Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
titration practical writeup
practical chemistry titration
practical on titration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: titration practical writeup
Titration Practical Planning assessment The apparatus to be used: · Beaker · 250cm 3 volumetric flask · Funnel · Burette · Pipette · White tile · Conical Flask · Balance · Spatula · Weighing bottle · Glass rod Method Making a standard solution: A weighing bottle was accurately weighed and approximately 5g of anhydrous sodium carbonate was added and the weight of the bottle plus the solid recorded. The anhydrous sodium carbonate was then transferred into a 100cm3 clean beaker. The bottle was carefully rinsed out two or three times with water and the washings were transferred to the beaker each time. About 25cm3 of water was poured into the beaker and stirred with a glass rod until the solid had completely dissolved. This solution was then added to a 250cm3 volumetric flask using a funnel. The beaker and funnel were swilled thoroughly using a small amount of water these washing were then added to the volumetric flask. Water was then added to the volumetric flask until it was about 1cm below the graduation mark. The water was then added slowly from a clean pipette so that at eye level the bottom of the meniscus was just touching the graduation mark. The volumetric flask was then stoppered and then inverted. Carrying out a titration: A conical flask was swilled out with water and a pipette and pipette filler were used to withdraw 25.0cm3 of the sodium carbonate solution from the volumetric flask and transfer it to the conical flask. A burette was first swilled with sulphuric (VI) acid using a clean, dry beaker and a funnel and then filled to below the zero mark. A little of the solution was then run out of the burette into the beaker and the funnel removed. A white tile was then placed underneath the conical flask and a few drops of the indicator methyl orange was added to the sodium carbonate solution.
At this point the identity of the unknown compound was hypothesized to be calcium nitrate. In order to test this hypothesis, both the unknown compound and known compound were reacted with five different compounds and the results of those reactions were compared. It was important to compare the known and unknown compounds quantitatively as well to ensure that they were indeed the same compound. This was accomplished by reacting them both with a third compound which would produce an insoluble salt that could be filte...
We used the pipette filler and filled the glucose rinsed pipette to add 10ml of 10% of glucose in test tube 0.
Put the amount of 0.1M cobalt (II) chloride hexahydrate that fills the end of a spatula into a test tube. Then add 2mL of 95% ethanol. Tap the end of the test tube to mix the solution and record the pertinent data in section 1 of the Data Table. Discard the solution in the appropriate container as directed to you by your lab instructor.
The mixture was combined with saturated sodium chloride, and the aqueous layer, containing alcohol, some acid, and water, was discarded. The organic layer was then dried with granular anhydrous sodium sulfate; this drying agent is used to absorb any water in a solution and should thus, result in a colorless solution. The final product was collected; it was mostly clear, though it has a pale yellow tint. Data Table 2 shows the results and calculations that were gathered after the completion of this experiment. No errors had occurred during the course of the experiment, which is testified by the fairly, high yield of
A titration curve is a plot of pH of the analyte solution versus volume of titrant added, as the titration progresses. 9,12 The equivalence point is the inflection point of a titration curve.9
The equation shows how 1 mol of Na2CO3 reacts with 1 mol of H2SO4, so
ΔH2 released only 74.24 kilojoules of energy per mole, which is half when compared to the 144.79 kilojoules per mole that was released when the first and third reaction was summated. Although the algebraic sum of equation of 1 and equation 3 is equation 2, and the summated change in enthalpy per mole are drastically different, appearing to contradict Hess’s Law, this conclusion changes once limiting reagents are considered.
The purpose of this lab was to extract chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments from fresh spinach leaves and separate and analyze these pigments using column chromatography and thin layer chromatography. Acetone was used as a polar solvent to dissolve the more polar pigments first (Xanthophylls, chlorophylls), while hexane was used as a nonpolar solvent to dissolve the more nonpolar pigments such as the carotenes. In addition to being used as the polar solvent, acetone was used to remove the spinach components that were not pigments such as cellulose which is insoluble. The column chromatography worked by eluting the nonpolar carotene pigments first because the alumina is polar and doesn’t absorb the nonpolar carotene. The polar components such
The purpose of this experiment is to learn how to use fractional distillation to separate a mix of isopropyl acetate and toluene, redistill them, and use gas chromatography to examine the separation.
The Purpose of the Chemical Reaction Lab was to examine and measure the chemical reaction of H-C-L, hydrochloric acid and CuCl2, Copper chloride solution to determine different types of reactions, within specific elements and compounds; Aluminum foil, Al aluminum shot, Ammonium hydroxide, Magnesium, Silver nitrate, Sodium carbonate, Sodium bicarbonate, Sodium hydroxide, and Zinc. By completing the trials, the data displayed chemical changes. These changes were observable in changes of substances, such as formation of precipitate, change in color, release of gas, and difference of temperature.
A knot was tied about one inch from the end of the dialysis tubes. Then, three graduated cylinders were filled with twenty millimeters of either distilled water, 0.5 M sucrose, or 1.0 M sucrose. Using a funnel, each solute was poured into the corresponding dialysis tube. To keep the solute from leaking, another knot was tied about one inch of the opposite end. As the knot was tied, two fingers were used to remove air bubbles from the bag. Subsequently, each bag was rinsed with distilled water to assure that there was no sucrose residue, and then dried off with a paper towel. After waiting for a scale to display zero grams, each bag was then coiled on top of the scale to identify the mass in grams. The initial mass was recorded. Three containers were gathered and filled approximately two-thirds full with distilled water. Then, the three dialysis tubes were immersed into the corresponding container to soak in the distilled water for twenty minutes. To find the mass of the bags after being soaked in water, the bags were dried with a paper towel, and then coiled on top of the scale once again. The final mass was recorded. Finally, the mass difference and the percent change in mass was calculated and
According to (Khan): A complexometric titration as defined by IUPAC as a volumetric titration where a soluble complex can be formed by titrating a metal ion with a ligand in an aqueous solution and a titrant is one of the reacts used in the titration. [4]
The sample was subjected to steam distillation as illustrated in Figure 1. A total of 50ml of distillate was collected while recording the temperature for every 5.0 ml of distillate. The distillate was transferred into a 250ml Erlenmeyer flask and 3.0 g of NaCl was added. The flask was cooled and the content was transferred into a 250-ml separatory funnel. Then 25.0ml of hexane was added and the mixture was shaken for 5 minutes with occasional venting. The aqueous layer was discarded and the organic layer was left inside. About 25.0ml of 10% NaOH was then added and the mixture was shaken as before. The aqueous layer was collected and then cooled in an ice bath. It was then acidified with enough 6.00 M HCl while the pH is being monitored with red litmus paper. Another 25.0 ml of hexane was added and the mixture was shaken as before. The hexane extract was saved and a small amount of anhydrous sodium sulfate was added. The mixture was then swirled for a couple of minutes then filtered. A small amount of the final extracted was tested separately with 1% FeCl3 and Bayer’s reagent.
Titration is a technological process in which a solution, known as a titrant, is slowly and carefully added from a burrette into a fixed volume of another solution (known as the sample). In an acid-base titration an acid neutralizes a base or vice versa. This process is maintained untill the reaction between the titrant and the sample (acid and the base) is judged to be complete. The reaction is judged to be complete when the endpoint is reached. An endpoint in a titration analysis is referred to as the point at which no more titrant is added due to an observable colour change of an indicator. Indicators can be used to find an endpoint because they change colour when the pH of a solution changes and an endpoint in a titration is an empirical approximation of the equivalence point, which is the point of major pH change in the titration sample due to the fact that equal chemical amounts of reactants have been combined at that point. All indicators have a pH range, which is the range of pH values at which the colour of the indicator changes. Thus
In this experiment three different equations were used and they are the Stoichiometry of Titration Reaction, Converting mL to L, and Calculating the Molarity of NaOH and HCl (Lab Guide pg. 142 and 143).