The art of war is simple...kill your enemy, destroy their resources, and eliminate their ability to wage war against you and your interests. How we accomplish those goals and objectives is more complex and difficult due to political, logistical, and moral complications. In today’s day and age, with the emergence of communications technology, the social stigmatism countries face when innocent non-combatants are killed or injured weighs negatively on the country’s ability to wage war in a very important area of successful warfare, the psychological aspect. The ability to project armaments on intended targets with minimal collateral human and unintended material damage is critical to winning the hearts and minds of the average person. The aim of this paper is to present a brief synopsis of the history and technological advancements in unmanned military weapons systems in modern warfare and the roles that these systems may play in the future, not only in warfare but also in non-warfare roles.
Since the beginning of time, the way humans have waged war has evolved through ingenuity and progressive technology. During the Revolutionary War’s Battle of Bunker Hill, Colonel William Prescott’s famous saying “Don’t fire, till you see the whites of their eyes” (Free Republic) was indicative of the close proximity combatants had to be with each other. Killing your enemy was up close and personal, you actually saw the target you were aiming at. Guns were single shot and slow to reload, often leading to hand-to-hand combat, which in my opinion, makes killing more difficult morally. As the industrial revolution took hold after the Revolutionary War, and with the emergence of automatic guns, tanks, airplanes, and missiles, close combat...
... middle of paper ...
...opments and make every effort to determine whether we can use those advances for the betterment of society and humanity as a whole. Technological advances carries a sometimes unknown element of surprise and change in our systems, as very small differences in the initial conditions of these systems can grow into very large differences as time passes (Cornish, 2004), which is not good for our future generations.
Works Cited
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/1788168/posts
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/ambush/
Hoffman, M. (2009, March 1) UAV pilot career field could save $1.5B Audit suggests
eliminating ‘unnecessary’ training.
Air Force Times. Retrieved from http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2009/03/airforce_uav_audit_030109/
Cornish, Edward. 2004. Futuring: The Exploration of the Future. Bethesda, MD: World
Future Society.
unmanned are being used in the new concept of military operations. The placement of Special
The ability to disable an enemy force without ever having to fire a single shot – that is the new direction of warfare. Bruce Berkowitz’s The New Face of War: How War Will Be Fought in the 21st Century is yet another book that examines future warfare, not what causes countries will be fighting over or even who will be fighting, but the form of the conflict. Reading his work cover to cover, the message is clear: “To win wars today, you must first win the information war. ” This book is a must-read for anyone working in intelligence or in a position of power that influences our government spending on national security or military operations, because it articulates the importance of information technology on warfare, presents examples of how information has shaped conflicts throughout history, and provides invaluable lessons to leaders at all levels.
“Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to war puts an end to mankind”. (John F. Kennedy) “Ambush”, written by Tim O’Brien is a short story that paints a picture of how war makes us safe or less safe in our own country. The story reveals how war can take a very dramatic toll on our soldiers mental capacities, and how it numbs them, turning them into killing machines with no remorse. Humans should not be okay with the fact of killing other people, yet it is implemented into our soldiers brains like computer coding. War makes us feel less safe on our home soil because we are vulnerable to attacks, our loved ones whom we cherish are fighting overseas, and at any time our young citizens can be called for deployment.
Since the first seeds sowed, humanity has sought to change the world around them; with this desire, technological advances continue to alter the world around humans. Every advancement comes with the benefit and its drawback. These setbacks create new problems to solve, and new complications after the solution. Still, humanity desires constant improvement to their condition. The cyclical nature of this arrangement brought about humans from hunting and gathering to the moon and the internet. Feats like the latter, unimaginable to early homo sapiens, show that the cycle of achievement followed by impediment create technological progress. Humans need negative influences from technological advances so that the positive influences continue to prevail.
Technological innovation is now one of the most basic motivations in developing the human society. However, some technological growth is worrisome, especially digital technologies, because a lot of intellectuals claim that technology is changing the human mind and these changes are probably not all positive. Nicholas Carr, one of the intellectuals I’m referring to, uses his personal experiences to tell the worrisome about the convenience we gain from the developing technologies is changing our minds, and probably destroying our abilities of independent thinking. Obviously, Carr ignores the positive impacts of technology which are more effective than the negative impacts he focuses on. The technology development is still one of the most important
... has the potential to destroy a civilization at the peak of its success or create a new one from the ground up. Without proper direction given by the controllers of technology, things can quickly spiral down in a direction that does not benefit anyone. In Brave New World, technology was used to create a utopia where people prospered but in 2001 A Space Odyssey, technology nearly brought on a nuclear holocaust. Technology does not take sides in a fight, it is merely a tool used by man to better himself and those around him. Technology is not corrupt or immaculate; its role is determined by its user, the human race.
Every living creature fights to survive. It is an inbred instinct for a living thing to do what is necessary to continue its life and ensure its individual and species survival, whether that means tearing apart its prey or its enemies. Not till the modern human, however, has there been a creature able and willing to innovate upon this part of its base animal nature, to create the art of warfare out of necessity. This art, however, is like any other in that it is both reflective of and dependent on the society it is created by. Physical and economic resources, education of creative minds, and a climate of necessity are all fundamental components for any technological innovation, and it is for this reason that advances in weaponry can tell us
"Don't one of you fire until you see the whites of their eyes."- Colonel William Prescott, Battle of Bunker Hill, 1775
Since the end of the Cold War, non-state actors have risen in both prevalence and apparent power. The presence of non-state entities has caused significant ethical and political problems with Western ideology. Coker discusses issues concerning non-state actors in “Ethics and War in the 21st Century” with special attention given to the conflicting cultural ideas regarding warfare concerning the USA. The ability to label a target as not only an enemy combatant, but a fundamentally opposed force that is willing to ignore common practices and ethics is one that Coker denounces and attempts to explain. The disparity of established ethics between the two groups is only complicated with emerging weapon technologies, most importantly non-lethal weapon systems. In recent decades, the concept of a diffused enemy has proven to be ethically more problematic regarding identification and actions against a combative force with considerations for emerging technologies.
Throughout the centuries, society has been given men ahead of their time. These men are seen in both actual history, and in fictional accounts of that history. Aristotle, Copernicus, Galileo, Bacon, and even Freud laid the framework in their fields, with revolutionary ideas whose shockwaves are still felt today. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, and so society has also possessed those how refuse to look forward, those who resisted the great thinkers in science and civilization. The advancement of science and technology is like the flick of a light switch; research may be slow and tedious, but once discoveries are made, they are not long hidden. In contrast, advancement in the ideas of ethics and human values come slowly, like the rising of the sun; there are hints at advancement for a long time before the next step is ready to be made. Because of this, science and technology takes off in leaps and bounds before human values have awakened to find society moving again.
The military use of lethally autonomous robots (LAR) is not science fiction – it is happening right now. A robot is a mechanism guided by automatic controls. Autonomous robots are able to independently maintain stability and plan action. The first generation of military robots have operated under direct human control. The most well-known military robots are “drones” or unmanned aerial vehicles. The drone system currently in use is the unmanned aerial vehicles IAI Pioneer & RQ-1 Predator which can be armed with air-to-ground missiles and remotely operated from a command center. Drones have already been used by the U.S. military for unmanned air attacks in Afghanistan, Pakistan and other war zones. (Merchant, 276).
Automated warfare can take the place of soldiers in some scenarios, allowing a decrease in military deaths. Drones have advanced technology that increases accuracy while reducing the amount of noncombatant casualties. Veterans suffer unfairly from harmful repercussions as a result of combat; drone pilots have the ability to block out distractions and not get emotionally involved when they have to perform their duty. It is moral to use drone warfare because it reduces the number of U.S. soldiers lives that are put at risk, drone’s capabilities allow for target accuracy and a decline in civilian deaths, and they keep soldiers from having mental trauma in the future because they allow for emotional detachment. Though drones may appear small and simple, their abilities are vast, and their potential as warfare progresses is
Every time you open a newspaper or switch on the TV you are likely to be confronted by stories of controlled and uncontrolled aggression on the sports field, in our homes, in our neighborhoods and cities and countries across the world. Aggression seems to permeate our history and cultures. Human societies spend a lot of time trying to curb and control their citizens’ feelings of aggression to ensure social and governmental relationships function optimally in a peaceful and safe environment. At other times the flames of human aggression are fanned by the same societies in order to challenge opposing societies and ideologies. Yet in war, as in sport and other social arenas, rules have been established to govern and control the worst of aggressive human behavior and hostilities.
However, despite the long-term economic growth, technological progress is very important, and even if we...
There is no doubt that the accomplishments made through technology are astonishing. Technology has made amazing impacts on everything from science in space to medical science to the devices we use every day that make our lives easier. People are living longer and better than ever before, but we can’t forget how to live without it. “Just because technology is there and makes something easier doesn’t mean we should rely on it so much that we can’t think for ourselves,” (Levinson).