Arnholt Vs. Carlisle: Case Study

470 Words1 Page

In the case between Arnholt vs. Carlisle, William Arnholt the plaintiff in this case filed a complaint against John Carlisle, the defendant in this case in order to seek the title to the disputed property on the grounds of adverse possession after a dispute broke out (Bagley, 2016, p. 572). So the two biggest issues to take out of this case are zoning and adverse possession. Zoning can be defined as the division of a city into districts and the application of specific land use regulations in each district (Bagley, 2016, p. G-32). So in this case, there is zoning relief to the purchasers as the real use of property is different from the land use regulations. As for adverse possession, it can be defined as when a person can acquire legal ownership

Open Document