Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How evolution is taught in schools
How evolution is taught in schools
Creationism in schools pro and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How evolution is taught in schools
The evolving issue of teaching Creationism in schools is important to all of us; it gives us the perceptions of both sides: the scientific and the religious. There are many theories about the origin of the earth and universe in which people can choose to believe in, but how come we have not settled into the best and most possible theory? This essay intends to make you aware and understand the reasons behind teaching Creationism in schools.
A never-ending debate between Evolution and Creationism, until now, is not yet being settled and decided on. They say that the main origin of this unending issue is actually an “intellectual war” between Science and Religion. These two broad concepts cannot be really combined together. What we can do now is to settle this issue to the most possible and easier way. Best of which is giving both parties representation in the curricula of the schools.
Creationism should be taught in school since it is one of the most possible reasons why we exist, providing more options to believe in for different kinds of people.
“Creationism should be taught in schools, but why?” This could be one of the questions being raised by scientists and other people who believe in the theory of Evolution. Creationism and Evolution, what about these? Creationism is based on a superior belief of religion that a Powerful Creator – known as God by Christians – is the one who started everything. It is simpler defined as to a wide range of beliefs (Isaak, 2000). This is basically originated from the act of interpreting literally writings from the Bible. No such thing, even Science, can contradict and prove that it is either true or false. Yes, this can just be merely believed to be true through faith. At the same time, Evol...
... middle of paper ...
...e, what else can we do? Whom do we believe in? And lastly, Creationism will also help children better understand this world, making them represented and moral person.
Works Cited
Haught, J. F. (2001). Responses to 101 Questions on God and Evolution. New York: Paulist Press.
Isaak, M. (2000, May 30). What is Creationism? Retrieved from The Talk Origins Archive: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/wic.html
Melton, J. L. (2002). Fables and Facts about Creation and Evolution. Retrieved from http://www.av1611.org/jmelton/Evolution.html
Reetz, L. J., & Jacobs, G. M. (1999). Faculty Focus on Moral and Character Education. Retrieved from CBS Business Network:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3673/is_2_120/ai_n28752499/?tag=content;col1
Scott, E. C. (2004). Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction. Westport, Conneticut, London: Greenwood Press.
In the uncertainty that the modern world is, there is one law that stays petrified in stone no matter what happens: “Things change with age.” No matter if it is in history, science, or even Pokémon, things change as time passes by and this process is called evolution. The theory formulated by Charles Darwin is the belief that all organisms have come from earliest creatures because of external factors (“NSTA…”). School boards everywhere have accepted the theory of Evolution as fact making it essential to be in the curriculums of science classrooms. However, over the years, controversy has arisen as the fact that is evolution is still only a theory with flaws and setbacks, efficiently making other theories (i.e. intelligent design) a viable alternate in the classroom. The law, on the other hand, had a different idea about these other theories with numerous bans them from schools, claiming them to be against the second amendment. Despite the bitter debate of rather or not it is valid and right for teaching (primarily alone) the theory of evolution lies as being the most reliable and accurate way to teach how the modern world came to be.
McNeel, S. (1994). College teaching and student moral development. In J. Rest, & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 27-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Robert Root-Bernstein and Donald L. McEachron, “Teaching Theories: The Evolution-Creation Controversy,” The American Biology Teacher, Vol. 44, No. 7 (Oct…1982). This article, written by Robert Root-Bernstein and Donald L. McEachron sheds light on the controversy of evolution vs creationism in schools and the validity of each being called a scientific theory. The work was created to answer the questions, “Which of these theories is truly scientific and which is a religious belief? Which should be taught in schools?” The article concluded in favor of evolution as a valid scientific theory that should be taught rather than creationism, but also mentioned the worth of understanding the latter.
Evolution and Creationism are both fact and theory but the question is which one should be taught in schools? Only a few school distracts have approved the teaching of evolution because it has more senitific evidence than creationism to prove that it is true. According to a new Gallup poll, just 39% of Americans believe in evolution. The Gallup polls also show that those Americans with higher education believe in the theory of evolution as opposed to those with only high school diplomas. The polls found that 74% Americans with post-graduate degrees believe in evolution theory compared to 21% of Americans with only high school diplomas. The Gallup polls suggest that the belief in the theory of evolution is associated with education. Evolution should be taught in schools because it has more scientific evidence to support it than creationism does. Also, public schools should not teach things that have to do with God, such as creationism, because the Constitution requires the separation of church and state. Finally, if we do not allow schools to teach evolution it would be a form censo...
Teaching of evolution has several issues. One of the main issue is that it is unfair to some students with a background of Christianity. Christians believe in Creationism, meaning God created the whole world or if not, most of the world. Darwin's theory of Evolution is complete contradictory of this. In the Bible, it is stated that God made humans in His image while Darwin's theory says that Humans evolved from monkeys. It is basically proving that God, does not exist, violating the first amendment, Freedom of Belief. The first amendment states "..respecting the establishment of religion..." When Christian students listen and are forced to learn the theory of Evolution, it is restricting them to worship without obstacles and is therefore, disrespecting the establishment of religion by defying the existence of God. "If Genesis were interpreted as symbolic, as a myth, fable or fantasy, then the entire role of Jesus would have to be reinterpreted."(http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_school.htm)
U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Character education…our shared responsibility. Retrieved August 22, 2011 from http://www2.ed.gov.
One way to address the question is whether or not creationism, in itself, is a valid idea to be taught in public schools. The answer to this can be yes. Not only should a student in American public schools learn and acquire knowledge in empirical sciences, and other tangible facts both in history and other courses, but he should also learn how to think and make decisions for himself. Unfortunately, as it turns out, creationism is in direct conflict with the biological theory of evolution. Many fundamentalist propose that creationism should replace, or at least be offered as an alternative to Darwin’s theory of evolution.
Since the time that teaching evolution in public schools was banned as heresy and taboo for contradicting the Bible, most public school systems today take an opposite approach in which creationism is seldom ta...
The concept of creationism has a strong religious history and very deep religious overtones, and the constitutionality of teaching the subject in a public school immediately was questioned. Called to preside over the resulting legal case was U.S. District Judge William Overton. Thu...
It has been polled that many teachers across the country do not prefer to teach creationism in classrooms. A Plos Biology poll states that only 12-16% of the nations biology teachers are creationist in orientation. It also says that about 1/6 of the teachers professed the “young earth” belief and 1/8 say they teach creationism in a positive light (Plos Biology). This statistic tells the public that creationism is not very popular. Teachers who do teach creationism run the risk of being ridiculed in the way they are teaching their students. Some science teachers do not even know what is appropriate to teach in the classroom, and they are overwhelmed with their jobs. This is just one reason why many biology teachers and others are against creationism.
Wiester, John L. 1993. The Real Meaning of Evolution. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 45 (3): 182-86.
The information presented in evolution studies must be viewed with an open mind since there is no definite proof or law of evolution. The dilemma boils down to science vs. religion. God has been our creator since beginning of time, but the discoveries of recent science are sudde...
Years ago a discussion about the start of the world raised a debate about how science should be taught in public schools. Must evolution be taught alone in science classes, or must it be substituted by theories for example “intelligent design,” the idea that the Earth and its existence is so complex that it must have been made by a supernatural “designer” or God? This ongoing debate in American education since 19th century that both theories evolution and intelligent design should be taught in schools but intelligent design shouldn’t be taught in science classes. In this paper, the student will discuss Darwin’s theory of evolution, Intelligent Design, and the reasons Intelligent Design should not be taught in science classrooms.
Goodlad, J. I., Sirotnik, K. A., & Soder, R. (1990). The moral dimensions of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Berkman, M. B., Pacheco, J. S., & Plutzer, E. (2008). Evolution and creationism in america’s classrooms: A national portrait. PLoS Biology,6(5),