Father and Son Relationship in Hamlet
Hamlet, of the play, Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, is a young man with many distinctive characteristics. He is the loving and beloved son of Hamlet, the deceased King of Denmark. He is talented in many ways, as actor, athlete, and scholar. Prince Hamlet draws upon many of his talents as he goes through a remarkable metamorphosis, changing from an average, responsible, young Prince to an apparently mad, raging son intent upon avenging his father’s untimely death.
In the beginning of Hamlet, the Prince behaves as any normal person would following the death of a loved one. Not only is this a loved one, but an extra special someone; it is his loving father whom he adored. Hamlet is grief stricken, depressed, and even angry that his mother remarried so soon after his father’s death. Having witnessed how his father had treated his mother with great love and respect, Hamlet cannot understand how his mother could shorten the grieving period so greatly to marry someone like Uncle Claudius. He is incapable of rationalizing her deeds and he is obsessed by her actions.
Throughout the play Hamlet is in constant conflict with himself. An appearance of a ghost claiming to be his father, “I am thy father’s spirit”(I.v.14) aggravates his grief, nearly causing him to commit suicide and leaving him deeply disgusted and angered. Upon speaking with his ghost-father, Hamlet learns that his uncle-stepfather killed Hamlet the King. “The serpent that did sting thy father’s life Now wears his crown”(I.v.45-46) Hamlet is beside himself and becomes obsessed with plotting and planning revenge for the death of his father.
Hamlet struggles constantly, trying to decide how he should go about avenging the loss of his father to his deceitful uncle-stepfather. Planning to kill him isn’t easy. Hamlet is given many opportunities to kill Claudius, but keeps stalling for time to be certain the ghost had spoken the truth about the murder. Finally, Hamlet decides upon a plan. “the play’s the thing/Wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the King”(II.ii.612-613). He will stage a performance for the King that would actually be a reenactment of his father’s murder. The play he chooses to reenact is entitled "The Murder of Gonzago" with a few changes made to accommodate Hamlet’s new lines and actions reflecting Claudius murdering his father. Upon seeing Claudius’s crazy behavior during and following Hamlet’s play, Hamlet realizes that his ghost-father had spoken the truth.
Outside the jailhouse before the trial began, Scout learned that as a child she could make angry men stand in Atticus’ shoes for a minute. There was a crowd who was made with Atticus, and they wanted to hang Tom Robinson. She talked to Walter Cunningham directly about his own family, which reminded him of what a decent person he really was. He then led the group away. (“Last night you made Walter Cunningham stand in my shoes for a minute. That was enough.”—Atticus (Lee, pg. 157)). Mr. Cunnigham was only in that group of people because he (and most of the other men) were afraid something bad would happen to them if they turned on Atticus’ side.
In the novel Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck brings out the themes of Lonliness and companionship, and strengths and weaknesses through the actions, and quotations of the characters. Irony and foreshadowing play a large roll on how the story ends. Lennie and his habit of killing things not on purpose, but he is a victim of his own strength. George trying to pretend that his feelings for Lennie mean nothing. The entire novel is repetitive in themes and expressed views.
In the beginning of the play, Hamlet's father comes to him as a ghost from the grave. He tells Hamlet of his uncle's betrayal of him and tells Hamlet that he must kill Claudius to set things right. Through this event, Hamlet...
In the story there is an unusual resident of Maycomb County, he goes by the name of Boo Radley. The Finch children have heard many different stories about him. Boo never comes outside, if he has no one has ever seen him. Throughout the chapters’ the kids devise a plan to catch a glimpse of Boo. Scout wanted to go with them, but when she started thinking about how dangerous the plan could be, Jem quickly put a halt to her thoughts. “Scout, I'm tellin’ you for the last time, shut your trap or go home-I declare to the Lord you’re getting more like a girl every day!...With that, I had no option but to join them” (Lee, 51-52). The boys had created more than one plan to lure Mr. Radley out of the house. Because she is adventurous, Scout made herself a part the action, even if her brother did not wish for her to. Also, Jem, Dill and Scout were all talking in the yard when Scout had an idea. “I ran to the backyard and pulled an old car tire from under the house. I slapped it up to the front yard. “I’m first,” I said” (Lee, 37). Because she was so eager to do something daring, she gained some respect from Dill and her older
Hamlet is in utter despair over his mother’s actions, stating in his first soliloquy that he wishes God had not made suicide a sin, and that the world was now “weary, stale, flat, and unprofitable” (I.ii.137). In Hamlet’s mind, the world he knows is spiraling out of control and he grapples to understand what is happening around him. Hamlet’s furious reaction to the betrayal displays his deep confusion and anger that persists throughout the remainder of the play and sets the stage for the acts to come. He feels as if his mother has not only betrayed him, but betrayed his dear father.
Grendel is a very complicated character some people believe that he is a monster and others believe that he is a human with a couple of personal problems. All of these confusions are because Grendel as a character changes so much throughout the story . For example, he kills humans to eat them, however he feels bad after he is done, but can not stop himself when he is doing it. To start of Grendel's mother affects grendel's change a lot in this story mainly because she raised him. As a result, she raised him just how she wanted and made him just how she wants him even if he didn't want to be that person. Since she made him how she wanted he doesn't appreciate her he feels “she was pitiful, foul, her smile a jogged white tear in the” ( grendel 50) Grendel is describing his mother .
This evidence comes to show that Latham's criminal history is jeopardizing and not benefiting him with this further case. Due to the fact that appellant shoes a lack of remorse there is no merit to the contention. The court is pretty much going against the appellant
The humans refused to accept him, his mother basically ignored him, and he lacked any meaningful conversations. By the end of the story, my view of Grendel had not changed; I still see him as a misunderstood character who makes mistakes and deserves empathy and pity. My view of Grendel shows that I do not label anything as entirely evil, but rather see acts of evil as a result of our societal values. People view Grendel as a horrific beast who does not consider the right thing to do, but I believe that Grendel just does what he was taught. He kills off of necessity, and treats others the way that his more taught him. I understand his nihilism, and share many of his thoughts, as Grendel and I both live off of our own moral values and reject religion. Perhaps it is our similarities that cause me to hold so much empathy for Grendel, but my empathy also reveals my nature. I do not accept the single side of a person, but consider the "gray area" and how their community changes them. Grendel lacks a strong community, and lives in a society where life is constantly cycling. I believe that Grendel became evil due to his loose societal values, and that he is a great example of the truth that nothing can be entirely evil, and most evil is just a misunderstood attempt to
Grendel is personified at this time yet he is still further misconstrued as a ferocious animal. Additionally, this demonstrates the divide between Grendel and the humans even though they have many of the same features. They both speak the same language and use logic to make decisions. Humans share a connection and should bond with this humanoid creature and communicate, but the humans are oblivious to the life around them. To sum up, Grendel is personified, but is not understood by the only people that speak his language, therefore leading him to being isolated in his childhood and his foreseeable demise later on.
Hamlet is still in mourning of his father’s death but feels that most of the people have moved on much quickly with the death of his father. And after a couple months his mother is remarried and a twist of turned events to find out that it is his uncle, Claudius which is his new step Father. Filled with anger he does not know how to digest this news. To top it off is visit buy the Ghost of Hamlet (hamlets father) to tell Prince Hamlet that his uncle Claudius is the murderer. And demand that he takes revenge upon him and kill Claudius. “To be or not to be,’ (3.1.56) true to himself or carry on bloody traditions of his war like father. But being visited by his father’s warlike spirit triggered him to be lunatic and he is lunatic because he was compared to the moon shining with the bloody borrow sheen of his warlike father (2.2.52). However, before he had even spoken to the Ghost of Hamlet he had been warned by Haratio...
In what ways can lessons learned by the character of a story affect the reader? In East of Eden by John Steinbeck, there are two generations of twin brothers introduced, Adam and Charles, and Aron and Cal. Adam and Charles, the older generation of brothers, face many family obstacles. Later, one of the brothers, Adam, has two twin boys of his own, Cal and Aron. These boys face similar conflicts throughout their lives together. These struggles help teach the reader several lessons including ones involving jealousy, parents, rejection, and the idea of timshel. As the story develops and the characters learn valuable life lessons through experience, the reader is also affected by these themes and can grow as well.
Grendel is alone; he can not know God’s love and be comforted. He is an outcast, and the sins of his forefather have fallen upon him. Evil can not stand God being glorified just as the praising of God by the Danes angered Grendel.
While Grendel may possess a brute strength, his lack of wit and logic is what ultimately leads to his downfall and demise. In Beowulf, the actions and character that of Beowulf, or an Epic Hero, define the perfect Anglo-Saxon warrior. Epic heroes are indicated by a variety of traits, including that they, “must look like a hero, they must be noble, famous, strong, courageous, humble, prideful, thick-skinned, self-sacrificing, faithful, focused, be a leader, and have a tragic flaw” (Jones 3). Unfortunately, aside from the ‘tragic flaw’ and ‘strong’ categories, Grendel’s character is antithetical to all characteristics of an Epic Hero. This makes him quite the villain, and a generally despicable character. “Suddenly then, / the God-cursed brute creating havoc: / greedy and grim, he grabbed thirty men”
Hamlet by William Shakespeare is one of the world’s most revered literature. The main character, Hamlet, is arguably one of the most intriguing characters the playwright ever developed. Hamlet is daring, philosophical, mentally unstable at times, and clever. Throughout the play though, these characteristics change and/or diminish as Hamlet is put through a plethora of unfortunate events. His father is murdered by Claudius, his mother soon after marries Claudius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern betray him, and his girlfriend most likely commits suicide. While Hamlet is incredibly philosophical, indecisive, and full of resentment in the beginning of the play, he becomes violent, instinctive, caring and sympathetic towards the end of the play.
Overall, the main complaint many have with John Steinbeck in regards to his writing it the choice of the title The Grapes Of Wrath for his most well-known novel. The choice of the title may seem illogical and unnecessary, but if one were to analyze his reasoning and the meaning of the title one can come to the conclusion that there was no choice that could top what he ultimately decided on. The analyzation of these two in combination with each other leads to a new understanding of Steinbeck’s choice; the process of this is started with learning the literal, historical reasoning behind the title, followed by inspecting the deeper meaning in regards to hopes and prosperity, and finally by analyzing the ties of cruelty and selfishness by some