Free Affirmative Action Essays - I'm White, Angry, and Against Affirmative Action


Length: 1265 words (3.6 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Excellent
Open Document
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document



I'm White, Angry, and Against Affirmative Action

 

        Papers are piling up on top of a desk.  People are running around

trying to meet their deadlines.  Assignments are being pushed back to later

dates.  Phones are being answered, but put on hold for the next available

representatives.  The president of the firm puts out a notice of hire.  The

word is spread throughout the business community through the newspaper and

the internet.  Resumes are received every business day.  The board members

of the firm review hundreds of resumes that are received daily.  They rate

the applications according to qualifications and experiences.  The names

are disregarded at this point.  A dozen of the applicants are chosen, and

notified to setup initial interviews.  One applicant meets all the

qualifications, and has had numerous experiences in the field.  This

applicant clearly surpasses all the other applicants.  The commitee is very

impressed by this young man.  He heads home in delight, hoping to hear from

the marketing firm again.  Unfortunately, he never hears from

 them again.  The main reason why  he was not chosen, was because of the

color of his skin.  Since he is Asian, they could not hire him, because 50%

of their employees are Asian.  Under the affirmative action, they must

employ someone who is underrepresented.  This type of situation happens

often.  It is not the qualifications, but the color of the skin that

employers look for today.  Affirmative action is a step backwards.  We are

back to color and race differences.  We are all Americans and should be

treated as so, not what ethnicity we are.  Affirmative action should be

abolished solely because we do not want to make the same mistake our

society made in the past --- discriminate according to color.  Two wrongs

do not make a right.

 

      Many people say that we should keep affirmative action to render

fairness to the minorities because of the wrongs that was once put on to

them.  This simply does not make sense.  To compensate someone, a person

must have gone through an experience.  People today did not go through such

discrimination, as their past ancestors.  How can we punish someone for

what they had no control?  Our white society today did not commit the

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Free Affirmative Action Essays - I'm White, Angry, and Against Affirmative Action." 123HelpMe.com. 28 May 2017
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=16917>.
Title Length Color Rating  
The Affirmative Action Debate Essay example - The Affirmative Action Debate   Most Americans desire a colorblind society. A society where individuals are judged upon merit, as opposed to the color of their skin. That is the reason Affirmative Action was birthed by Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964. That is also the reason that Proposition 209 was voted for in 1996.  These two historical events are driven by the desire of equality.         What is Affirmative Action?  According to Geraldine Leshin, it is "Taking positive or active steps to accomplish the public policy goal of equal employment opportunity."   What is Proposition 209?  Its a new law that has been passed that "prohibits the state of California and local governments from dis...   [tags: affirmative action argumentative persuasive]
:: 18 Works Cited
1760 words
(5 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
The Success of Twelve Angry Men as a Thriller Essay - The Success of Twelve Angry Men as a Thriller ‘Twelve Angry Men’ is a gripping thriller despite the limitations of the film. The black and white 1957 film is packed with suspense even though the film has many restrictions in it. These limitations are things such the setting, the action/special effects, the props, the lack of costume changes, the cast are all twelve middle aged unattractive white men and finally the plot of the film is quite dull and uninteresting. Regardless of these limitations the director, Sidney Lumet, still makes it an exciting thriller by focusing the film on interesting memorable characters with different personalities and back grounds....   [tags: Papers] 1318 words
(3.8 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Affirmative Action Essay - The first website, http://www.infoplease.com/spot/affirmative1.html, discussed the history and timeline of affirmative action. The first discussion of affirmative action was in Executive Order 10925 on March 6, 1961. President Johnson introduced this policy as a method of redressing discrimination that continued even with the civil rights laws and constitutional guarantees. Affirmative action was enforced for the first time on September 24, 1965. The focus of this policy was to make sure active measures were being taken to give blacks and other minorities the same opportunities for promotions, raises, scholarships, school admissions and financial aid that whites enjoyed....   [tags: essays research papers] 407 words
(1.2 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on Affirmative Action Curbed in California - LOS ANGELES, JUNE 1 – California Gov. Pete Wilson (R), vowing to lead a growing conservative movement to end three decades of racial and gender preferences as an antidote to discrimination, today signed an executive order abolishing a wide range of affirmative action programs affecting hiring and contracting in state agencies. Wilson, who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination, eliminated or sharply cut back scores of affirmative action policies or programs that are not mandated by state or federal laws or that exceed those laws....   [tags: essays research papers] 975 words
(2.8 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on Affirmative Action is Reverse Discrimination - Affirmative Action is Reverse Discrimination Even though slavery has not been a part of America for over a century now, racial discrimination still exists in various parts of our culture. A controversial policy known as affirmative action was introduced in the 1960's to try and promote racial equality in society. Affirmative action is supposed to give minorities an equal chance in life by requiring minority employment, promotions, college acceptance, etc. At first this sounds like a perfect solution to racial discrimination, but in reality it is discrimination in reverse....   [tags: Papers] 1812 words
(5.2 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Affirmative Action Essay - The roots of Affirmative Action can be traced back to the passage of the Civil Rights Act where legislation redefined public and private behavior. The act states that to discriminate in private is legal, but anything regarding business or public discrimination is illegal. There are two instances when opposing affirmative action might seem the wrong thing to do. The nobility of the cause that help others. Affirmative Action was a great starter for equality in the work place. The most promanite variable in deciding Affirmative Action as right or wrong, is whether or not society is going to treat people as groups or individuals....   [tags: essays research papers] 1079 words
(3.1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Affirmative Action Essay - Affirmative Action missing works cited Since the beginning of time there has been prejudice and hate. Adam and Eve hated snakes. Jews hated Jesus. Sugar Ray Leonard hated Tommy Hearns. Prejudice is caused by two things: ignorance and hate. Prejudice and mistreatment has existed in this country, first with American-Indians and then later with African-Americans and many other minorities. The selling and trading of slaves is a shadow that has been hanging over the heads of white Americans for two centuries....   [tags: essays research papers] 3178 words
(9.1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Affirmative Action is Discrimination in a New Form Essay - Affirmative Action - Discrimination in a New Form   The roots of affirmative action can be traced back to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act where legislation redefined public and private behavior. The act states that to discriminate in private is legal, but anything regarding business or public discrimination is illegal ("Affirmative" 13). There are two instances when opposing affirmative action might seem the wrong thing to do. Even these two cases don't justify the use of affirmative action....   [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Topics] 1764 words
(5 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Essay on Abolishing Affirmative Action - Affirmative action is a policy or a program of giving certain preferences to certain (usually under-represented) groups. This typically focuses on education, employment, government contracts, health care, or social welfare. There is much debate concerning claims that it fails to achieve its desired goal, and that it has unintended and undesirable side-effects. There are also claims that the practice is itself racist or sexist Affirmative action began as a corrective measure for governmental and social injustices against demographic groups that have been subjected to prejudice....   [tags: Argumentative Persuasive] 1889 words
(5.4 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
12 Angry Men Essay - Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves. Within this heterogynous group are a dozen different personalities - some of which were leaders and most of which were not. The strongest leader in this movie by far is the Architect in the White Suit. Right off from the beginning at the original vote the Architect stated clearly his position in the matter....   [tags: 12 Angry Men, movie, film] 1444 words
(4.1 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]

Related Searches





wrongs that were committed a generation ago.  We should not punish them,

but rather treat everyone fairly.  We should treat everyone as Americans.

As Bakke quotes the Constitution,

 

 "...The guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment extend to all persons.

It's language is explicit:  "No State shall... deny to any person within

its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."  It is settled beyond

question that the rights created by the first section of the Fourteenth

Amendment are, by its terms, guaranteed to the individual." (Bakke, p.485)

 

In the past, we were fighting to abolish racial separation, but today, we

have affirmative action, which still brings about the separation of the

different races.  We should fight for equality for all.  Affirmative action

affects everyone, including our children.

      Under the affirmative action law, our schools are currently

recruiting students according to race and color.  According to a critic on

affirmative action,

 

 "A college board survey, described in Andrew Hacker's Two Nations, in 1992

the average combined SAT score for black students whose parents earn more

than $70,000 a year was 854, which was twenty-five points lower than the

average SAT for white students whose parents earn less than $20,000 a

year." (Rosen, p.3)

 

        In effect, the solution by supporters of affirmative action is to

lower the school's standards so that they can accept a more diverse group

of students.  This solution is ridiculous, simply because everyone has a

chance to do good.  It is just a matter of effort.  If a student is spoiled,

and does not realize how important an education is, he will not study as

hard as someone who has been brought up with education as their number one

goal.  Family incomes have less to do with SAT scores than the efforts

students put into their studies.  We should not lower our standards.

Instead, all students should raise their own standards in order to improve

our society.  For example, the University of California in Berkeley has a

diverse student body with a majority of Asians.  An Asian student coming

out of high school with a 4.0 GPA, and  a list of extra curricular

activities would not be accepted simply because of his ethnicity.  Instead

the school would rather accept a Mexican student with a 3.0 GPA.  Why

should the student who did not study as hard be rewarded just because of

his race?  Nobody has the choice of ethnicity when they are born, so we

should not deprive anyone when they make the effort.  Affirmative action

also brings about different standards in grading.

 

      The National Merit Scholarship has one standard for African

Americans, and one for the rest of the applicants.  This type of double

standards is absurd, because black students are not graded any differently

in the classroom.  This also implies that black students are not capable of

handling the same material as the rest of the Americans are.  This double

standard, in itself, is an insult to the black community.   There are many

black people who want to be treated equally, without any special assistance.

 By giving minorities special treatment, we are simultaneously insulting

them by implying they are of a lower class.  As Judge O'Connor of Richmond

county states,

 

"Classifications based on race carry a danger of stigmatic harm.  Unless

they are strictly reserved for remedial settings, they may in fact promote

notions of racial inferiority and lead to a politics of racial hostility.

We thus reaffirm the view expressed by the plurality in Wygant that the

standard of review under the Equal Protection Clause is not dependent on

the race of those burdened or benefited by a particular classification."

(O'Connor, p.500)

 

We do not want to cause any more hostility than there already is in our

society by imposing special standards.  Our goal is to promote unity in our

society, not separation.  This also affects the efficiency in our workforce.

 

      In the work place, people hired under special assistance may slow

the process.  If someone was hired over another simply because of the color

of  his skin, and not by his qualifications, the business loses as well.

They must pay someone the same salary they would have paid a more efficient

employee.  Lowering standards in the workplace, to accommodate a race, is a

step back to poorly made products.  In the 1980's, American cars were

marked with a distinction of poor quality.  Since then, our cars have

vastly improved, but the distinction is still planted in many people's

minds.  If we lower our standards in the white collar force, we may develop

the same distinction in our corporate businesses as we have in our cars.

Another point is that many people say that affirmative action will bring

diversity to our workforce.  A projection done by the San Jose Tribune

suggests that by the year 2000, white males will make up only 10% of new

hires.  This does not promote diversity, rather reverse discrimination.

 

      To have a unified and peaceful society, we must move away from the

separation of color lines.  We moved forward when we abolished segregation,

but we are now moving back by imposing Affirmative action.  This is not the

way to solve anything.  Affirmative action will just cause more hostility

between races, which in turn, can lead to hatred.


Return to 123HelpMe.com