Marcus Brutus as the Tragic Hero in Julius Caesar

528 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: characteristics of a villain in literature

Marcus Brutus as the Tragic Hero in Julius Caesar There is no such thing as the perfect person. We may dream of such a person, but sadly, everyone has flaws. These flaws are what make us human. Something else that makes us human is our need for heroes. We attribute 'perfect' qualities to our heroes. In reality even our heroes are flawed. The closest thing to the idealized person, or hero, is the Shakespearean tragic hero. The tragic hero is someone of high standing, good character, and a flaw. While it may be only one flaw, it is often fatal. An example of a tragic hero can be best seen in William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar. Marcus Brutus is a prominent leader and noble citizen of Rome who leads in the assassination of Julius Caesar. We see that Brutus plays the role of the tragic hero through his noble standing, fatal flaw, and legacy. Marcus Brutus is of noble standing which adds to his appeal as a tragic hero. At one point Cassius says "'Brutus' and 'Caesar.' What is so special about the name 'Caesar'........... yours sounds as good." ( ) This indicates that Brutus is held in the same esteem as Julius Caesar. Most tragic heroes are of high standing because they are easily recognizable. Tragic heroes are usually portrayed as prominent social figures so when they fall they fall harder. Brutus's fatal flaw is his trustworthy nature. He joins the conspiracy not because he "loved Caesar less but loved Rome more." ( ) Brutus joins the conspiracy under the impression that he is preventing Caesar's tyranny and saving the people of Rome. He also trusts the motives of the other conspirators. In entering the conspiracy he is also responsible for the death of Caesar and the movement of the plot. The civil war is a direct result of Caesar's assassination and eventually Brutus's own death. Brutus's fall is definitely caused by his trustworthy nature. Through his legacy Brutus leaves the world an important lesson. Marc Antony remembers Brutus as "the noblest Roman of them all."( ) Despite his death and loss in the war, Brutus is still remembered as noble, in this he represents the moral of the play.

Show More
Related

  • Toni Cade Bambara's The Lesson

    1252 Words  | 3 Pages

    Miss Moore climbed up against the odds in a time where it was almost unheard of for a black woman to go to college. She was a role model for the children who encourages them to get more out of life. This made Miss Moore an exceptional spectacle as most children would likely, “. . . go to the pool or to the show where is cool” (Bambara), however Sylvia and sugar were being forced to meet with Miss More by their parents. From the parent’s point of view, “. . . it was only right that she should take responsibility for the young ones’ education” (Bambara). The parents themselves realize this was very important for their children, but they did not necessarily take their own advice and at times failed to meet some of their own obligations for the children.—Parents who lived in poverty stricken neighborhoods were not always the best role models they could be for their children to discourage

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis Of Mommy There's A Nigger At The Door

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    This made the author dislike and have hatred towards the parents of his fellow classmates for instilling the white supremacy attitude and mind-set that they had. It wasn’t possible they felt this way on their own because honestly growing up children don’t see color they just see other kids to play with. So this must have meant that the parents were teaching their children that they were better and above others because there skin was

    Read More

  • An Inspector Calls by J.B. Priestley

    1587 Words  | 4 Pages

    Gerald Croft is a young business man. He has a good steady job, a fiancée, a promising future and is financially stable. In 'An Inspector Calls' Gerald is described as "an attractive chap, about thirty". His father owns a company called 'Crofts Limited' who are friendly rivals of the Arthur Birling's business 'Birling and Company', although the Croft's business is both older and bigger than the Birling's. Arthur is very pleased about his daughter Sheila's engagement to Gerald, because of the possibility of the two businesses merging ultimately benefiting the Birling's financial status and power. Though Gerald's parents are not as happy with the prospect of their son marrying Sheila, as they feel she is not good enough for Gerald.

    Read More

  • White Teacher by Vivian Gussin Paley

    818 Words  | 2 Pages

    This passage bothered me. It is probably the part that bugged me the most about this book. There are many African Americans who are better behaved, smarter, more artistic, more athletic, etc. then white children. There are also many African Americans who are less educated and more poorly behaved than white children, but the same for both of these things go with white children. It bothers me that she knows that if the worst child in the class was white she wouldn't care if the best child in the class was white. I think that throughout the book she often generalizes with African Americans and doesn't even realize it. She claims that she is getting better, but I don't think that she really is. She keeps trying to have the African American children become the same as the white children.

    Read More

  • My Side of the Mountain by Jean Craighead George

    2444 Words  | 5 Pages

    This book is told from the diary of the main character, Sam Gribley. Sam is a boy full of determination. He didn’t give up and go home like everyone thought he would. He is strong of mind. After the first night in the freezing rain, with no fire and no food, he still went on. He is a born survivor. He lasted the winter, through storms, hunger, and loneliness, and came out on top even when everyone expected him to fail. “The land is no place for a Gribley” p. 9

    Read More

  • Brutus: A True Tragic Hero

    978 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...tus truly defined the definition of being a tragic hero. He took a drastic fall from being high standing Roman senator to committing suicide on the battle field. He also had several fundamental character flaws that defined not only his future but it also defined history as we know it today. His illogical thinking allowed him to justify the killing of Caesar; and his kindness allows Mark Antony to live and become a mighty ruler of Rome. Brutus’ finally has a revelation and his eyes are opened once he is defeated on the battle field during The Battle Philippi. Brutus’ participation in the assassination of Caesar defined his life and the lives of those around him; it also affected the way we look at history today. Without his involvement in the conspiracy the Roman Empire would not have been the same. Brutus’ name will forever be affiliated with the death of Caesar.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Shakespeare’s Marcus Brutus to Other Tragic Heroes

    1388 Words  | 3 Pages

    The tragic hero is one of literatures most used (and sometimes abused) characters. The classical definition of a tragic hero is, “a person with heroic or potentially heroic qualities. The person is doomed by the Gods or some other supernatural force to destruction or suffering. The hero struggles against the fate, but due to a personal flaw, ultimately fails in the battle against fate. It is my personal opinion that Brutus,as he is portrayed in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, is a tragic hero by this definition. I came to this conclusion due to the fact that Brutus shares many similarities with other tragic heroes in literature such as Oedipus, Hamlet, and Ralph from Lord of the Flies. All four characters share the two critical traits that are needed to be tragic heroes: a tragic flaw that eventually leads to a tragic downfall. The tragic hero was defined by Aristotle, yet the “invention” of the tragic hero goes to Sophocles.

    Read More

  • Why Are All The Black Kids Sitting Together In The Cafeteria Summary

    543 Words  | 2 Pages

    Beverly Daniel Tatum wrote an essay in 1997 titled Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?, regarding racial boundaries and how black people tend to isolate themselves from Whites. She begins by stating that puberty causes children to question their ethnical background. Some research shows that colored adults are more interested in the exploration of their backgrounds than white adults (Tatum 214). The way people view themselves is idealized from the way others speak and act around them. Tatum also explains how many stereotypes of Blacks versus Whites exist. In schools, most teachers aren't necessarily racist, but they have ideas in their head of what black people are known for or everything they have done wrong. White people do wrong things too, and those students aren't

    Read More

  • Where The Red Corn Grows Analysis

    614 Words  | 2 Pages

    Billy travels to town all by himself through the Ozark mountains. He arrives at the depot very nervous to get his dogs. Billy cannot move as he is shocked to finally get them. As two pups start his way, Billy is overjoyed. One of his pups is a boy and the other is a girl. Billy and his dogs journey back home and the little boy pup gets the courage to bark at a mountain lion. The boy is very belligerent and the girl seems to be smarter and more careful. As Billy is approaching home, he sees two names carved into a tree: Dan and Ann. He decides to name them Little Ann and Old Dan.

    Read More

  • Wahlert Behavior

    570 Words  | 2 Pages

    As four, little, white Wahlert girls trot into our new college class, we came to an odd sight that we had yet to see in our eighteen years. A classroom full of black people. Going to catholic schools our whole life, I have generously seen a total of ten in a school environment. We almost cautiously walk to our seats. As class continues more show up late and a few argue back with the teacher. We sat back and gave judging looks and I thought to myself this kind of behavior wouldn't ever be acceptable at wahlert. Our first assignment of the day was to talk with someone we have never met before in order to conduct a solid introduction and conclusion to their lives. That is where Crystal came in and she revealed to me a perfect example of you can't judge a book by its cover.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Thomas King's 'The Inconvenient Indian'

    918 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Thomas King’s novel, The Inconvenient Indian, the story of North America’s history is discussed from his original viewpoint and perspective. In his first chapter, “Forgetting Columbus,” he voices his opinion about how he feel towards the way white people have told America’s history and portraying it as an adventurous tale of triumph, strength and freedom. King hunts down the evidence needed to reveal more facts on the controversial relationship between the whites and natives and how it has affected the culture of Americans. Mainly untangling the confusion between the idea of Native Americans being savages and whites constantly reigning in glory. He exposes the truth about how Native Americans were treated and how their actual stories were

    Read More

  • American History in the book White Devil

    1239 Words  | 3 Pages

    To summarize the book into a few paragraphs doesn't due it the justice it deserves. The beginning details of the French and Ind...

    Read More

  • Who Moved My Cheese? by Spencer Johnson

    1888 Words  | 4 Pages

    Who Moved My Cheese?, by Spencer Johnson, is a parable that shows how individuals deal with change differently. In this story the four characters, two mice named Sniff and Scurry and two little people, about the size of mice, named Hem and Haw. These four are in a maze searching for cheese; the cheese is a metaphor for the things that make feel complete. The maze represents the environment such as the earth, employment, home, family, or whatever is associated with the change.

    Read More

  • The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar - Tragic Hero

    488 Words  | 1 Pages

    Caesar and Brutus were truly noble people. Caesar was a dignified and courageous man. He gained his power through hard work and courage. However, Caesar was marked by a weakness: he wanted too much power. This weakness proved to be fatal in the play. Brutus, on the other hand, was a strong leader throughout the whole play. People listened to him easily and he showed his nobility by always being open to others. Despite his good character, he did make one fatal mistake in judgment. He killed Caesar thinking he would gain too much power, yet it was truly his friend Cassius’s jealously of Caesar that truly snared him into the conspiracy.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar: Who is the Better Tragic Hero, Caesar or Brutus?

    1455 Words  | 3 Pages

    As you can see people are in a huge fuss over who is the tragic hero Julius Caesar of Marcus Brutus. They both meet the criteria of a tragic hero which is: a tragic hero as a character of great reputation and prosperity whose misfortune is not due to depravity or vice, for the hero is a virtuous man or woman but to an error in judgment resulting from a tragic flaw, but Brutus continues to be the superior of the two. Many people argue over which the better hero is Caesar or Brutus. My opinion is Marcus Brutus wins hands down, a descendant of a wealthy family a strong well developed character, with the ability to persuade others these qualities make him my favorite tragic hero.

    Read More

More about Marcus Brutus as the Tragic Hero in Julius Caesar

Open Document