Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
role of setting in story
role of setting in story
eassy about the influence of setting in the story
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: role of setting in story
Narration in The Moving Toyshop When a story is being told, there are many facts and details that the narrator needs to put into the story so that the reader understands what is happening. The way that the storyteller gives the facts to the reader is very important. In The Moving Toyshop, Edmund Crispin tells us the necessities of the story in a wonderful way. Instead of stating the facts, he adds the details into parts of the story, which makes the whole story much more interesting to read. When introducing characters, Crispin gives us a complete description while still continuing with the storyline. Crispin also gives us a great sense of setting by telling us of the time and place in a very subtle way. We are able to picture the setting without even knowing that he told it to us. The most surprising thing to notice is the way Crispin builds up his murder mystery. We are given small clues throughout the story but do not know they are there until we reread the book. By setting up the mystery in this way, Crispin makes his book one that the reader cannot put down. His entire way of introducing the characters, settings and mystery make this a very remarkable book. Crispin has a very interesting way of introducing his characters. He throws in facts about them that could be missed if the reader was not paying attention. When describing Cadogan, Crispin does not simply tell us how old he is or what he looks like. We are instead given facts in small parts throughout the story. For example, near the beginning we are told, "Cadogan straightened up with a faint sigh. He felt every month of his thirty-seven years." (Toy 10). This little detail is slipped into the story in a barely noticeable way. By introducing the fact in this way, Crispin makes it seem like part of the story. This way of describing the characters is continued through the entire book. The portrayal of Mr. Hoskins is delivered in a very similar way when Crispin states, "Mr Hoskins, large, raw-boned and melancholy, a little like a Thurber dog, blinked mildly." (Toy 27). From this, we get an immediate mental picture of him. The setting of the narrative is also thrown out at various times throughout the book.
This book is a very interesting read, if you have some self discipline. I mean that you need some self discipline because this book didn’t really captivate me in the sense that I couldn’t put it down. But after reading it for a while, I started to appreciate the author’s way of describing the characters and actions in this book.
Basically the book seems like an out line of the whole story and the book gets
this is one reason why the structure of the book does seem so "loose" - why
The plot of the novel is creatively explained in a way that anyone can visualize through the event...
within the fact that this book has no immediate plot. It is more of a
first some type of mystery, but as we read the ending we realize that it is
book I was greatly troubled by its ending. I can see why it is an excellent novel, but at
How does a writer communicate and engage a reader? Is it by using a lot of details? The author of The Innocent Nihilist used a lot of details. Those details didn't help me understand it any better. I still am confused about what he was trying to communicate to me. Did Lee really dislike his dog? Was he happy when the dog was killed? Or, was Lee just happy that he wasn't the one hit by the car. The author caught my attention initially by his use of dialogue, much as Mike's attention was held by Lee's story. A lot of details were present, but they didn't help me any with this story. Another paper, Martin Luther King, also used details. It told me where Martin Luther King was educated and what some of his religious convictions were, but it failed to reveal the whole man. It didn't develop his character or reveal his passions. The paper had some details, but it fell short of my expectations.
In The Chrysalids, by John Wyndham, the author slowly reveals the setting as a totally invented time and place. First of all, there are hardly any few references to the setting and by the end of chapter one, the readers still know few about where the characters are on a grand scale. For example, the narrator says “the bank coming round in a wide curve, and then running straight... The top of the twigs in a bunch of bushes caught my eye, the branches parted.” Enter here, the author only describes what David can view, the readers are not aware of where they are in our world, if they are in our world, if they are on another planet, or if they live in the future or the past. In addition, the reader needs to read between the lines and put together
The story is set in many countries around the world, it changes between England, the USA, Ireland, and other various parts of Europe.
in the form of the settings on the novel. For example, on page 1 “…and
...if his choice of details was intentional or not he told the story to the point that the reader can feel as if they are apart of it.
...en I began reading this book, I will have to admit that I had a grudge against books of this kind. This is mainly because I was under the impression that books such as The Art of Fiction attempted to tell you how a piece of fiction ought to be written. However, I quickly learned that I was wrong. All this book attempts to do is teach the young writer about fiction and the many ways it can be approached. Furthermore, Gardner encourages the reader to chart his or her own course when it comes to writing fiction and not feel bound by a set of rules, an idea that I agree with wholeheartedly.
This novel was very symbolic and had an extensive vocabulary. It was very intriguing and kept the reader's interest throughout the whole novel. I would recommend this novel to anyone who would like an exercise for his or her mind. There is a lot of insight needed to interpret this novel, but the challenge only adds to the intrigue.
...ch created suspense. Mary Shelly does this many times throughout the book, which creates a struggle for the reader to put the book down.