merger of two or more companies with another existing company, or the merger of two or more companies to form a new company. In India, amalgamation as per the Co...
MCC decided to spend class 4 working together on an Agenda. We broke out into groups and discussed the elements of a JV then prepared a high-level agenda.
In other words, when two firms link to form a new firm, it is called a merger; whereas, when one company buys the other company wherein no new company formation happens it is called acquisition . Technically, coalitions transpire amid two comparable sized companies. Stocks for both the firms are presented and new company’s stocks are issued. For example, when Chrysler and Daimler-Benz merged, a new company called DaimlerChrysler was created. On the contrary, when a purchase happens and the buyer ‘swallows’ the target firm wherein it ceases to tolerate is called an acquisition. How a deal is uttered and whether the buy is hostile or approachable is what determines whether it is trusted as a coalition or an acquisition.
A merger is a partial or total combination of two separate business firms and forming of a new one. There are predominantly two kinds of mergers: partial and complete. Partial merger usually involves the combination of joint ventures and inter-corporate stock purchases. Complete mergers are results in blending of identities and the creation of a single succeeding firm. (Hicks, 2012, p 491). Mergers in the healthcare sector, particularly horizontal hospital mergers wherein two or more hospitals merge into a single corporation, are increasing both in frequency and importance. (Gaughan, 2002). This paper is an attempt to study the impact of the merger of two competing healthcare organization and will also attempt to propose appropriate clinical and managerial interventions.
Joint Venture is “a partnership, individual, or corporation that pools labor and capital for a limited period of time” (Kubasek, Brennan, Browne, 2015, p. 431). This method can increase liability and limit outside opportunities where the business can not expand their product line and have to utilize the products provided by the company they have a joint in a agreement. The mission of the coffeehouse is to be unique and special. This type of model would not allow originality and for that reason, its not recommend that Shania get involved with a joint venture.
It is proper to present a business definition of merger as it found on legal reference with the ultimate goal in the pursuing of an explanation on which this paper intents to present. A merger in accordance with the textbook is legally defined as a contractual and statuary process in which the (surviving corporation) acquires all the assets and liabilities of another corporation (the merged corporation). The definition go even farther to involve and clarify about what happen to shares by explaining the following; “the shareholders of the merged corporation either are paid for their share or receive the shares of the surviving corporation”. But in simple terms is my attempt to define as the product or birth of a corporation on which typically extends its operation by combining with another corporation. So from two on existence corporations in the process it gets absorbed into becomes one entity. The legal definition also implied more than meet the eye. The terms contractual and statuary, it implied a process on which contracts and statuary measures emerge as measures to regulate, standardized, governing or simply at times may complicate whole process. These terms provide an explicit umbrella and it becomes as part of the agreement formulating or promoting a case for contracts to be precedent, enforced or regulated in a now or in the future under a court of law under the Contract Business Law Statue of Practice. As for what happens to the shares of the involved corporations no more explanation is needed as the already actions mentioned clearly stated of the expectations of a merge’s share involvement.
... it is can at times be about co-operation and this is evident in the merger of BHP and Billiton in 2001. What BHP Billiton should have learnt from this analysis is that if they continue to diversify, look for new opportunities in emerging markets and maintain a good public image than maintaining success will not be as difficult as it is to build it up in todays times. It is also important to note as it has been evident in the past that the joint ventures and mergers are becoming increasingly more popular as it opens up many different avenues into conducting business in other parts of the world as well as giving more power and control to MNCs in controlling markets, in an increasingly more globalized world we must put at best foot forward to diversify and integrate business and cultures to remain globally competitive.
The soft factors can make or break a successful change process, since new structures and strategies are difficult to build upon inappropriate cultures and values. These problems often come up in the dissatisfying results of spectacular mega-mergers. The lack of success and synergies in such mergers is often based in a clash of completely different cultures, values, and styles, which make it difficult to establish effective common systems and structuresBased on the case study, extensive research and annual reports of AT&T the writer has mapped AT&T in the different domains. AT&T should strive to attain a perfect circle as close to the centre as possible, which indicates total synergy, order and equilibrium. Where the circle is skewed drastic change is needed as it moves closer to the outer ring of chaos:
Yan, A. and Luo, Y. (2001), International Joint Ventures: Theory and Practice. (New York and London: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.).
Mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) refer to the consolidation of two companies and occur for a number of reasons, including growth, synergy, market power, sustainable competitive advantage, and diversification. M&As enable organizations to share resources, leverage competencies, gain flexibility and create opportunities that the organization may not otherwise have been able to create. An increase of international mergers and acquisitions seen over the last few years can be attributed to advances in technology, globalization and deregulation. Globalization and increased competition have resulted in organizations expanding their operations to foreign markets (Antila & Kakkonen, 2008). While M&As are widely utilized, many are not successful.
A merger occurs when two or more companies combined their business and assets to convert them in a new company (or to one of themselves). On the other hand, an acquisition occurs when one company acquires no of shares in another to get control of that company. The shareholders of the acquired company are paid off and the acquirer becomes owner of all or a substantial part of the assets of the acquired company .In merger one of the two companies losses its old identity to make a new one (Kithinji and Waweru, 2007). The profitability and efficiency of merged organization is higher than non merged organizations and they are in strong position (Amir, Diamantoudi and Xue, 2008). Merger or acquisition creates real potential for explosive growth and enhanced profitability by making appreciation of people, who involved themselves in its success or failure through their contribution (Daniel and Metcalf, 2001)
The strategic alliance approached by selling Mazda’s 25% share to Ford motor company. So it was a strategic alliance and shared ownership type. Shared ownership alliance is actually one special form of joint venture.
The topic under review is strategic alliances. This particular form of non-equity alliance between firms in the same industry (competitors) is becoming an increasingly popular way of conducting business in the global environment. Many different reasons of why such alliances are occurring have been recognized. These include: the increasing globalization of the world's economy resulting in intensified global competition, the proliferation and disbursement of technology, and the shortening of product life-cycles. This critique will use Kenichi Ohmae's viewpoint on strategic alliances as a benchmark for comparison. Firstly, a summary of Ohmae's article will be provided. Secondly, in order to critique Ohmae's opinion, it will be necessary to review other literature on the topic. Thirdly, a discussion of the various viewpoints and studies, that have hence arisen, will be discussed in detail. Finally, conclusions will be drawn with implications for companies operating in today's global environment, together with suggestions for future research on strategic alliances.
Indicated by the exact meaning of the word, the term merger and acquisition(M&A) describes two different circumstances. A merger is the unification of two or more firms into a new one, while an acquisition is one company’s purchase of the majority of the shares from another (Bressmer 1989, Pausenberger 1990, Brauchlin 1990). A M&A is thus characterized by the fact that after unification there are fewer firms than before. After an acquisition, however, the target firm can either remain autonomous, or be partially or wholly integrated into the new parent company, although the firms remain independent entities from a legal point of view.
The definitions that would describe merging of two companies are an example of two words; consolidation and convergence. The definitions of the word consolidation means “the process of uniting: the quality or state of being united: specifically: the unification of two or more corporations by dissolution of existing ones and creation of a single new corporation” (2016, Merriam, Webster) the word convergence meaning “the merging of distinct technologies, industries, or devices into a unified whole.”(2016, Merriam, Webster)
A successful organization recognizes its need to adapt changes to survive global competition. Locally and around the globe, mergers and acquisitions are becoming more common between companies. Mergers occur when two or more companies combine their operations and participate as equal partners in order to achieve strategic and business objectives (Sudarsanam, 2003). Sudarsanam, S 2003, Creating Value from Mergers and Acquisitions The Challenges An Integrated and International Perspective, Harlow FT Prentice Hall. An acquisition occurs when a company takes over a smaller company and gets control to determine how combined operations will be managed (Shook & Roth, 2010). Shook, L V & Roth,