Argumentative Essay: American Have the Right To Bear Arms


Length: 1502 words (4.3 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Excellent
Open Document
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document

Being a young American I have witnessed many problems with growing up in this great country of ours. We have homeless people who can't find work, rising inflation rates, an unbalanced budget, and more importantly, a problem with guns.

Like every other good ol' boy, I am concerned about being the victim of a random shooting, but at the same time, I want to be able to take down a nice10-point buck during hunting season. Guns effect every one of us every day. They fill us with fear or they make us feel protected. My point is this: guns are a problem, but using gun control to abolish them isn't necessarily the best solution. In gun control I mean laws that keep firearms off the street by preventing their purchase. I agree that some form of gun control is needed, butwhat we really need to concentrate on is gun licensing and more gun safety. I believe in my constitutional right to keep and bear arms, and I don't feel that legislators should be allowed to take away that right. Gun control can be a good thing, but if it leads to gun prohibition I will fight it until the day I die.

 

Our country was founded on the basis of guns. The wars were won with guns and the people were protected by guns. Guns were so important that they were placed in the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution:

 

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Amendment II

 

From this amendment it is apparent that the founders of our country knew in 1791 that guns did and would continue to play a role in the lives of Americans. Things haven't really changed that much.

 

Gun control was brought into play to protect citizens from criminals and lunatics who shouldn't have guns in the first place. But only 27 percent of the criminals who are in prison for crimes involving guns have obtained them legally (Henderson 23). If criminals can find guns illegally now, how is more gun control going to stop them from getting them later? Groups against gun control,the most dominant being the NRA (National Rifle Association), are afraid gun control is the first step in outlawing guns.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Argumentative Essay: American Have the Right To Bear Arms." 123HelpMe.com. 28 Apr 2017
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=10302>.
Title Length Color Rating  
It's Time to Reconsider America's Right to Bear Arms Essay - Imagine a world in which humans weren’t forced to stoop to a criminal’s level in order to feel safe, a world in which arguments were settled with words, and power came from the mind and not a weapon. Imagine a world without guns. Unfortunately in the United States, this world has become unattainable, but stricter legislation on handguns would bring this ideal world one step closer. The handgun statistics in America speak for themselves. After comparing America’s statistics to those in other countries with stricter handgun legislation, it becomes clear that something must be done to fix the broken American system....   [tags: argumentative, persuasive, gun control]
:: 7 Works Cited
1139 words
(3.3 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
We Must Have the Right to Keep and Bear Arms Essay - Within the United States Constitution, amendments one through ten referred to as the “Bill of Rights” contains amendment two which reads “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (States, 1789). Despite this amendment, gun control still remains one of the most highly-debated issues in the United States. While the Constitution clearly states our right “to keep and bear Arms”, the gun control lobbyists continue to challenge this right by using the media to convey misleading stories on how guns by themselves are the problem....   [tags: argumentative, persuasive, gun control]
:: 3 Works Cited
1353 words
(3.9 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay about Gun Control versus The Right to Bear Arms - Gun Control versus The Right to Bear Arms Missing Works Cited With the topic of gun control comes a widely split crowd. There are those that believe that gun control is necessary for decreasing crime and making a nation a safer place to live. And on the other end of the spectrum, they are those that speak of how anti-gun control is what would make our nation a safer place to live. After all, ?Would a person be as likely to break into another family's home knowing that the family has means of personal protection?....   [tags: Papers Argumentative Essays] 877 words
(2.5 pages)
Good Essays [preview]
Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Violates The Second Amendment of the Constitution - Civilian ownership of firearms has for more than two hundred years been the very cornerstone upon which the liberty of the public has been supported. The very reason that Americans have never suffered a tyranny on the scale of Nazi-Germany has been due to the proliferation of firearms in the hands of the general public. The Second Amendment to the Bill of rights of the United States Constitution states "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." In order to understand that right, the modern reader must understand the semantics of the eighteenth century....   [tags: Second Amendment The Right To Bear Arms] 977 words
(2.8 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Violates the Second Amendment - Few issues incite americans more than the issue of rising crime and violence. This problem can easily be linked to the availability of guns."The debate over whether guns are a hallowed tradition and a right guaranteed by the Second Ammendment of the U.S.constitution or whether they are a fearful danger contributing to crime and violence." ("gun control") Due to the outbreak of violence in our society, some people feel that repealing the Second Ammendment would solve the problem. These people feel that repealing the Second Ammendment would solve the problem....   [tags: Constituton Bill Rights Right To Bear Arms] 1568 words
(4.5 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Argumentative Essay: Gun Control is Oppression - When our fore fathers first came onto this land, they were oppressed by their rulers. These wise men decided to stage a revolt against their government and start up a new government, with a set of rules, laws and rights. They did not stage this massive revolt by negotiation, or arbitration but with blood shed on both sides. When the revolt was over, the fore fathers had risen to victory through the use of warfare and guns. They then decided to make a bill stating the basic rights that every man in the country could have....   [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Essays] 1272 words
(3.6 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Bearing Arms at Nineteen Years Old Essay - The right to bear arms is embedded in our Nation’s constitution as the second amendment of the Bill of Rights. The amendment states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed (Bill of Rights).” Currently these laws should be extended to nineteen year olds because they are considered legal adults and citizens. Although the United States no longer has local militias, the idea of keeping a secure state still stands today....   [tags: argumentative, persuasive, gun control]
:: 9 Works Cited
1787 words
(5.1 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Argumentative Essay: America Does NOT Need Gun Control - Americans are faced with a huge problem of violence in the streets, these streets have become a place where old people are beaten for their social security checks, where little women are attacked and raped, where teen aged thugs shoot it out for some turf to sell their illegal drugs, and finally where small children everyday are caught in the way of bullets during drive by shootings. We try to ignore the criminals in our society and how they hurt it, but we shouldn’t. We should take actions to stop these acts of crazy people....   [tags: Gun Control Essays] 1038 words
(3 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay about The Second Amendment: Americans Have the Right to Bear Arms! - The United States Constitution says that U.S. Citizens have the right to bear arms. Even though this guarantee was written with no constraints, there are now laws that limit certain aspects of gun ownership. The reasons for gun control fall under the flag of public safety. Though there are many safety reasons why private ownership of firearms should be banned, these arguments are outweighed not only by the need for protection, but because the limitation of ownership rights could become dangerous to personal freedom....   [tags: 2nd Amendment Constitution The Right To Bear Arms] 2373 words
(6.8 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Argumentative Essay: Handgun Ownership Should Not be Banned - Should handgun ownership be banned. I don't believe so. You would think America would learn from examples from other countries. When you take away handguns the crime rate rises. American citizens need to know their rights, responsibilities and safety of owning a handgun. The second amendment says, "A well regulated militia being necessary to security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." The second amendment was made for two things. It is there for first, to guarantee the individuals right to have arms for self-defense and self-preservation....   [tags: Gun Control Essays] 358 words
(1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]

Related Searches




Though the government is trying to help, they aren't solving any of the problems, they are just making it harder for the average citizen to obtain a gun.

 

It is the average citizen, after all, who is going to go out and buy a firearm legally. When it comes to handguns, most are just looking for protection for themselves and their loved ones. Robert Dillon writes, "Yeah, I armed myself two years ago. Why? Because like a lot of other Angelenos, I was scared. My 26-year-old son was shot in his car on Crescent Heights, near Pico..." (Dillon53). People are frightened. If we don't allow guns, we are denying people their right to protect themselves and taking away their sense of security. They don't want to be killed due to lack of protection.

 

If one were to stop and think about it, the old saying that "guns don't kill people, people kill people" is truly valid. Groups for stricter gun control,such as Handgun Control Inc. (HCI), argue that guns do kill people. They think that it is the gun that makes people feel they are in the right and have the power to take someone's life and control a situation (Kriegel 818). In reality, one cannot place the blame on the gun. Guns aren't animate objects that can pick their victims. Guns require people to pull the trigger. For this reason it is my belief that the emphasis of gun control should be placed on teaching gun safety and keeping the criminals from getting their hands on firearms.

 

On the topic of ideal gun control, Karl Simon writes, "...the 'ideal' gun control program [is] one that does not pose serious barriers to the possession of handguns for legitimate purposes, but does effectively inhibit the use of handguns in crime by a method which has low cost to the criminal justice system and to society at large"(Simon, 17)

 

The Brady law, which was passed in February 1994, is a good step towards keeping guns out of the wrong hands. The law was named after Jim Brady who was shot and crippled during an assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan in1981. This law requires a background check on any person purchasing a handgun,which allows merchants to deny sales to convicted felons, drug or alcohol addicts, non-U.S. residents, and people who are mentally incompetent. The Brady law also requires a five day waiting period for the sale of handguns. This allows time for the background checks and a "cooling off" period for the customer. The"cooling off" period gives the gun buyer a chance to think about why they arepurchasing the gun, and quite possibly could prevent them from doing something rash (Davidson 193).

 

The Brady law is a good idea, but fails in a few ways. The most obvious problem is that there is not enough federal funding for the law. The cost of the computer systems and people required to run the checks runs into the hundreds of millions. In an article on the Brady law in Governing magazine, Andre Henderson reports, "Although $200 million is likely to be budgeted over the next four years to help states automate and update computer records, federal officials admit more will be needed" (Henderson 24). If the problem with funding is not solved the law will be inefficient and could possibly be overturned (Henderson 24). Another problem with the Brady bill is it only effects the people trying to purchase their guns legally. Nothing can be done about the criminals buying guns on the streets. In Los Angeles magazine, Daniel Foster writes, "I also considered the possibility that criminals, whose only waiting period consists of the 15 minutes it takes to score a $50 shotgun on Crenshaw, are indeed the greatest proponents of strict gun-control measures" (Foster 56).

 

More important than gun control is gun safety. People need to learn not only how, but also when to use a gun. Most of the people who go out and buy gunsdon't have proper training. This is dangerous for them and the people they come across. Too many people treat guns as toys rather than the killing machines they are. Gun owners need to learn that having a gun is a tremendous responsibility. If that responsibility is taken lightly, people could die.

 

One incident that comes to mind is the Collin Ferguson shootings. On a train to Long Island, Ferguson opened fire on innocent people. Laura Koss, who watched six people killed and seventeen injured by the gunfire states, "It strikes me as odd that a person has to take a test and get a license in order to drive a car,but doesn't have to do the same to buy a gun. Maybe if such enforcements were inplace, Collin Ferguson wouldn't have been able to buy his pistol." (Koss 12). It is strange that a firearm made specifically to kill requires no training while a car does. Every gun owner should take classes and be awarded a license to have their weapons. Some types of licensing are being used currently, but not to the extent they should be. For example, every hunter knows that come November they better have ahunting license or they're going to receive a serious fine. True this isn't a license on their guns, but it is a license that requires a hunting safety course or some previous knowledge of gun safety. There are also states like Florida and Arizona which allow concealed handguns to be carried on one's person, BUT they must have the appropriate license and training (Dillon 60).

 

Overall, gun control is a necessary idea to continue gun use in our country, but not as important as its advocates believe. True, gun control lessens the amount of guns on the streets, but it takes the guns out of the hands of responsible owners, not the criminals. Illegally purchased firearms can't be regulated and they are the guns that are doing most of the killing. By placing a block on legal purchases the government is denying the common citizen the ability to protect themselves. It seems such a shame that one would have to die because the government wouldn't allow them to have a gun. The emphasis of gun control should be placed on teaching gun safety to those who haven't already had any experience and licensing those wishing to use their firearms. By doing so, the government would be helping the average gun owner learn what his or her mistakes might be, and keep some of the deaths from occuring.


Return to 123HelpMe.com