Would I use Open Source Software over free commercial software?
Before considering the use of open source software for a business, I think it must be considered whether I would use open source software and why; these reasons, or similar ones, might apply to the business environment. While I mainly use commercial software packages, I do also use open source software programs, namely Firefox. The reason I use Firefox as my default browser over IE or Chrome is because of the customization options that is available. The other two browsers are customizable, but not to the same extent that Firefox is. Perhaps the reason for this customizability is because it is open source, and thus developers are not limited to the amount access that is given to them as in the case of developers of commercial software.
There is also a repository of add-ons, or extensions, that are available to be installed in Firefox. It should be noted that these extensions are not guaranteed to be safe. So if you install an extension it could mess-up your computer, steal your information . . . or work perfectly; there is no guarantee nor does there need to be one. There is no legal ramification for Mozilla should some complication arise.
This would be very hard for a commercial software company to directly implement because there is an agreement that the company's software (e.g. the software will not steal your identity.) To implement this, a commercial company could have testers for the extension to make sure they are safe, this would probably be very time consuming and expensive especially if there are a large number of extensions. Alternatively, they could hire developers who create the extensions, but the limited number of developers certainly could not...
... middle of paper ...
...n Firefox. If this simple feature is taken from open source software, what other features might commercial software also have implemented? An example of the opposite, open source software taking features from commercial software is OpenOffice. OpenOffice is virtually the same as Microsoft Office; they both have a text editor, spreadsheet, and a slideshow program. Inside these programs the functionality is very close to, if not, the same also.
However, I do not think that open source software threatens to take commercial software out of business. For the simple reason of, 'How many businesses choose to use open source software over commercial software'? Open source software, in my opinion, might undercut a small percentage of the profits of the commercial software companies in the SOHO market, but nothing that would significantly hurt the commercial companies.
The company might face the problem of having their advanced software technology stolen because they were not protected by any patents. It is common that competitors steal somebody’s ideas and develop them. Competition will then be more intense.
The whole trial is about the free internet browser, Internet Explorer, that Microsoft gives out free and includes with its Operating system, Windows. Netscape does the same marketing of its product except that it does not have any operating system to sell with. Netscape is a relatively older browser and prior to Internet Explorer, there was only one browser, Netscape. There have been innumerous upgrades and newer versions of these browsers since Internet Explorer’s launch in the market.
The advantages as I mentioned earlier that a single company does not have control. The distributed system projects any problems of disclosures and accountability between the employees and the institutions whose interest is not aligned with their job tasks. This basically provides and exposes information in real time and removes errors with another’s internal records. This provides members of the network a tool to visible observe and track an activity along the supply chain. For instance, Chipotle could see in real time whether a properly credentialed person in a facility owed by one of its beef suppliers is carrying out appropriate sterilization and disinfection procedures. The disadvantage of the blockchain technology lies in the development and governance. A great deal of companies seek to protect their data and information from disclosing their market share and profits whereas public blockchain data is pulled from commercial and production activity would be cryptographically recorded in open ledgers. In addition to that we have the underling laws. For example, laws and regulation that monitors the commercial codes that govern the rights of ownership and possession under specific
1. There are several advantages to proprietary products over open source products: better quality control issues in creating products; a firmer control over the licensing, either the technology the product is based on or what material (music in this case) can be used with the proprietary device; the potential to build brand loyalty (for example Sony memory cards only work in their products, if you’ve already bought these cards you could be more likely to purchase additional Sony products in the future); pricing – companies could possibly charge a premium price for their proprietary products as there could be few to no competitors in a specific market space; vertical markets (if Sony is providing the device, memory card and music the majority of revenues are staying in-house); and proprietary products could potentially create barriers to entry.
I am totally fine with using company devices separate from my own personal device. They have so much restriction on their devices, and they would just have the same restrictions on my personal device. For example on my business laptop, they have removed the wireless network card, microphone, and webcam and restricted me from accessing specific websites or downloading software. I can see it being convenient to use a personal device for work, but you would get frustrated during your personal time at ho...
Sam Palmisano's team approach and dissolution of management sets the stage for improved morale in IBM. As the decision making process is extended communication improves across the organization and a learning culture is established. A collaborative environment inspires innovation of new products as the divisions are aligned with IBM's strategic goals. Palmisano's support of open-source platforms provides the vital ingredients necessary to build the backbone of the on demand system that he envisions IBM will provide to customers. As Sam's vision blossoms a symbiotic relationship is formed that will provide enhanced business applications and services to customers and a recurring source or revenue for IBM.
...ve to the different functionality and appearance of these applications, even though they can open Microsoft Office documents.
...as well as POS systems, which would allow them to offer a package which the businesses has all areas of a small business covered with one product. They could develop their own system that is fully integrated or work together with existing providers. By building their own system will allow them control the customer experience fully and ensure the product remains of the highest quality which builds a value with its customers.
There are tried-and-true methods that are usually already known before employees attain their jobs, and in order to get employees to accept and learn new software it would have to be engaging and innovative. Often the case with this type of software all it does is provide a new user interface where employees have to learn new ways to do the same tasks. The design of any such software needs to be able to present coherent and current data, which is pertinent to their jobs, as well as provide an easy to learn interface that is convenient to use. The software should provide an appealing way to do tasks, in a way that also engenders a desire to
...to the competitor of the organisation, the organisation will loss the profit and can make the whole organisation going down.
For instance, Microsoft had no interest in supplying the market with web-based versions of its office software until Google had tremendous success with Google Docs. Microsoft, until then content with sales of the traditional installed versions of its office suite, was forced to counter Google Docs and create a Software as a Service (SaaS) compliment to its current offering. To differentiate itself from Google, Microsoft seems to have spent more time on formatting, and syncing with the desktop version, while Google has concentrated on ease of use and promoting collaboration.
I will have to show the use of the software browser package. I will do my research using search engines to find out about:
Obviously, for a solution to have real business value, return on investment and total cost of ownership must be assessed (another business analyst task). However, value to the organisation isn't just in the numbers. Solutions must also contribute to the organisation's mission, which may involve intangible benefits. An organisation that prides itself on software that's "easy to use" may not be able to quantify the benefits of improving the user experience but does know that constantly improving that experiences is essential to the organisation achieving its
The cost of the hardware and software itself is very pricey, along with the upgrades that it costs to keep it running. If a growing small business wants to change from a computer file-based system to a database system, it must be converted. This is a difficult task and time consuming, because you will have to hire a database designer, system designer and application programmers, and since a database management system should not be taken lightly, it is important to hire professionals that will do it right. After creating it, it is important to teach staff members how to use it, which will require time and more money. They will have to learn about programming, application development and database administration. It will also cost a company more money to pay people to handle the database management system. This will include a database administrator and application programmers, which are trained professionals which require a hefty
In this write up the focus is mainly on e-business. It consists of critical discussion and analysis of the impact of adopting e-business orientation. It also contains relevant information on the current state of e-business market.