Privatization of Social Security


Length: 1392 words (4 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Excellent
Open Document
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document



Privatization of Social Security

 

When people lease a car, they pay, knowing that they get something in return. When people pay taxes, they pay, knowing it's the law, and many get some money back. What do people think when they pay social security? Many young people see Social Security as something they are paying but will never get anything in return. What is another way for retirement for the United States?

 

A major topic of retirement talk today often ends up with the new idea of Privatization. Privatization would be a way to retire by means of putting money in your own individual account. It differs from social security because it only goes into separate accounts, not one huge budget. Instead of paying a certain percentage of taxes to Social Security, a separate account would be created for your retirement fund. A percent of your paycheck would still be taken out, but it would be your choice on how much, and no one else could ever touch it, until after your death. You would also be given the opportunity to use this money, and try to double the amount by investing in bonds. Privatization has many benefits, and would be a great help for retirement troubles. It would be a great way for people to leave an inheritence for their families (Tanner, "Saving Social Security is Not Enough").

 

A feeling of frustration is often felt when people [not receiving social security] obtain their paychecks and a large part of their money goes to social security. If they are of certain age, they will never see this money, as the Social Security system in its present form will be bankrupt. The only way to save the Social Security System is a tax increase. In 1998, a general tax increase of 2.2 percent was planned out to aid in social security (Howe). Now, in 2001, it still hasn't taken place. It will take a larger increase now, three years later. The thought is quite terrifying. With the 2.2 percent increase, it was estimated it would cost around seventy five billion dollars to save social security. The 2.2 percent number was given after looking at the "trust funds" for Social Security. However, all that really exists in these funds are IOU's from the nations Department of Treasury (Howe). A 2.2 percent increase is not a viable solution.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Privatization of Social Security." 123HelpMe.com. 25 Jul 2017
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=13096>.
Title Length Color Rating  
The Privatization of Social Security Essay - The Privatization of Social Security Many people don’t understand how the Social Security system really works. There are no separate Social Security "accounts" set up for each taxpayer to which he contributes his Social Security "tax" each year. Many people believe these accounts exist, that the money they pay into their accounts grows each year until retirement, and when they retire they get back what they paid in with interest. This is not true. Most people are unaware of the fact that our current Social Security system is a "pay-as-you-go" program, which means that the revenue the federal government raises each tax year for Social Security benefits is paid out that same year to benef...   [tags: Social Security Privacy Retirement Essays] 2005 words
(5.7 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Essay on Privatization of Social Security - It’s a matter of either losing all that you have worked for and live in poverty when retired or allowing your hard earned dollars to grow and have a secure comfortable retirement. I believe that Social Security is a doomed Government Program and that Privatization of Social Security would allow for a more secure retirement plan for all Americans. Social Security was first created to help aging Americans in their senior years so they would not end up in poverty. Social Security was signed in as law on August 14, 1935 by President Franklin D....   [tags: retirement, poverty, tax revenue, sustainability]
:: 6 Works Cited
1325 words
(3.8 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Proposed Alternative to the Privatization of Social Security Essay - Our nation is on the verge of a crisis. The money that is put aside for Social Security and the benefit of our elders is drying up. Because of this, our president has announced in his State of the Union address that Social Security should be privatized. The benefits of this plan, according to Mr. President, would allow the people to take the money out of social security, and place it in their own investments, thus alleviating the pressure from the government. Democrats are deeply troubled by this proposal and claim that this course of action would be disastrous for seniors....   [tags: government, politics] 910 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Privatization of Social Security Essay - Privatization of Social Security When people lease a car, they pay, knowing that they get something in return. When people pay taxes, they pay, knowing it's the law, and many get some money back. What do people think when they pay social security. Many young people see Social Security as something they are paying but will never get anything in return. What is another way for retirement for the United States. A major topic of retirement talk today often ends up with the new idea of Privatization....   [tags: Exploratory Essays Research Papers] 1392 words
(4 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay about Privatization of Social Security - Privatization of Social Security Defenders of Social Security point out that without it, nearly four million more older Americans would have been counted as poor during 1997. But analysts say that living above the official poverty income level in retirement years is not all that difficult even for those with low incomes during their working years. All an elderly person had to earn in 1997 to be above the poverty threshold for persons 65 or older was $7,698. To receive that amount of income, all an elderly person had to have at age 67 is $192,450 in government bonds assuming current interest rates and that the individual's net worth is protected from the erosion of inflation....   [tags: Papers] 591 words
(1.7 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Privatization, the Best Option for Social Security Reform Essay - ... Instead, Social Security recipients would have money go into a private account which the account holder would have control over. In 2000 Bush pushed for privatization, this plan would give young workers the choice to create a government-supervised private account which included bonds, stocks, and other financial holdings (Fox News 2008). This started the idea of having ownership over a private account that was personally controlled. Account holders were directly receiving the money they invested in Social Security, and have the option to spend the money as they see fit....   [tags: retiree funds]
:: 4 Works Cited
834 words
(2.4 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Social Security Privatization and Its Impact on Society Essay - Social Security Privatization and its Impact on Society II. Introduction Each day that goes by there is a politician or journalist arguing about social security, the plans for saving it, and the repercussions of said plans. These topics are constantly flowing through newspapers, internet sites, online journals, and economic journals as well as many other forms of media. The major topic of discussion is the plan put forth by the current administration to reform social security, or more specifically, privatize it....   [tags: Management] 2795 words
(8 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
The Social Security Program Essay - ... Therefore, inferring from the 2013 Trustees Report this change is possibly the key component of any frame work to changing social security (The Board of Trustees, 2013). Proponents of social security privatization have built their argument around the premise the government grossly mismanages the fund, therefore individuals do not get the maximum return on their investment (Gokhale, 2013). They argue one of the key factors for government to keep social security in its current form is its ability to inflate the value of public savings and deflate the value of public debt (Svihula, 2008)....   [tags: employment, policy makers, privatization]
:: 6 Works Cited
1395 words
(4 pages)
Term Papers [preview]
Essay on Pros and Cons of Privatized Social Security - When we hear about social security we think of that number every adult and college teen should memorize as they venture on the real world. We don’t think any more of it and most people don’t know about the benefits of such a number and having one. Some migrants from other countries dream of being in America and having a social security so that they may reap the benefits of having such a number and becoming a US citizen, while most every day people just assume it’s a number. What social security is would be a program created back in 1935 and it was used to provide old age, disability, and survivors insurance and on top of that, a supplemental security income which is a income for the elderly...   [tags: United States, privatization, retirement, stocks]
:: 6 Works Cited
1203 words
(3.4 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
privatization Essay - The social impact of privatization has been an appendage rather than being built into the design of public sector reform programs and particular measures from start to finish. The objectives and the process of privatization has to be rethought because democracy requires the fullest participation of all people in American society, not just those deemed to live in the “public sector”. What is happening is not only increasing fear of the poor, but also the privatization of public space, which is given an added push by government cut-backs....   [tags: essays research papers] 756 words
(2.2 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]

Related Searches




It would need to be increased so every year so that the actual 2.2 % would only exist for the first year. It has been estimated that the social security fund will dwindle to the negatives in 2013, and never come back. (Howe) Even with the 2.2% solution, it doesn't solve the problems from deep within. This "simple solution" doesn't even address the big picture.

 

One of the bigger problems is with the younger workers because this plan doesn't benefit them anymore. The idea of the 2.2% solution is simple, but short-termed. With the current funds, Social Security can exist until 2032, and with the 2.2% it could last until 2072. (Howe) But these ideas will both only happen with the use of the Social Security trust funds. Because of Congress, these trust funds are almost non existent.

 

Who exactly does social security benefit? The United States as a whole? Does one gender seem to receive more than the other? The facts indicate that women do not benefit as much as men with social security. Women live longer and are paid less, making them twice as likely as a man to be in poverty when retired. In 1995, a retired male on the average received eight hundred ten dollars a month, but a women only received six hundred twenty-one dollars. Not many women earn enough money to pay both their social security and keep a private account for retirement. Women also don't have as many opportunities for a pension plan and their longer life expectancy creates a need for more money. Social security can leave widows with one half of the income that she was receiving when her husband was still alive, thus creating a large poverty rate for elderly women. (Shirley) Privatization would benefit women greatly by letting them keep receiving income from money their husbands put aside. Instead of cutting the benefits after their husbands death, they would also receive income from the money they put aside.

 

Among everyone in the United States, there is a group of people who depend on social security the most. Sadly enough, it is these people who receive the least. The poor are always more likely to look for benefits for retirement: they have the least money. Because of the low return of Social Security, poverty is common with the elderly. Not only do the wealthy have more money, they usually live longer and receive more payments. Wealthy people make more money, and pay more social security, so just because the poor people don't make as much money; they have to suffer in the end. With privatization, life expectancy would not be a factor. People would have a property right with their benefits, and any remaining benefits at the time of their death would go to their heirs. (Tanner, "Privatizing Social Security"). There are those who have depended on welfare for their life; privatization gives those people the chance to make more money to leave poverty. They have the chance to invest their money in bonds. It is those people who have depended on government programs such as housing projects and food stamps. Their family will continue on down the line needing government, help due to the fact that their successors in life will receive nothing from them when they die.

 

People often die with no wealth or savings for their heirs, therefore continuing a cycle of government dependency for money. (Star Parker) The major factor of privatization is its high return rate. This would benefit the poor greatly. In the United States today, the poorest twenty percent of the elderly need Social Security to provide for eighty-eight percent of their income. (Tanner, Privatizing) Even though Social Security has helped over 16 million people out of poverty, there is not any money left to help the new incoming elderly, and baby boomers. Baby Boomers expect a return rate of 2.4%. Those born in the seventies should already only expect 1% return. ("The Arguments..."). Privatization would give them a larger opportunity to get more money after retirement. Research indicates that as time goes on the poor elderly get poorer, and the wealthy get wealthier. Low-income elderly will basically depend fully on social security while rich people often will have private pension plans to supplement their social security. It is thought that if one were to want to live in retirement, as they did in pre-retirement they would have to pay sixty to eighty-five percent of their income to social security.(Tanner, Privatizing) However, social security does not take close to that amount. Therefore it does not provide a good retirement for many, especially the poor.

 

With privatization, the people would be given the opportunity to invest some of their payroll taxes in bonds. This could add greatly to their benefits. The poor would have the chance to actually have a retirement instead of their inadequate little social security check. Privatization's higher returns would equal ninety-two percent of their pre-retirement income and if they invest in bonds, it is increased into one hundred eighty-eight percent. That much income could never be possible with the present social security system.

 

Survivor benefits are extremely better with Privatization than that of Social Security. Under Social Security, after a member of the family dies, their paycheck from social security no longer exists. The money they once paid, will benefit no one in their family. However, with Privatization, the family benefits greatly. They inherit all benefits left by the deceased person. (NCPA Report).

 

Privatization is the retirement plan of the future. With Social Security anticipated to last a few more years, we need to look into a new plan. Privatization would benefit all, and provide a much more stable income for retirement. There is a choice for the American people: Pay for someone else to retire, and have nothing when you get there, or push to get a new plan; a plan that will work, a plan called Privatization.


Return to 123HelpMe.com