Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
modern vs postmodern architecture
essay excamples of postmodern architecture
essay excamples of postmodern architecture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: modern vs postmodern architecture
Abstract: Contemporary architects have a wide variety of sources to gain inspiration from, but this has not always been the case. How did modernism effect sources of inspiration? What did post-modernism do to liberate the choice of influences? Now that Contemporary architects have the freedom of choice, how are they using “traditional” styles and materials to inspire them? Even after modernism why are traditional styles still around?
Through the modern era technologies evolved and avant garde was not just a matter of being ahead in you design concepts,. but also in the materials that you use. Modernist designers, in an obsession of moving forward, where always looking to enhance their ideals with new materials. When the modernist bubble burst the post-modern views came forward, embracing styles and techniques of history, architectures where liberated to be able to blend and combine techniques from throughout history. Contemporary architects, in various forms, continue on with the post-modern legacy of taking inspiration from history and seek out to use traditional building methods not only for convenience but also economical, environmental, contextual and symbolic reasons.
One of the key ideas of the modern era was to forge the designs of the future on the corpses of the past, disregarding everything from the last era and moving forward with new ideals and styles. Refining and discarding they shaped, molded and constricted the ideas of design until reaching the pinnacle of minimalism. Creating design with pure aesthetics and reducing an object down to its core fundamental elements. Using the ideas of “less is more” or even “using less for more”, the designs ended up simple and elegant with a focus not in quantit...
... middle of paper ...
...nd Maintenance in Practice. National Heritage Board.
Asquith, L., and Vellinga, M. 2006. Vernacular architecture in the twenty-first century
Taylor and Frances.
Bertens, J. W., and Bertens, H. 1995. The idea of the post-modern: a history. London, Routledge.
Gauzin-Muller, D., and Favet, N. 2002. Sustainable architecture and urbanism: concepts, technologies, examples. Birkhauser.
Gossel, P., and Leuthauser, G. 2001. Architecture in the twentieth century. Taschen.
Meijenfeldt, E. V., and Geluk, M. 2003. Below ground level: creating new spaces for contemporary architecture. Birkhauser
Meyhofer, D. 1994. Contemporary Japanese Architects. Taschen.
Richardson, P. 2004. New sacred architecture. Laurnce King publishing Ltd.
Stergers, R. 2008. Sacred buildings - a design manual. Birkhauser.
Waterson, R. 1997. The Living House. Thames and Hudson.
It is the new decade after the end of world war two and modernism is a well-established practice. Its pioneers and spearheads are prevalent figures looming over the new architects and designers who are trying to make their mark in the shadows of such historically influential people. With new technologies and materials emerging from the world wars the next era of modernism had started to evolved, bringing with it philosophies and ideas which seemed far removed from those of the pioneers of modernism “What emerged in the late 1940s and 1950s was an expanding synthesis of questions utterly removed from the confident statements of the pioneers.”(Spade 1971,10) Two significant buildings were designed in the 50's, both of them for educational institutes and to house students of architecture, there were both designed in completely different styles and methods. The first is Ludwig Mies van der Rohes' Crown Hall, finished in 1956 and designed as a part of a campus master plan for the Illinois Institute of technology in Chicago. Mies' design for Crown Hall is one of his most realised expressio...
“Form follows function.” Every great Modern architect thought, designed by and breathed these very words. Or at least, their design principles evolved from them. Modern architects Le Corbusier, Mies van der Rohe, Frank Lloyd Wright, Pierre Chareau, and Rudolf Schindler to name a few believed that the function determined the space whether the space was solely for a particular purpose or they overlapped to allow for multiple uses. Form didn’t just follow function, function defined the space. By focusing on the relationship between the architecture and the interior elements, Chareau’s Maison de Verre expanded the idea of functionalism to include not only the architecture but also the space it creates and how people function within that space.
During the 1980s, designers and architects backfired against the order of modernism. Instead, they devolved into Neo-Classical elements and structures. Decoration revolutionised architecture, interior furniture and accessories into a visionary reality.
In the early twentieth century the Modern movement of architecture and industrial design came about. This movement was a reaction to the change within society and the introduction of new technologies. The ever changing world and technology meant artists to evolve alongside the changing world and this kind of ‘industrial revolution’ that was happening. Modernists ideas have seeped into every form of design especially architecture and design. Although most modernists insisted they were not following any style in particular, their work is instantly
What makes modern architecture? Before answering this, one would need to understand what the term “modern” exactly describes. In architecture, modernism is the movement or transition from one period to another, and it is caused by cultural, territorial, and technological changes happening in the world. In Kenneth Frampton’s Modern Architecture: A Critical History, he details these three major societal changes that impact and create modern architecture.
Modernism as a new contemporary style was seen as pure geometric forms having distinct structural systems, and a relationship with the new technological advancements caused by the Industrial Revolution. Throughout Mies van der Rohe’s career he was in pursuit to provide clarity, and evolve his architecture to convert the technical solution into an architectural expression. He exposed the structure to exploit all expressive effects, which lead Mies van der Rohe to become one of four Masters of Modern Architecture
(Image taken from Tranchtenberg, Marvin, Isabelle Hyman. Architecture: From Prehistory to Postmodernity. Second Edition. Prentice Hall, Inc. New Jersey: 2002.)
The essence of modern architecture lays in a remarkable strives to reconcile the core principles of architectural design with rapid technological advancement and the modernization of society. However, it took “the form of numerous movements, schools of design, and architectural styles, some in tension with one another, and often equally defying such classification, to establish modernism as a distinctive architectural movement” (Robinson and Foell). Although, the narrower concept of modernism in architecture is broadly characterized by simplification of form and subtraction of ornament from the structure and theme of the building, meaning that the result of design should derive directly from its purpose; the visual expression of the structure, particularly the visual importance of the horizontal and vertical lines typical for the International Style modernism, the use of industrially-produced materials and adaptation of the machine aesthetic, as well as the truth to materials concept, meaning that the true nat...
In conclusion, although the development of modern architecture and the intervention of computer technology to advocate this development, the contemporary architectural outcomes have became more complex and complicated with potential formulation problems. As a result, the new architecture theories came to put boundary lines between being in the range of these problems and producing elegant modern built environment. The seduction of computer-produced form also enhances architects to involve in seeking for new theories to develop the discipline and work to combine formulization with materialization. Finally, some of these theories are accepted and some other still a controversial aspect in architecture.
Post modern architecture: A revival of architectural elements of the past or a version of aestheticism?
We know that the author is describing is the emergence of the modern approach to architecture and indeed, the modernist movement itself. The author discuss the modernist views that there was a real need for social reform. That society itself ought to be re-evaluated and re-shaped. Modernists believed that their “machine aesthetic” and ideas of mass production were the only way in which society could propel itself toward a more progressive
Modernism began in the 1890s and lasted until around 1945. Postmodernism then started at 1968 right after the Second World War. Modernism began as a rejection of the idea of cultural baggage of it pass. It is more about new ideas and also new ideas all of the time. Modernism is also based on using rational and logical most of the time. In architecture modernism played a role of bringing in new buildings after the two World Wars such as exploring new form, materials and also technology. It emphasize about simplicity in form and design, follow the principles of functional planning and obvious rejection of all the historical precedent and ornaments.
Jencks briefly explains post-modern aesthetics from their modernist predecessors’ and pinpoints the instant of modernism’s death, writing “Happily, we can date the death of Modern Architecture to a precise moment in time… Modern Architecture died in St. Louis, Missouri, on July 15, 1972 at 3:32 p.m. (or thereabouts)...” (23). Unlike Jencks, literary scholars talk about the first, most original or famous representatives of modernism, but they completely avoid pinpointing an ultimate end to the movement. Due to architecture’s visual character and Jencks’ early, authoritative, and internationally read scholarship, the differences between modern and post-modern aesthetics are often clearer in architecture than in literature. Architecture provides a helpful visual counterpoint for modern and post-modern aesthetics in literature. According to him, architectural post-modernism favours pluralism, complexity, double coding, and historical contextualism.
Post-modernism can most simply be identified as an “anti-modern” movement, (The Postmodern Moment, page 19). Marvin Trachtenberg describes it as: “An architectural phase which embraces overt historicism, garish symbolism, vivid ornamentation and humble vernacular models,” (Trachtenberg, 1986. Pg. 553). Post-modernism places emphasis on existing styles and classic forms, but contains a modern approach to its design. The idea of texture, colour and profile re-emerge in this period as seen in designs such as The Portland Building, Oregon by Michael Graves. Space is also approached in more traditional terms. Walls once again form elements which contain volumes, contradicting the Modernist approach of free plan or “infinite space,” (ibid.). The works of architects such as Philip Johnson (e.g. AT & T Building), Robert Venturi (e.g. Guild House) and Charles Moore (e.g. Piazza d’Italia) are all good examples of post-modern designs. Robert Venturi, comments that: “I try to be guided not by habit ...
Jameson, Frederic (1993): Postmodernism. in: Docherty, Thomas. (ed.) Postmodernism a Reader. Cambridge: Harvester Wheatsheaf. pp.70-71