Corruption In Esperanza's The House On Mango Street

871 Words2 Pages

Furthermore, her proletariat status contributes into her family’s interpellation, which can be seen through the commodification and conspicuous consumption of the home. According to Ann Dobie, interpellation occurs when “the working class is manipulated to accept the ideology of the dominant class” (86). Therefore, readers see how Esperanza becomes disappointed in the sign and exchange value of the house on Mango Street when Sister Superior guesses and points to “a row of ugly three-flats, the ones even the raggedy men are ashamed to go into” (Cisneros 45) is Esperanza’s home. Esperanza claims the row of ugly flats as her own because she is more embarrassed by her family’s actual home on Mango Street. Essentially, she recognizes that their …show more content…

However, Esperanza is a victim of conspicuous consumption as readers can identify when she says, “I knew I had to have a house. A real house. One I could point to” (Cisneros 5). Therefore, she values the sign and exchange value more than the use value. Essentially, the sign and exchange value of the house is a part of the repressive ideologies of the European-American bourgeoisie; the house is part of the bourgeoisie’s manipulation that takes place “by reinforcing capitalistic ideology through its arts… however, the arts of the privileged are not all the arts that exist” (Dobie 86). Therefore, the family is manipulated into believing that the home is not suitable for living based on the values of the bourgeoisie, which exhibits the bourgeoisie’s power and the proletariat’s inferior …show more content…

Patriarchal Chicana culture can certainly contribute to the feeling of confinement for female characters, such as Mamacita, Esperanza’s great-grandmother, and Rafaela, as they “lean out the window and lean on [their] elbow and dream” (Cisneros 78). Furthermore, readers see how Rafaela “gets locked indoors because her husband is afraid Rafaela will run away since she is too beautiful to look at” even though “Rafaela wishes she could go dance” (Cisneros 79). Therefore, she “submit[s to] the hegemony of the man and the society by which [she is] encompassed” (Kalay 119) due to her husband’s machismo. However, Esperanza serves as an example of women who view the home as a symbol of liberation and independence. For example, Esperanza claims that she does “Not [want] a flat. Not an apartment. Not a man’s house. Not a daddy’s house. A house all on my own…Nobody to shake a stick at. Nobody’s garbage to pick up after” (Cisneros 108). Therefore, her house is an expression of independence because she recognizes “her power is her own,” and “She will not give it away” (Cisneros 89). Therefore, she views owning a house of her own as a symbol of success, independence, and liberation from her patriarchal culture and proletariat status. Certainly, the house represents the intersectionality of gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status through its foundational and

Open Document