Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion of African elephants
Conclusion of African elephants
Conclusion of African elephants
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion of African elephants
People have mentioned that the only thing valuable about elephants is its ivory and that these enormous animals are slow and stupid. Therefore, the uninformed society makes negative assumptions, about things they don't understand, and make false accusations about the gentle creature. For example, people thought they travel in disorganized herds because they're slow and stupid, but the elephants actually travel in organized herds that are always kept together. Our dominant ideology is to portray elephants as killers, unsociable, funny, and illogical creatures. To understand the real characteristics of the elephant, we must disperse any false impressions that have been previously established on the way the elephants behave in the wildlife.
The mistaken beliefs of the general publics result from a lack of information about the elephant, in its natural environment. If truth be told, the majority of elephants that most people see today seem to depict that moronic quality. To exemplify, elephants are viewed as funny because they are forced to perform impractical and pointless tricks for our enjoyment, such as circus acts. While they are holding each others' tails, walking in a line, standing on their hind legs, balancing a ball, and wearing ridiculous little hats, we have made it difficult for people to see the true mental complexity of this creature.
Many people see the elephant as killers because of what they watch on television. For instance, television shows such as When Animals Attack show these gentle creatures trampling their owners and handlers in a desperate attempt to escape. The general public believes in these stereotypes because they are represented on specialty shows. In the animal documentaries they are foreseen as pleasant and quite affectionate creatures. They will only protect themselves if someone is bringing or doing harm to them that might lead them in to danger, such as throwing objects at the elephant. As talked about in the animal documentaries the elephant like; to avoid confrontation. Society needs to realize these elephants have feelings to, they kind of parallel humans. When someone is doing harm to us we protect ourselves by fighting, or calling for someone to help, like elephants do.
Have you ever wondered how animals interact and work together to get a job done? Many times, animals put their minds together to complete a task. But what many people do not realize is that animals interact with one another just as humans would. In many instances, people don’t realize the amount of intelligence and common sense that animals, such as the elephant, possess. The study of elephant’s thoughts and thinking were explained and backed up through three different mediums. This information was explained through articles, videos, and passages. Combined, these pieces of work clarified what the experiment was, what it was testing, the purpose behind it, and how the different pieces were
Each author has the same purpose in writing about the elephant studies and there are many similarities and differences in which the elephants behaved.
The rapid evolution of the family Elephantidae throughout time has been extensively researched in the past decades and has resulted in many new discoveries and lineages between the genuses of Elephantidae. Throughout evolution, a majority of the species of Elephantidae have become extinct, leaving only Loxodonta africana, Loxodonta cyclotis, and Elephas maximus. The number of these species, however, has dwindled significantly in the past years due to the high number of deaths of elephants due to poaching. The continuation of poaching has a possibility of a new evolutionary event within the elephants, elephants without tusks.
This knowledge and empathy combined would anthropomorphize elephants, imagining them as more human-like and would lead to coexistence, aka the trans-species psyche. In Siebert's An Elephant Crackup?, elephants and humans as a whole are in conflict with each other due to not knowing why the other group is aggressive and thus are in constant retaliation to each other (Siebert 322). A trans-species psyche can not be achieved if humans do not imagine elephants are equal beings. This imagination is not simply making up things as if they were lies, imagining elephants as more human teaches humans that they are emotionally and socially on the same level by emphasizing their mind's eye; giving another perspective of elephants than just wild animals ready to be poached. An example of people being blind to imagination is shown in an incident when a herd of elephants killed a man near the village Katwa, but buried him out of respect. The elephants themselves elephantmorphize the human so the human is like them, but the humans that want to retrieve the man's corpse do not anthropomorphize the elephants. The human villagers shoot gunfire on the elephants to drive them away, causing future generations of traumatized and violent elephants (334). Without imagination, people would not be able to understand others(which don't have to be human) causing a lack of empathy, a trait important for creating the trans-species psyche that Siebert
There are some wounds that never show on the body that are deeper and more hurtful than wounds that bleed. Just as all humans, elephants similarly feel emotions whether it is joy or sorrow. In his article “An Elephant Crack Up?” the author, Charles Siebert focuses on the recent strange and bellicose behaviors of elephants and clears up the causes of the behaviors with plenty of informative observations. In “Immune to Reality,” Daniel Gilbert theorizes that the psychological immune system is triggered by large-scale negative events. We also see these negative effects in the passage, “The Mega-Marketing of Depression in Japan,” while Ethan Watters exposes the attempts of Glaxo Smith Kline to convince the Japanese doctors that the Japanese people
At this point the only way one would know about the elephant, is through the destruction left in its wake such as how the elephant “destroyed someone’s bamboo hut,” how it overturned a “municipal rubbish van,” and a “Dravidian coolie” that could “not have been dead many minutes.”(Orwell). Henceforth the ambiguity grants the readers to paint a picture of the elephant until its unveiling. From Orwell’s description of elephant, the reader can only surmise that the elephant is terrifying rampaging beast that needs to be put down coinciding with the “two thousand wills”(Orwell) forcing Orwell forward to kill the elephant. Unbeknownst to the reader and younger Orwell at the time, the elephant was merely going through must, a seasonal frenzied state of mind of male elephants, and typically is far calmer. However, without knowing this information just like Orwell, one would be taken aback by Orwell’s description of the elephant. Although Orwell insinuates that the Orwell is a ghastly beast by describing the carcass of one of the elephant’s victims mangled bodies lying with its “arms crucified” with an “expression of unendurable agony;”(Orwell) nevertheless he is quick to juxtapose the elephant's rampage to how the elephant really is by describing the serenity as it was “peacefully eating” with a “grandmotherly air.” In contrast with the elephant’s aforementioned bloodlust, the elephant was also depicted as taking not the “slightest notice” of Orwell and “the crowd’s
According to the beginning of the video, it states, “Scientists now believe [elephants are] among the world’s most cognitively advanced animals.” The outcome of this experiment was so positive that now elephants are one of the world's most advanced animals. However, this took the scientists by surprise. Subsequently, it also states in the video, “Elephants recently aced an IQ test with two of them even figuring out shortcuts the researches hadn't thought of.” This in particular, was most outstanding due to to the fact that the researchers didn’t even think of the shortcut that the elephants made. This really proves that elephants are wise mammals; possibly, even wiser than us humans. To conclude, it states in the video, “Scientists say the test highlights not only the intelligence of individual elephants but also their ability to cooperate and understand the value of teamwork.” This here exhibits that the elephants understand that certain tasks need to be done with the assistance of others, not just by themselves. Thus, as the video illustrates the elephants are more brainy than we
“Elephants know when they need a helping hand-or rather, trunk.” In the video, Elephants Show Cooperation, the article, Elephants Can Lend a Helping Trunk, and the passage from Elephants Know When They Need a Helping Trunk in a Cooperative Task, the authors illustrate the intelligence of these animals. They all show an experiment that proves this claim. Elephants “join the elite club of social cooperators: chimpanzees, hyenas, rooks, and humans.” Their cognitive ability even suprises the researchers. Not only do they make wise decisions, but they cooperate with others. All three sources depict the sagacity of these remarkable creatures.
He, the elephant and the “sea of yellow faces,” (Orwell, 1946, para.6), are all actors in the precarious theater that, “the futility of the white man’s dominion in the East,” (Orwell, 1946, para.7), has created. Clearly his predicament included concern for his own safety as he could easily be trampled to death if the animal charged at him. Furthermore, the pressing will of the jeering crowd to entertain them cornered him as the spectacle of the moment if he succeeded in felling the elephant or the laughing stock of the town if he failed. Of course there was also the owner of the elephant, who being absent from the scene, would inevitably be furious at losing the working elephant’s strength at his disposal. Quickly assessing all his options Orwell realized he had to shoot the elephant. Recognizing the pachyderm as the innocent victim of the situation, he clearly did not wan to shoot him, but the crowd’s expectations prevailed. The spectators, his subjects, expected him to be in control of the situation and were looking forward to the meat the dead animal would provide. “A sahib has got to act like a sahib,” (Orwell, 1946, para.7), as the natives referred to himself and any other European officers. Lying down on the ground to take aim he shot in the wrong spot to kill the elephant in the most humane way possible. The slow agonizing death of the elephant took a whole
Elephants should not be killed because they are one of the main reasons that people visit the foreign land of Africa. Africa is incredibly hot and is not the most intriguing place to go on your vacation. If there were no elephants the amount of tourists would significantly decrease. Twenty eight percent of all tourist come to see the elephants. In the movie “Ivory Wars” the narrator says “ One of the few attractions for tourists is the African elephants that run wild and free across the vast plains of the continent of Africa.” When the amount of tourists decrease so does the money that they pay to see the elephants at a safari. Africa is obviously does not have the strongest economy to begin with and without the elephants to bring in tourists the continent of Africa will fall apart. Elephants are exotic and amazing to see, and without them would there really be a reason to visit Africa?
Prejudice plays a big part in “Shooting an Elephant.” It is seen in the relationship between the Burmese natives and the narrator,
What do you think about when you hear the word Africa? How about the word safari? Most people tend to think about elephants or giraffes. In this paper I will tell you many important facts about elephants: how they live, their appearance, and many other interesting facts about them. There are two different kinds of elephants; the African elephant and the Asian elephant (also known as the Indian elephant). The African elephant is the larger of the two.
The number of African and Asian elephants in North American zoos is declining as a result of many medical issues. A new disease has recently been discovered that is now hindering elephant’s ability to survive even further. This is a major problem because according to Science Magazine, as of 1997, there are only an estimated 291 Asian elephants and 193 African elephants left in North American zoos. Since this survey was conducted, this number has severely declined. It is now estimated that for every elephant that is born in a zoo another three die.
Morally, I think this story clearly states that people would do anything to avoid being embarrassed. From my understanding, I think that this story teaches us that we should be open to hear people?s opinions but we should follow our instincts. We should not allow others to make the decisions for us. The police officers just shoot the elephant because people wanted him to do so. This essay is trying to help us to see that we should look at the pros and cons of an issue rather than making a quick decision that can affect someone. I cannot condemn the author for shooting the elephant, though he knew it was wrong. Nor can I condemn him for giving in to the natives and not sticking to his guns. He does not want to appear foolish to others like all of us do.
African elephant, Loxodonta africana, are the largest extant land animal, and consume huge quantities of vegetation, approximately 1% (dry weight) of their body mass every day (Baxter 2003). They are classified as mega-herbivores, and generally considered the most principal ecosystem engineer, shaping the environment and driving shifts in vegetation (Augustine and Mcnaughton 2004, Kerley and Landman 2006).