Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The American Red Cross is
The American Red Cross is
The American Red Cross is
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The American Red Cross is
5.2 Why and how people give?
Overall donations to charities is dominated by Inner Directed people. Inner Direct people are the most likely out of the three to give to a cause as they are the tester and innovators and are always question what is right and what is wrong.
In these following graphs the axis is the average from the population that was asked during the survey. So the first graph shows that 11% agrees with the statement ‘they are regular givers and give to one or more charities’ it shows that Inner Directed people are 30 times more likely than the average person to donate. So here Inner Directed people are over-indexed by 30% which means they are 30 % more likely to give to more than one charity than the average person.
Whereas Sustenance Driven people are 26 times less likely to donate than the average person. Meaning they are under- indexed by 26% meaning they are 26% less likely to donate to more than one charity at any given time.
These figures show that Charities such as the British Red Cross should focus their marketing efforts mainly towards the Inner Directed group as they are 30 times more likely to donate to more than one charity than the average person so if people are already donating to other charities, by focusing on the Inner Directed people the British Red Cross could be getting donations as well as other charities. If the charity also looked at the other two types of people and did some persuasive campaigning to get their attention they would be able to widen their appeal range and increase donations.
Figure 2 from Philanthropy Review 2011 by C. Fiennes
The British Red Cross’s new advertising campaign does just this and focuses on all three types of people. The advert shows clips from both the ...
... middle of paper ...
...ilanthropy Review 2011 by C. Fiennes.
Corporate-NGO Partnerships Barometer 2012 by M. Amadi
Managing in the ‘new normal’ – adapting to uncertainty by I. Oakley-Smith, C. Bradshaw and P. Lewis
MONEY FOR GOOD UK (Understanding donor motivation and behavior) March 2013 by S. Bagwell, L. de Las Casas, M. van Poortvliet and R. Abercrombie
http://www.redcross.org.uk/Where-we-work/Overseas
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/226985/fuel_poverty_report_2013.pdf
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDEQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.afro.who.int%2Fen%2Fclusters-a-programmes%2Ffrh%2Fchild-and-adolescent-health%2Fprogramme-components%2Fchild-health.html&ei=1XtVU4WjEKHe7Aa634D4BA&usg=AFQjCNFce0VYO6J5UJfeAjWZODczhWrAGw&sig2=b8BbutBPX9BzHf_HzoZ3Ag
http://www.energybillrevolution.org/fuel-poverty/
This book is important to business students because it shows that even the most seasoned executive runs into unexpected challenges and can find themselves in uncharted territory. Jim Barton’s experiences and lessons can be lessons for anyone. Any employee, whether they are support staff or a top executive, should always maintain an open mind and be ready to learn from a situation or the people around them at any time.
In other words, Singer believes that unless you can find something wrong with the following argument, you will have to drastically change your lifestyle and how you spend your money. Although some people might believe that his conclusion is too radical, Singer insists that it is the logical result of his argument. In sum, his view is that all affluent people should give much more to famine relief. While I agree with Singer’s argument in principle, I have a problem with his conclusion. In my view, the conclusion that Singer espouses is underdeveloped.
Most people feel that they should help the needy in some way or another. The problem is how to help them. This problem generally arises when there is a person sitting on the side of the road in battered clothes with a cardboard sign asking for some form of help, almost always in the form of money. Yet something makes the giver uneasy. What will they do with this money? Do they need this money? Will it really help them? The truth of the matter is, it won't. However, there are things that can be done to help the needy. Giving money to a reliable foundation will help the helpless, something that transferring money from a pocket to a man's tin can will never do.
people. In fact, the "desperate donors" that pay the price are usually the poor people
. Motivations to volunteer: The role of altruism. International Review on Public and Non-profit Marketing2006;3(2):79-91
George, Jennifer M. "Chapter 12." Contemporary Management. By Gareth R. Jones 8e ed.N.p.: n.p., n.d. 366-400. Print.
In the essay Samaritan’s Dilemma, Robert Sirico claims that charity is not always helpful to society. He implies that some people take advantage of others kindness, in this case, soup kitchens.
Homelessness is a major issue in our world today. There is an abundant amount of people who live on the street and barely have anything they can call their own. These people probably lived great lives at some point, they probably never thought of the concept of becoming homeless until it happened. Luckily there is help being brought to them from different kinds of sources in order to help get them back on the road to a happy and fulfilled life. Certain people in society have a desire to get homeless people off the streets, to get them food, clothing, and most importantly love. These people are volunteers who enjoy spending their free time helping the ones in need because they love to give back to their community . There is major volunteer groups out there like StandUp For Kids, this organization helps to improve lives of the homeless and street kids. Volunteers have a desire to get people off the streets because they know that no should feel as if they are worth nothing in this world. Besides the goodness of helping others, aiding to help the homeless people get back up in life, it can help make the economy better. Usually there is money
After analyzing the decision that I have kept since I was younger. I realized that such thoughts might have developed due to my ignorance and the fact that I never took it upon myself to research the main ideology behind being a donor.
American Red Cross has been viewed as the nation’s elite humanitarian organization, dedicating themselves to aiding people in need throughout the United States. The American affiliation has also held a joint association with the global Red Cross and Red Crescent networks throughout the world. They are highly dependent on the contributions of American public volunteers time, blood, and money to help support their lifesaving services and programs. All volunteers and employees, alongside the generous donors share a mission of preventing and relieving suffering, not just in the United States but around the world. According to RedCross.org they do this through five key service areas:
For those who lack healthy organs, organ donations can save their life. Although there’s a tight spot, there is a shortage of much needed organs; the Mayo Clinic notes, “More than 101,000 people are waiting today for transplant surgeries.” The clinic goes on to state that while daily, 77 people receive organ transplants, nineteen die waiting for a transplant. Those waiting for transplants could likely be saved with a larger pool for organ donation. Many proposals have arisen to increase the number of organ donors in the United States, ranging from presumed consent to financial incentives for organ donation. The latter, financial incentives, is a common suggestion drawing much controversy. While some assert that financial incentives could save lives, others argue that paying for organs will erode altruism and will ca...
Kotter, J. P & Schlesinger, L. (2008). ‘Choosing strategies for change’. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 130-139.
To this uncertain world, the Red Cross has been very instrumental in the lives of people. No matter what, even in the worst case scenario, they are always the first one to gives us their hand. The free assistance it renders to the deprived people in beyond any monetary value. The generous donors and volunteers exemplifies the real existence of this organization. This helps in uniting people together in difficult times. Since the first time I fully knew about the Red Cross, I have been extremely enthusiastic about working for it in near future.
The Charity Organization Society was based in the scientific movement of organizations. Workers believed that charity work needed more definition and organization and that charity should be focused more on individual need rather than as a whole population. Focusing on individual need was intended to improve relief operations while making resources more efficient. They also intended to eliminate public outdoor relief. With the promotion of more organization and efficiency the new Charity Organization Societies were born. Trattner states that these new requirements for organization and efficiency spread so “rapidly that within 6 years 25 cities had such organizations and by the turn of the century there were some 138 of them in existence” (Trattner, 1999).
Poor people are filled with hope and the desire to help others that are in need of