Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychological attraction
Psychological attraction
Psychological attraction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Psychological attraction
Attraction is more in depth than simply the feeling that you like someone. We meet people that we just seem to be attracted to and those we are repelled by. There are six factors that influence attraction. Each is unique and they all help us to connect and bond with others. These bond and relationships can produce three different types of love. Below we will take a deeper look at factors in attraction, the human need to bond, and the three types of love.
Attraction is an emotion that arouses our pleasurable interest. Attraction has six factors they are proximity, attractiveness, matching, similarity, equitability and hard to get. For us to be attracted to someone we must be exposed to them. The factor of proximity is important because we are more likely to be exposed to someone if they are close to us. The more often we are exposed to someone the greater the possibility for us to like them. This is known as the mere-exposure effect. An example of this is; if you interact with a person daily you have a greater chance to get to know them and being attracted to them than if you simple passed them once on the street.
We tend to be drawn to pretty things. We like beautiful art, pretty clothes and the same goes for people. We are more attracted to those we find attractive. Attractiveness is important when starting a relationship (Feenstra, 2011, p.169). Most relationships end up with both parties being close when based on attractiveness. This is the matching hypothesis, the tendency to match psychically attractively to each other in the relationships. Another important factor in attraction is similarity. We are more likely, when given the opportunity, to form relationships with those who have similar values and interest. We tend to h...
... middle of paper ...
...chemical and scientific reasoning behind love but he does do a good job categorizing the different types (Tam D., 2014, para. 11). As we have looked into the factors of attractions we have learned that there are many things that influence our feelings. Attraction, bonding, and love are all natural human actions and feeling but they can be complicated. Relationships that are more likely to last through time are those that are bonded with equity for all parties and have the characteristics of companionate love.
Works Cited
1) Feenstra, J., (2011). Chapters 13 & 14 Prejudice. In, Introduction to social psychology.
(pp. 169, 171, 178, 181) Bridgepoint Education, Inc
2) Tam D. (2014). Robert Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love | Psychology of Dating. Retrieved March 9, 2014, Para. 11, from http://psychologyofdating.net/robert-sternbergs-triangular-theory-of-love/
Sian Beilock is the author of this novel, the information written by her would be considered credible due to the fact that she is a leading expert on brain science in the psychology department at the University of Chicago. This book was also published in the year 2015 which assures readers that the information it contains is up to date and accurate. The novel is easy to understand and the author uses examples of scientific discoveries to help make the arguments more relatable. Beilock goes into depth about how love, is something more than just an emotion, it derives from the body’s anticipation. “Volunteers reported feeling
Psychologist Robert Sternberg developed the "Triangular Theory of Love" which defines the three components of love needed for a "perfect" relationship as commitment, passion, and intimacy (companionship) (Wikipedia). "The amount of love one experiences depends on the absolute strength of these three components, and the type of love one experiences depends on their strengths relative to each other" (Wikipedia). In Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, she introduces five couples which enter into marriages in all different types of love. Mr. and Mrs. Bennet have an infatuated love that fades to no love at all, Charlotte and Mr. Collins enter into an empty love, Lydia and Mr. Wickham fall into a fatuous love, Jane and Mr. Bingley focus on a companionate love, and finally, Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy find an all consummate love for each other. Throughout the novel, Austen uses these five variations of love to employ characters and define their futures.
Even some online dating sites set their matchmaking complementarity philosophy. A few have been so confident enough to say these websites are correct because compatibility gets “boring’. These types of relationships in the world of psychology are called interpersonal relationships, and according to most psychologists, they are more likely to fail then work in the long-term.Homophily, which greek roots translate “to a love of same”, protrudes that people with similar attitudes tend to form bonds or attractions. The majority of psychologists agree that if two people are similar in a romantic relationship, that is a good indicator that they will be more stable and happy together,especially in a marital
Human’s put a tremendous amount of brain energy and time into obtaining happiness, which is normally associated with finding the “perfect” mate. Many aspects go into the process that is used to determine if one person is better suited than another. Appearance, age, and personality all contribute to someone’s level of attraction to another. Opposites attract is a common myth stating that those levels of attraction are based of extreme differences between the individuals and that difference is what produces the attraction.
Love is one of life's great mysteries. People live and build their lives around love. For many people, love, or the quest to find love, is a reason to get out of bed in the morning. Love is arguably the most overwhelming of all emotions. Many ideals and religions consider the bond of love sacred. But, why do people fall in love? Is romantic love an enigma, or can it be reduced to the presence of certain chemicals and neurotransmitters within the brain at a given time?
It is tempting to believe that when couples say that they are “in love,” they view their love in the same way –that they have successfully “defined their relationship.” Love after all, is the only legitimate reason for marriage in western society and one should at least be on the same page before entering into a perpetual union (Henslin 468). Sociologists like to say that romantic love is composed of two components: sexual attraction (a biological response) and idealization of the other (a societal created response that promotes a bond between two individuals) (Henslin 468). However this is a very simple definition of love because it turns out that romantic love is in the eye of the beholder. Researchers of heterosexual love have ...
According to the Random House Dictionary (n.d.), attraction is referred to as allurement or enticement, or in physics terms, a magnetic force between oppositely charged bodies that draws them together. But in a field that is not tangible, such as social psychology, defining attraction is a bit more complex, as there is no magnetic force between humans. There are often no words to explain why one becomes attracted to a specific individual. Psychologists have proposed five factors that best determine attractions. These factors can be apparent in exchange and communal approaches, intimacy levels determined by attachment styles, and how relationships are maintained or ended through different theories.
In the book Love 2.0: How Our Supreme Emotion Affects Everything We Feel, Think, Do, and Become, Barbara Fredrickson discusses the biological aspects of love and the connections that people can have through interactions with each other. Fredrickson aims to increase the reader’s knowledge of how love works and she even tries to change the way people view love. She wants people to take a more static and scientific approach to connections between people rather than the emotional mystery that people view it as now. Sherry Turkle on the other hand wrote the book titled Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other where she tries to uncover how human interactions and connections work by observing human responses
Barbara Lee Fredrickson, a psychologist, introduces a new conception of love to the readers. She tries to simplify the perception of love most people have known for their entire life. The special bonds and magical bond that continues the love for eternity are all myths and lies. Something that poisons our minds to be committed to one another. The definition of Fredrickson’s conception of “love” is more scientific than emotional. When defining love, it is more dependent on the activity of the brain, “positivity resonance”, and love hormones. The claim that Fredrickson makes in Love 2.0 does give a critical point of love, that it is simpler than you think. However, not every conception of love does Fredrickson explain it to be biological. The
One of the micro perspectives is Lee’s styles of love, which was created by John Lee after interviewing several heterosexual men and women and reading romantic works of fiction and nonfiction. Lee’s perspective breaks love down into six separate categories. Relationships may be based on one or more of the following categories. The first is Eros, which is passionate love. The second is Storge, where we find mutual love, trust, respect and companionship. The next in Lee’s categories is Pragma, practical and sensible love. Ludus is the fourth category and it contains playful, casual, and carefree love. The fifth category, Agape is love that is kind, altruistic, and patient. The last of Lee’s categories is Mania, the type of love that is obsessive, intense, and possessive. The majority of relationships contain aspects of more than one category and the types of love we have can change over time and with different types of relationships. In Lee’s categories we can also see aspects of the types of attachments formed as babies. It is possible that those that fall in to the Mania category had anxious-ambivalent attachments to their
Paragraph one intro-What is the origin of this universal feeling known as love? It all starts with the history of love. There really is no marked beginning of this feeling that has no evidence of its existence. It could have begun scientifically with Neanderthals, or even religiously with Adam and Eve-the theories and stories are endless. Some psychiatrists claim it begins with the Oedipal suppression, where the son feels a form of love for their mother just as their daughter would feel the same for their father. As they mature and meet a potential mate who shows similar characteristics to their parents, passionate love forms between them. There is no specific answer as to why any one person falls for a particular type of person, only theories, and approaches. In this essay, we will look at all aspects of love and just what it does to the brain as well as what parts it deactivates, the things you go
This theory involves three different dimensions which include passion, intimacy, and commitment. When combined in different ways, these dimensions show different kinds of love. The different forms of love discussed in our text are infatuation, affectionate love, fatuous love, and consummate love. In my own life I have only experienced a couple different forms of the love that Sternberg describes. The two forms that I know I have experienced are affectionate love and infatuation. Consummate love is a type of love that I have never experienced. I hope to one day reach consummate love with someone and spend the rest of my life with him. I realize that not everyone gets to experience that kind of love, but I’m hopeful
Miller, T. (29 de dic de 2009). Factoidz.com. Recuperado el 3 de oct de 2011, de The chemistry behind a fool love.: http://factoidz.com/why-love-makes-us-act-so-irrational-the-chemistry-behind-a-fool-in-love/
n Robert Sternberg 's triangular theory of love, love is separated down into three different components. Passion, Intimacy, and Commitment are the three components of love and take on different roles in the theory of love. Passion involves physical and sexual attraction to the someone of interest. The feeling of excitement is also associated with passion, individuals tend to very excited to see their partner. Intimacy involves security, a sense of comfort and trust. If information about oneself is shared that it will be safe in the person of interest hands. Communication is the key element in this component. Commitment involves a decision of forming a long term relationship based on feelings for someone of interest. This in modern time in called
Sexual attraction refers to desirability as it relates to a sexual connection; individuals are sexually attracted to those they would perceive as a mate in some way. This attraction can be rooted in a variety of factors, including those both tangible and intangible. Sexual attraction often refers to physical attraction, or being aroused by a person’s physical traits. These can include appearance, smell, or voice. However, sexual