Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
effect of death penalty to society
capital punishment and effects in society
the effects of the death penalty to individuals and society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: effect of death penalty to society
The Death Penalty – Socially Sanctioned Murder
Capital punishment is not "actual" punishment. It's a capital
reaction to a type of criminal act. It serves no purpose. When a person is
executed, the person learns no lesson. He or she cannot say, "Hey! I
learned my lesson. I surely won't do that again," for he or she is dead.
Although the word "punishment" is used in varying contexts, it is
generally accepted that it is served out unpleasantly to an individual in
hopes that that person learns from the punishment and, therefore, doesn't
repeat the bad deed.
Good grief... So, why execute? The question is one of justification.
It is wrong to deliberately kill another person, yet capital punishment (or
"killing") consists of doing precisely this.
Cost of the Death Penalty
Capital punishment in California, as in every other state, is more
expensive than a life imprisonment sentence without the opportunity of
parole. These costs are not the result of frivolous appeals but rather the
result of Constitutionally mandated safeguards that can be summarized as
follows:
Juries must be given clear guidelines on sentencing, which result
in explicit provisions for what constitutes aggravating and mitigating
circumstances. Defendants must have a dual trial--one to establish guilt or
innocence and if guilty a second trial to determine whether or not they
would get the death penalty. Defendants sentenced to death are granted
oversight protection in an automatic appeal to the state supreme court.
These constitutional safeguards translate into:
- a more extensive jury selection procedure
- a four fold increase in the number of motions filed
- a longer, dual trial process
- more investigators and expert testimony
- more lawyers specializing in death penalty litigation
- and automatic, mandatory appeals
Since there are few defendants who will plead guilty to a capital
charge, virtually every death penalty trial becomes a jury trial with all
of the above necessary requirements and expenses. In Los Angeles County,
the total cost of capital punishment is $2,087,926. In Los Angeles County,
the total cost of life imprisonment without possibility of parole is
$1,448,935.
General Studies
A study done by the Sacramento Bee argued that California would
save $90 million per year if it were to abolish the death penalty. The
average cost of a capital trial in Texas is $2.3 million--three times the
cost to incarcerate an individual for 40 years. The average cost of a
capital trial in Florida is $3.2 million.
Myths and Facts
Deterrence
Scientific studies have consistently failed to demonstrate that
executions deter people from committing crime. The respected Thorsten
“He lies like an eyewitness” (5). An eyewitness’s story is usually one that develops solely from the observation of an event with no knowledge other than what the eyewitness assumes he or she saw and perceives to be true; similar to Zadie Smith’s narrator in “Stuart”. Zadie Smith incorporates a third person narration and in this passage, since the narrator is not aware of the boys’ thoughts, all interpretations and statements made are directly from observations. “It’s hard to tell from this angle...”(5) and yet after this statement the narrator still begins to create a description of the boys based on their appearance and behaviour. This is due to the fact that it is human nature to observe and quickly come to conclusions. These judgements also arise from stereotypes and widely-accepted truths, for example the narrator assumes the boys use a lot of hair products and maybe even toothpaste to make their hair “more substantial”(5) and she also assumes that they are always “on the move” (6) and travel “in a pack”(6). The vibrant imagery and vivid comparisons used to describe these boys not onl...
that society has a moral obligation to protect the safety and the welfare of its
begins to write on the wall in front of him with the freshly spilled blood
“Our position… is that there is no place for capital punishment… We believe that justice for all is better served by a sentence of life imprisonment.”(Szumski 170) The administration of Capital punishment in the United States has been a failed experiment. Capital punishment or “The death penalty” is the legally authorized killing of a human being as punishment for a crime. The entire process of Capital punishment is fraught with error, since 1973, over 87 inmates have been released from death row due to their innocence being proven. (Blecker, 12) Capital punishment attacks the poor, as well as the black community. For the worst crimes, life without parole is better. Not only is the death penalty discriminatory and unethical, it violates the
Public will feel safe knowing the law is doing justice. Capital punishment, otherwise known as the death penalty, has been effective tool in our country’s justice system since its inception. When an inmate is given this, the harshest sentence avail...
The term GM foods or GMO (genetically-modified organisms) is most commonly used to refer to crop plants created for human or animal consumption using the latest molecular biology techniques (Whitman, 2000). These plants have been modified in the laboratory to offer desired traits such as increased resistance to herbicides or improved nutritional content. Also, genetic engineering techniques have been applied to create plants with the exact desired trait very rapidly and accurately. For example, this is done by the geneticist isolating the gene responsible for drought tolerance and inserts it into another plant. The new genetically-modified plant will now have gained drought tolerance as well.
We live in a world that is constantly changing and advancing thanks to technological advancements, especially in the field of molecular genetics. Today, we are discovering and implementing new ways to overcome the ill-fated symptoms developed as a result from poor health or accidents. We are also making advancements in the field of agriculture thanks to molecular genetics. As we all know, food is an essential entity in our lives and is abundant as well as relatively easy to obtain here in the United States. However, as good as it may sound, this is not necessarily true for developing countries. Many people in developing countries receive very little food, if any, due to its scarcity. It is estimated that in Asia alone, close to 800 million people go to bed hungry every night due to food shortage. This problem can be alleviated by turning to the production of genetically modified organisms (a.k.a. GMOs).
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are a cause of continuous debate. What would be the purpose of producing genetically altered food? Many argue that GMOs could prove to be very beneficial, the use of GMOs could lead to advances in medicine, and agriculture, and they could also prevent famine in poor underdeveloped countries. Genetic modification offers many benefits: pest control, disease resistant crops, drought resistant crops, no use of insecticides, nutritional beneficial foods, and less contamination. This is only a short list of the many benefits offered by the used of GMOs. With so many benefits why are we opposed to such a miracle? (NERC 2005)
Communication between males and females has always been somewhat complicated. Because we are arguing that males and females have different cultures we wanted to take a look at what some of these differences might be. According to our research the inherent differences between male and female culture are the different roles that society holds for them and the ways these roles lead to different communication styles. The stereotypes that men and women grow up with affect the types of ways in which they communicate. We first wanted to take a look at how they specifically differ while men and women are arguing or having normal conversations. We also looked at the different types of networks that men and women share. These networks also differ and as do the reasonings for their formation. Although we do not think that men and women need to change their cultures to effectively communicate, we do think that better communication is possible. One of the researchers we took a look at was Deborah Tannen. According to Tannen the reason that men and women do not communicate well is that men and women use language differently. Women take the attitude that conversation is to explore solutions to common problems while men concern themselves more with getting information and hard data from conversation. Tannen states that what women look for in communication is human connection, while men consider status to be most important. They are looking for independence and are constantly looking for higher accomplishments. Intimacy threatens this independence, so men have a tendency to avoid it. One of the old sayings about women is that they talk more than men. It turns out that it is not necessarily true. Women seem to talk more in private conversations than do men. Women do not generally have a fear of intimacy and therefore are much more open with one another during private conversations. It is more difficult for women to use this type of communication style in the public arena. In that case it is men that do most of the talking. Tannen ultimately argues that men use communication as a weapon. They use long explanations to command attention from who it is they are speaking to. They use it to convey information and to ultimately gain agreement. Tannen suggests that through even simple conversation men are continually protecting their status. She sugg...
“Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement” (Tolkien, 1994.) Capital punishment, or more commonly known as the death penalty, has been a hotly controversial issue throughout the history of humankind. Some people have the view that Hammurabi had in his own law code, “an eye for an eye,” whereas others believe that it is wrong to kill another person no matter the nature of their crime. In the essays, “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” by Edward Koch and “The Death Penalty” by David Bruck, this controversy is once again discussed and argued between two knowledgeable authors.
The relationship of gender and linguistic behavior is a compelling topic which is getting more and more attention since it is closely related to gender studies. It is widely agreed that men and women use language differently in most speech communities, though to various extents (Holmes, 2001). Many works on the topic indicate that gender-specific linguistic behavior is a social practice which is based on gender identities and power relations (Eckert & McConnell-Ginet, 1992; Bruckmüller, Hegarty & Abele, 2012).
...or a relationship”. In genderlects, there is no superior or inferior method of communication, but rather, men and women just communicate differently. By understanding these differences, one can reduce the amount of misunderstandings in future conversations.
What if people were executed for a crime they did not commit? It is a very sad but realistic scenario. Innocent lives that are lost are a necessary risk to the government to allow the death penalty to be sought. People put their faith in a government that can one day find them guilty of a crime they may or may not have committed and execute them for it. This is one of the many problems that arise with allowing the death penalty to be used as a form of punishment. Executions have changed drastically over the years by making it non constitutional to execute minors and the mentally disabled, yet many mentally challenged people are still executed today. It is also not a solution to the problem people face with the unjust criminal justice system and the problem with crime people continue to face. The death penalty is far from beneficial to society as it is inhumane and ineffective.
...man”’ (pg. 19). This quote is true for all men American or Indian. Indian men, from what I have seen, feel very frustrated when people tell them what to do because it makes them feel as if they are not smart and childish.
The book An Intorduction of Sociolinguistics is an outstanding introductary book in the field of sociolinguistics. It encompasses a wide range of language issues. In chapter 13, Wardhaugh provides a good insight to the relationship between language and gender. He explains gender differences of language-in-use with concise examples. Wardhaugh riases questions about sexist language and guides readers to look closer at how people use language differently because of their own gender in daily life. According to the Whorfian hypothesis, which indicates that the way people use language reflects their thoughts, different genders adapt different communication strategies.