Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
genres of movies essay
genres of movies essay
genres of movies essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: genres of movies essay
Film and Broadcast Fiction
There are many different ways in which film narratives appeal to their
audiences. Film narratives explore various elements, which make it
appeal to their audiences. The two main texts that are going examined
are Chocolat and Phone Booth.
Chocolat is directed by Lasse Hallstrom and was released in 2000.
Phone Booth is directed by Joel Schumacher and wad released in 2002.
Phone Booth" is all about Stu (Farrell) who is held captive at gun
point in a phone booth by a sniper (Sutherland) dictating his demands
from a phone from somewhere in the surrounding buildings, who is
trying to teach him a lesson. It is an intense, high-energy action
drama. Chocolat, on the other hand is about a woman and her daughter
who open a chocolate shop in a small French village that shakes up the
morality of the community. The films Phone Booth and Chocolat do not
have very much in common. They both appeal to dissimilar audiences, as
they have certain elements in the film that target only certain
audiences. The genre for Phone Booth is action, high drama and has
some violence. However, Chocolat is a fairly tale story and is rather
more character driven. The genre for this film is romance, comedy and
drama.
Chocolat’s naaraitve appeals to its audience because it tells its
story in a certain style, which keeps it audience engaged. At the
start of the narrative there is an equilibrium and balance. In this
case there is a traditional town in which people follow a normal
routinely life. The towns people are very religious and believe in
tranquillity. However, this equilibrium and balance is disrupted to
make the narrative rather more interesting. The character Vienne and
her daughter arrive in the village and bring with them a change to the
town. She does not fit in with the town’s people. She is independent
and is more passionate about life. She dresses in a different way and
talks with experience. Compared to her the town people are more merged
Most people are likely to relate Hollywood with money. If a person lives in the Hollywood area, people assume she or he is probably rich. If she or he is a Hollywood movie star, the person probably makes a lot of money. Therefore, to follow that line of thought, when Hollywood producers make a movie, they make it just for money. And some filmmakers do seem to make films only for the money the movies will earn. The action movie "Die Hard", the fantasy movie "Star Wars", and the adventure movie "Jurassic Park" are examples of exciting movies that were made just for the money by satisfying the audiences' appetite for escapism.
Film makers use many historical events to spark up and idea for a movie. One historical event that is commonly used is war. One advantage a film maker has when using war as a movie plot is that there is already a lot of drama in war. This may seem like a good advantage for the film maker, however focusing on all of the drama of war leaves much of the actual info. When watching a war movie, you may feel like you have an understanding about the war, but when you really compare a war movie to an actual war you find that there is a lot of factual information left out. One may ask why would directors and film makers leave out the facts of war and focus on the drama? After reading The Faces of Battle by John Keegan and reviewing war movies such as Saving Private Ryan, and Pearl Harbor, one can clearly see what makes the Hollywood version of war different from real life war.
Mark Robberds’ 1995 Article "The New Historicist Creepers of Vineland" is an insightful look into how Thomas Pynchon’s 1990 novel fits the new historicist criteria of Michel Foucault, Stephen Greenblatt, and other new historicists. He convincingly argues for the "vinelike" characteristics of the novel, and shows how it is "genealogical in structure and archeological in content" (Robberds 238). What Robberds means is that Vineland is a complex narrative with more characters than a three-part miniseries. The book, which opens in 1984, is set as much in the sixties as in the eighties. After meeting each character, we are treated to their history and interaction with other characters over the previous fifteen to fifty years, in some cases tracing back to their parents and grandparents. All this personal and cultural history fits into Robberds’ definition of Foucault’s new historicism nicely, but Robberds seems so eager to fit Vineland into this box that he misses one of the true pleasures of reading Pynchon.
The invention of television affected filmmaking in America financially by a great decrease in audience attendance due to movie goers choosing to watch TV in their own home. Amid the 1950’s, specific elements were employed by the film industry to bring the audience back to the movie theater such as film innovations, marketing gimmicks and adult-themed movies. In order to compete with television, the production code changed as film studios began releasing films to theaters that would show films that were not approved by the Production Code Administration (PCA). American cultural and social tensions were reflected in films of this time as risqué topics were being more openly discussed instead of being swept under the carpet.
Before the Second World War began Hollywood’s purpose lied within entertainment for the American people. After the war started, the main focus shifted to wartime propaganda. Film was used to display the war in a way that did not show its true colors—including the censorship of soldier causalities and other negative connotations that are a simple fact of war. There was even a time in which some actors became better known to America than politians. Through films, Hollywood began to make a statement of their anti-Nazi beliefs. They began to make motion pictures for American recruitment into the Army as well as many that supported the war effort, and intended to make other Americans more aware of the war’s effect on the United States, and how people can get involved. Many European countries banned these Hollywood films, as they began to affect not only America but many other countries that were involved in the war as well.
Even though Troy may seem like a real city, it may or may not be because of many reasons such as scholars agree that Troy really existed, the real method of Troy’s destruction is unknown, and Troy may not have even been desTroyed by the greeks according to “Is Troy True? The Evidence Behind Movie Myth” by Stefan Lovgren. Troy is the legendary city where the book, The Iliad, by Homer takes place.To begin, scholars agree that Troy really existed.In the text, it states, “But most scholars agree that Troy itself was no imaginary Shangri-la but a real city, and that the Trojan War indeed happened” (Lovgren 1). This shows that Troy really existed because of the archaeological evidence.Furthermore, the real method of Troy's destruction is unknown.In
Barthes, a 20th century literary critic, are the basis for the dilemma posed by the
In Hollywood, many filmmakers portray a distorted view of the Internet. Filmmakers do this by giving out misinformation on topics (i.e. Sharks-Jaws, Internet-The Net) that the public knows little about. When people know little about a specific topic, they begin to fear that issue. People fear the movie because they shut down their brain and tune into their senses, completely letting go of common knowledge. The public does not like to think about the movie. Not only does the filmmaker present the public with deceitful lies but they also capitalize on the net as a central problem, which is another regard to the misrepresentation of the Internet.
Hollywood is known for changing details of historical events in movies. Sometimes preserving historical accuracy is simply too complicated, unimportant, or confusing to replicate. The Eagle is a prime example of this, as there are many examples of details that had to be changed due to the aforementioned constraints. However, there are also many facets of the movie that do abide to the events in history – or at least do so well enough to not be an issue. In The Eagle, the events that exemplify such accuracies and inaccuracies are: the purpose of the Hadrian’s Wall, the utilization of the Roman Salute, and the notion of a “thumbs down” signifying death for a Roman gladiator.
been on air for a long time, and has passed its 200th episode last season. The
“Types of films are commonly referred to as genres (pronounced “zahn-rahz”). The word genre is originally French and simply means kind or type.” (Bordwell & Thompson, 2004: 108). Genre groups films, which share similar filmic qualities and themes, into various subsections according to the type of film they are associated as.
Social phenomenon is analyzed from different perspectives and at different levels. Sociologists study every specific event from the small social patterns to the large social patterns. The European sociologists have also offered a wide conceptualization of the society’s fundamentals and its workings. Today, there are three major perspectives that offer theoretical paradigms that are commonly used by sociologists. These theoretical approaches aid in explaining the inter-relationship between people and society. They include: the functionalist, the interactionist and the conflict perspectives. Each of these perspectives conceptualizes society, human behavior, and social forces. In this paper, comparison and contrast of these different perspectives with one another is looked into.
Up until recently television has been the most prominent medium of entertainment and information in our lives. Nothing could beat Saturday morning cartoons, the six o'clock news and zoning out from the world by the distractions of prime time sitcoms. It is all of these things and more that formed television into what was thought to be the ultimate entertainment medium, that is, up until now. Television in the twenty-first century is not the television our parents watched or in fact what we watched as children. Today’s generation are no longer satisfied with the traditional television experience. Today’s audience no longer has to follow the network’s predetermined schedule nor is television the one dimensional experience it used to be. Viewers no longer need to schedule a fixed time in order to gather information or watch their favourite show (Smith 5). They can record it with the push of the DVR (Digital Video Recording) button or watch it on a device and obtain background information via the Internet. In addition, viewers now have the opportunity to interact with, share, and produce their own material from their favourite show (5). In order to not lose the authenticity of television, media theorists have created transmedia. This new twist on television gives the user more control and more involvement than ever before. The concept has been termed as transmedia storytelling. The online journal Infoline defines transmedia storytelling in its January 2014 issue as “social, mobile, accessible and re-playable.” Originally coined in the 1990’s it was not until 2003 when Henry Jenkins, a professor of communications at the University of Southern California, wrote his article “Transmedia Storytelling” that the term began being ...
The film industry has become a large part of part of human culture for over a millennium. Since the development of the motion picture camera in the 1890s, shortly followed by the establishment of production companies, film has vastly gained popularity. While there are many different reasons of the existence of films, one of the main purposes is to convey a message to the viewer. Climate change and the environment is a frequently discussed topic in films. This essay will discuss three common facts and fallacies found in popular movie culture by comparison of peer reviewed journals.
Television and journalism have a relatively short history together, yet over the last sixty years, the two have become increasingly intertwined, perhaps even irreversible so. But this merger is between two opposing forces–one, a mass medium that inherently demands entertainment and the other, a profession most people hold responsible for information, for facts, which, for the most part, are inherently boring. So has television been beneficial for the American people? The people that our country’s founding fathers chose to hold responsible for electing those to be responsible for our country’s government? By exploring the history of television journalism, discovering how it came to be, and looking at current trends in the industry, I only hope to be able to give my own informed opinion.